Preferences for changing power positions and power distances: A social value orientations approach

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 177-193

  Poppe, Matthijs ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037244301     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.139     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Bruins, J. J. (1994). Evidentie voor de machtafstandstheorie [Evidence for power distance theory]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 49, 99-110.
3. Bruins, J. J., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Cognitions and behaviour in a hierarchy: Mulder's power theory revisited. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 21-39.
4. Bruins, J. J., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1993). Upward power tendencies in a hierarchy: power distance theory versus bureaucratic rule. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 239-254.
5. David, H. A. (1988). The method of paired comparisons. London: Griffin.
6. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
7. Grzelak, J. L. (1982). Preferences and cognitive processes in interdependence situations: a theoretical analysis of cooperation. In V. J. Derlega, & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: Theory and research (pp. 95-122). New York: Academic Press.
8. Grzelak, J. L. (1986). Money isn't everything: differential effects of type of values upon social orientations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 17, 147-154.
9. Grzelak, J. L., Bobrowski, E., Ossewska, D., & Wyszogrodzki, K. (1994). Three less than 2? A negative effect of the number of allocation participants on prosocial orientations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 25, 223-240.
10. Grzelak, J. L., Iwinski, T. B., & Radzicki, J. J. (1977). Motivational components of utility. In H. Jungermann, & G. de Zeeuw (Eds.), Decision making and change in human affairs (pp. 215-230). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
11. Grzelak, J. L., Poppe, M., Czwartosz, Z., & Nowak, A. (1988). 'Numerical trap'. A new look at outcome representation in studies on choice behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 143-159.
12. Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2001). Social identity, leadership, and power. In A. Y. Lee-Chai, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power (pp. 159-180). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
13. Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 485-537). New York: Random House.
14. Iedema, J., & Poppe, M. (1994). Effects of social value orientation on expecting and learning others' orientations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 565-579.
15. Kuhlman, D. M., & Marshello, A. M. J. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922-931.
16. MacCrimmon, K. R., & Messick, D. M. (1976). A framework for social motives. Behavioral Science, 21, 86-100.
17. McClintock, C. G. (1972). Social motivation - a set of propositions. Behavioral Science, 17, 438-454.
18. McClintock, C. G. (1977). Social motivation in settings of outcome interdependence. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. McClintock, C. G., Messick, D. M., Kuhlman, D. M., & Campos, F. T. (1973). Motivational bases of choice in three-choice decomposed games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 572-590.
20. Mulder, M. (1977). The daily power game. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
21. Mulder, M., Veen, P., Hartsuiker, D., & Westerduin, T. (1971). Cognitive processes in power equalisation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 107-130.
22. Mulder, M., Veen, P., Hijzen, T., & Jansen, P. (1973). On power equalization: a behavioral example of powerdistance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 151-158.
23. Mulder, M., Veen, P., Rodenburg, C., Frenken, J., & Tielens, H. (1973). The power distance reduction hypothesis on a level of reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 87-96.
24. Ng, S. (1977). Structural and non-structural aspects of power distance reduction tendencies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 317-345.
25. Ng, S. (1980). The social psychology of power. London: Academic Press.
26. Poppe, M. (1980). Social comparison in two-person experimental games. Unpublished dissertation, Tilburg University.
27. Poppe, M., Van den Bergh, M., & Rosendaal, C. (1986). De rol van attituden en normen bij reductie van machtafstand [The role of attitudes and norms in power distance reduction]. In A. van Knippenberg, M. Poppe, J. Extra, G. J. Kok, & E. Seydel (Eds.), Fundamentele sociale psychologie (Vol. 1, pp. 118-135). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
28. Rijsman, J. B. (1974). Factors in social comparison of performance influencing actual performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 279-311.
29. Rijsman, J. (1983). The dynamics of social comparison in personal and categorical comparison-situations. In W. Doise, & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 279-312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Rijsman, J., & Poppe, M. (1977). Power difference between players and level of matrix as determinants of competition in a MDG. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 347-367.
31. Schulz, U., & May, T. (1989). The recording of social orientations with ranking and pair comparison procedures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 41-59.
32. Seta, J. J. (1982). The impact of comparison processes on coactors' task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 281-291.
33. Suls, J. M., & Wheeler, L. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of social comparisons: Theory and research. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
34. Van Lange, P. A. M. (2000). Beyond self-interest: a set of propositions relevant to interpersonal orientations. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 297-331). Chichester: John Wiley.
35. Van Yperen, N. W., & Buunk, B. P. (1990). A longitudinal study of equity and satisfaction in intimate relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 287-309.
36. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
37. Wieczorkowska, G. (1982). A formal analysis of preferences. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 13, 73-77.
38. Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1983). Integration, differentiation and coalition formation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 13, 181-194.