Outcome in patients with chronic sinusitis afte the minimally invasive sinus technique

American Journal of Rhinology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 17-22

  Catalano, Peter ^a   Roffman, Eric ^a  

^a LAHEY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; DECONGESTIVE AGENT; MUCOLYTIC AGENT; STEROID;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHRONIC SINUSITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ETHMOIDECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NOSE SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOM; TIME; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037237869     PISSN: 10506586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/194589240301700104     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Setliff RC. Minimally invasive sinus surgery: the rationale and the technique. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 29:115-129, 1996.
2. Catalano PJ, Setliff RC, Catalano LA: Minimally invasive sinus surgery in the geriatric patient. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 12(2):85-90, 2001.
3. Setliff RC, and Parsons DS. The Hummer: new instrumentation for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 8:275-278, 1994.
4. Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ, Rosenbaum AE, and Johns ME. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: theory and diagnostic evaluation. Arch Otolaryngol 111:576-582, 1985.
5. Stammberger H. Endoscopic nasal surgery-concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part I: Anatomic and pathophysiologic considerations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 94:143-147, 1986.
6. Stammberger H, and Posawitz W. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: concept, indications, and results of the Messerklinger technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 247:63-76, 1990.
7. Moses RL, Cornetta A, Atkins JP: Revision endoscopic sinus surgery: the Thomas Jefferson University experience. ENT Journal, 77(3):190-202, 1998.
8. Rice D. Endoscopic sinus surgery: results at 2-year follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 101:467-479, 1989.
9. Levine H. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: evaluation, surgery, and follow-up of 250 patients. Laryngoscope 100:79-84, 1990.
10. Kennedy DW. Prognostic factors, outcomes, and staging in ethmoid sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 102:1-18, 1992.
11. Vleming M, and de Vries N. Endoscopic paranasal sinus surgery: results. Am J Rhinol 4:13-17, 1990.
12. Smith LF, and Brindley PC. Indications, evaluation, complications, and results of functional endoscopic sinus surgery in 200 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 108:688-696, 1993.
13. Schaitkin B, May M, and Shapiro A. Endoscopic sinus surgery: 4-year follow-up on the first 100 patients. Laryngoscope 103: 117-120, 1993.
14. Gliklich RE, and Metson R. Techniques for outcomes research in chronic sinusitis. Laryngoscope 105:387-390, 1995.
15. Gliklich RE, and Metson R. Effect of sinus surgery on quality of life. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:12-17, 1997.
16. Jones ML, Piccirillo JF, Haiduk A, and Thawley SE. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: do ratings of appropriateness predict patient outcomes. Am J Rhinol 12:249-255, 1998.
17. Lanza DC, and Kennedy DW. Adult rhinosinusitis defined. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:S1-S7, 1997.
18. Gliklich R, and Metson R. A comparison of sinus computed tomography (CT) staging systems for outcomes research. Am J Rhinol 8:291-297, 1994.
19. Gliklich RE, and Metson R. The Chronic Sinusitis Survey and the Chronic Sinusitis Survey Scoring Booklet. Boston, MA: Outcome Sciences, Inc., 1996.
20. Marks SC, and Shamsa F. Evaluation of prognostic factors in endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 11:187-191, 1997.
21. Matthews BL, Smith LE, Jones R, et al. Endoscopic sinus surgery: outcome in 155 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 104: 244-246, 1991.