Mapping variable - Width streamside management zones for water quality protection

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 24, Issue 4-5, 2003, Pages 329-336

  Williams, Thomas M ^a   Lipscomb, Donald J ^a   English, William R ^a   Nickel, Christopher ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Geographic information system; Southeastern USA; Streamside management zone; Water quality

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HARVESTING; MAPPING; WATER QUALITY;

STREAMSIDE MANAGEMENT;

FORESTRY;

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; FORESTRY; GIS; MAPPING; WATER QUALITY;

FORESTRY; GIS; HARVESTING; MAPPING; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 0037239923     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00168-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Williams TM, Hook DD, Lipscomb DJ, Zeng X, Albiston JW. Effectiveness of Best Management Practices to Protect Water Quality in the South Carolina Piedmont, p. 271-7. In the Tenth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, 2000, USDA For. Serv., South. Res. Stat., Gen. Technical Report SRS-30.
2. Frazee JW. Effects of forest harvesting best management practices on surface water quality in the Virginia coastal plain. MS Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1996, 210p.
3. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Biological assessment of effectiveness of forestry best management practices. Bureau of Laboratories, Division of Administrative and Technical Services, Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Tallahassee, FL, 1997. 18p.
4. South Carolina Forestry Commission. South Carolina's Best Management Practices in Forestry. SC Forestry Commission, Columbia, SC, 1994. 61p.
5. Springer JW, Perkins C. Kentucky forest practice guidelines. Cooperative Extension Service, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 1997. 89p.
6. Williams TM, Lipscomb DJ. Incorporating historical aerial photography into a rectified GIS forest inventory system. In: Arthaud GJ, Hubbard WC editors. SoFor GIS '96, Proceedings Southern Forestry Geographic Information Systems Conference. Athens, GA: Univ. of Georgia, 1996. p. 292-302.
7. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. South Carolina Non-point Source Management Program; 1999 Update. Bureau of Water, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia, SC, 1999. 175p.
8. Lenat DR. A biotic index for the southeastern United States: Derivation and list of tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water quality ratings. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 1993;12:279-90.
9. Virginia Department of Forestry. Virginia BMP guide for forestry. Virginia Department of Forestry, Charlottesville, VA, 1997. 9p.
10. North Carolina Division of Forest Resources. Forestry best management practices manual. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Forest Resources, Raleigh, NC, 1989. 79p.
11. Georgia Forestry Commission. Georgia's Best Management Practices for Forestry. Georgia Forestry Commission, Macon, GA, 1999. 71p.
12. Tennessee Division of Forestry. Guides to forestry best management practices. Tennessee Department of Agriculture. Division of Forestry, Nashville, TN, 1993. 41p.
13. Mississippi Forestry Commission. Best management practices for forestry in Mississippi. MFC Publication #107. Mississippi Forestry Commission, Jackson, MS, 2000. 30p.