Terrestrial net primary production estimates for 0.5° grid cells from field observations - A contribution to global biogeochemical modeling

Global Change Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 46-64

  Zheng, Daolan ^a   Prince, Stephen ^a   Wright, Robb ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeochemical model; Biomass; Carbon cycle; GPPDI; IGBP; Net primary production; Productivity

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE; CARBON CYCLE; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION;

EID: 0037240688     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00534.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aber J, Neilson RP, McNulty S et al. (2001) Forest processes and global environmental changes: Predicting the effects of individual and multiple stressors. Bioscience, 51, 735-751.
2. AUSLIG (1990) Atlas of Australian resources: Vegetation, Vol. 6. Australian Survey and land Information Group, Department of Administrative Services, Commonwealth Government Printer.
3. Barrett DJ (2000) Stead state net primary productivity, carbon stocks and mean residence time of carbon in the Australian terrestrial biosphere. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Submitted.
4. Birdsey RA, Schreuder HT (1992) An overview of forest inventory and analysis estimation procedures in the Eastern United States - with an emphasis on the components of change. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station GTR RM-214.
5. Bray JR, Gorham E (1964) Litter production in forests of the world. Advances in Ecological Research, 2, 101-157.
6. Brown SL, Schroeder P, Kern JS (1999) Spatial distribution of biomass in forests of the eastern USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 123, 81-90.
7. Cheng S, Zhao Y (1990) Remote Sensing and Geo-Sciences Analysis. Measuring Press, Beijing.
8. Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter DW et al. (2001) NPP in tropical forests: an evaluation and synthesis of the existing field data. Ecological Applications, 11, 371-384.
9. Cohen WB, Spies TA, Fiorella M (1995) Estimating the age and structure of forests in a multi-ownership landscale of western Oregon, USA. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16, 721-746.
10. Coughlan JC, Running SW (1989) An expert system to aggregate biophysical attributes of a forested landscape within a Geographic Information System. AI Applications, 3, 35-43.
11. Cramer W, Kicklighter DW, Bondeau A et al. (1999) Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): overview and key results. Global Change Biology, 5 (Suppl. 1), 1-15.
12. Cramer W, Olson RJ, Prince SD (2001) Global productivity: determining present and future. In: Terrestrial Global Productivity: Past, Present, and Future (Eds Roy J, Saugier B, Mooney HA), pp. 429-448. Academic Press, San Diego.
13. Day KA, McCaskill MR, McKeon GM (1997) A review of pasture production data in Queensland. In: Evaluating the Risk of Pasture and Land Degradation in Native Pastures in Queensland (Eds Day KA, McKeon GM, Carter JO). Final report for Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation project DAQ-124A, Brisbane, Australia.
14. Diallo O, Diouf A, Hanan NP et al. (1991) AVHRR monitoring of savanna primary production in Senegal, West Africa: 1987-88. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 12, 1259-1279.
15. ERDAS (1999) ERDAS IMAGINE V8.4: Tour Guides. ERDAS Inc., Atlanta, GA.
16. Forest Ministry of China (1994) Statistics of Forest Resources of China: 1989-93. Forestry Publisher, Beijing.
17. Franklin JF, Dyrness CT (1990) Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR.
18. Gholz HL, Hawk GM, Cambell A et al. (1985) Early vegetation recovery and element cycles on a clear-cut watershed in western Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 15, 400-409.
19. Gill RA, Kelly RH, Parton WJ et al. (2001) Using simple environmental variables to estimate belowground productivity in grasslands. Global Ecology and Biogeography, in press.
20. Goetz SJ, Prince SD (1996) Remote sensing of net primary production in boreal stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 78, 149-179.
21. Goward SN, Dye DG (1996) Global biospheric monitoring with remote sensing. In: The Use of Remote Sensing in the Modeling of Forest Productivity (eds Gholz HL, Nakane K, Shimoda H), pp. 241-272. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
22. Gower ST, Krankina ON, Olson RJ et al. (2001) Net primary production and carbon allocation patterns of boreal forest ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 11, 1395-1411.
23. Grier CC, Logan NS (1977) Old-growth Pseudosuga menziesii communities of a western Oregon watershed: biomass distribution and production budgets. Ecological Monographs, 47, 373-400.
24. Hame T, Salli A, Andersson K et al. (1997) A new methodology for the estimation of biomass of conifer dominated boreal forest using NOAA AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 3211-3243.
25. Hansen MC, Defries RS, Townshend JR et al. (2000) Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 1331-1364.
26. Hansen HM, Frieswyk T, Glover JF et al. (1992) The eastwide forest inventory data base: user manual. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station GTR-NC-151.
27. Harvey LDD (2000) Box models of the terrestrial biosphere. In: The Carbon Cycle (eds Wigley TML, Schimel DS), pp. 238-247. Cambridge University Press, New York.
28. Henderson-Sellers A, Wilson MF, Thomas G et al. (1986) Current global land-surface data sets for use in climate-related studies. National Center for Atmospheric Research 272.
29. Javis PG, Leverenz JW (1984) Productivity of temperate, deciduous and evergreen forests. In: Physiological Plant Ecology (eds Lange O, Nobel P, Osmond C, Ziegler H), pp. 233-280. Springer-Verlag, New York.
30. Jenkins JC, Birdsey RA, Pan Y (2001) Biomass and NPP estimates for the Mid-Atlantic Region (USA) using plot-level forest inventory data. Ecological Applications, 11, 1174-1193.
31. Jiang H, Apps MJ, Zhang Y et al. (1999) Modelling the spatial pattern of net primary productivity in Chinese forest. Ecological Modelling, 122, 275-288.
32. Joyce LA, Chalk DE, Vigil A (1986) Range forage database for 20 Great Plains, Southern, and Western States. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-133.
33. 2 exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere.2. Global results for potential vegetation in an assumed equilibrium state. Climate Research, 8, 61-87.
34. Krankina ON, Brown S, Jenkins JC et al. (1999) Use of forest inventory data for estimating NPP. Ecological Applications, Submitted.
35. Lieth H (1975) Modelling the primary productivity of the world. In: Primary Productivity of the Biosphere (eds Lieth H, Whittaker RH), pp. 237-263. Springer-Verlag, New York.
36. Lonsdale WM (1988) Predicting the amount of litterfall in forests of the world. Annuals of Botany, 61, 319-324.
37. Lurin B, Cramer W, Moore B et al. (1994) Global terrestrial net primary productivity. Global Change Newsletter (IGBP), 19, 6-8.
38. Martinez-Yrizar D, Sarulhan J (1990) Litterfall patterns in a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico over a five-year period. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 6, 433-444.
39. Means JE, Hansen HA, Koerper GJ et al. (1994) Software for computing plant biomass-BIOPAK user guide. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station PNW-GTR-340.
40. Meentemeyer V (1982) World patterns and amounts of terrestrial plant litter production. Bioscience, 32, 125-128.
41. New MG, Hulme M, Jones PD (2000) Representing 20th century space-time climate variability II: development of 1901-96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. Journal of Climate, 13, 2217-2238.
42. Northcote KH, Hubble GD, Isbell RF et al. (1975) A Description of Australian Soils. CSIRO Publishing.
43. Olson RJ, Johnson K, Zheng D et al. (2001) Global and regional ecosystem modeling: databases of model drivers and validation measurements. Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory TM-196.
44. Prentice IC, Heimann M, Sitch S (2000) The carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere: ecosystem models and atmospheric observations. Ecological Applications, 10, 1553-1573.
45. Prince SD (1991) Satellite remote sensing of primary production: comparison of results for Sahelian grasslands 1981-88. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 12, 1301-1311.
46. Prince SD, Goward SN (1995) Global primary production: a remote sensing approach. Journal of Biogeography, 22, 815-835.
47. Prince SD, Haskett J, Steininger M et al. (2001) Net primary production of U.S. Midwest croplands from agricultural harvest yield data. Ecological Applications, 11, 1194-1205.
48. Prince SD, Olson RJ, Dedieu G et al. (1995) Global primary production data initiative project description IGBP-DIS Working paper No. 12.
49. Raich JW, Nadelhoffer KJ (1989) Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems; global trends. Ecology, 70, 1346-1354.
50. Rastetter EB (1996) Validating models of ecosystem responses to global change. Bioscience, 46, 190-198.
51. Ruimy A, Kergoat L, Bondeau A et al. (1999) Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity: analysis of differences in light use efficiency. Global Change Biology, 5 (Suppl. 1), 56-64.
52. Sala OE, Parton WJ, Joyce LA et al. (1988) Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology, 69, 40-45.
53. 2 and the carbon cycle. In: Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and an Evaluation of the IPCC Is92 Emission Scenarios (eds Houghton J, Meira-Filho LG, Bruce J, Lee H, Callander BA, Haites E, Harris N, Maskell K), pp. 35-72. Cambridge University Press, New York.
54. Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR (1955) The water balance. Climatology, 8, 1-86.
55. Tieszen L, Reed BC, Dejong DD (1997) NDVI, C3 and C4 production, and distributions in the Great Plains grassland cover classes. Ecological Applications, 7, 59-78.
56. Titlyanova AA, Romanova LP, Kosykh NP et al. (1999) Patterns and process in above-ground and below-ground components of grassland ecosystems. Journal of Vegetation Science, 10, 307-320.
57. Turner DP, Cohen WB, Kennedy RE (2000) Alternative spatial resolutions and estimates of carbon flux over a managed forest landscape in Western Oregon. Landscape Ecology, 15, 441-452.
58. Turner DP, Koerper GJ, Hanmon ME et al. (1995) A carbon budget for forests of the conterminous United States. Ecological Applications, 5, 421-436.
59. Turner J, Long JN (1975) Accumulation of organic matter in a series of Douglas-fir stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 5, 681-690.
60. USDA (1981) Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States USDA 296.
61. 2 doubling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 9, 407-437.
62. Vogt K (1991) Carbon budgets of temperate forest ecosystems. Tree Physiology, 9, 69-86.
63. Waring RH, Schlesinger WH (1985) Forest Ecosystems: Concept and Management. Academic Press, Orlando.
64. Wharton EH, Alerich AL, Drake DA (1997) Estimating total forest biomass in New York, 1993. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experimental Station NE-139.
65. Wharton EH, Griffith DM (1998) Estimating total forest biomass in Maine, 1995. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experimental Station NE-142.
66. Whittaker RH, Likens GE (1975) The biosphere and man. In: Primary Production of the Biosphere (eds Lieth H, Whittaker RH), pp. 305-328. Springer-Verlag, New York.
67. Wolter PT, Mladenoff DJ, Host GE et al. (1995) Improved forest classification in the northern lake states using multi-temporal Landsat imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61, 1129-1143.
68. Woods KD, Fieveson AH, Botkin DB (1991) Statistical error analysis for biomass density and leaf area index estimation. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research, 21, 974-989.
69. Woudenberg SW, Farrenkopf TO (1995) The westwide forest inventory data base: users manual. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station INT-GT-317.
70. Wu Z (1980) Chinese Vegetation. Science Press, Beijing.
71. Zheng D, Prince SD, Hame T (2001) Estimating gridded net primary production of boreal forests in Finland and Sweden from field data and remotely sensed biomass. Journal of Vegetation Science, Submitted.