Adultery, drugs, and sex: An experimental investigation of individual reactions to unethical behavior by public officials

Social Science Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 65-78

  Maule, Linda S ^a   Goidel, Robert K ^a  

^a INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037234569     PISSN: 03623319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0362-3319(02)00259-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alexander, D., & Andersen, K. (1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 527-545.
2. Barone, M., & Ujifusa, G. (1999). The almanac of American politics, 1998. Washington D.C.: National Journal.
3. Capelos, T., & Huddy, L. (1999). Scandal immunity as a function of candidate gender and personality traits. Paper presented at the annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA, USA.
4. Carroll, S. (1985). Women as a candidate in American politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
5. Darcy, R., Welch S., & Clark, J. (1987). Women, elections, and representation. New York: Longman.
6. Eckstrand, L., & Eckert, W. (1981, March). The impact of the candidates sex on voter choice. Western Political Quarterly, 78-87.
7. Fick, B. (1998). Clinton critic admits affair; GOP hard-liner confesses. The Buffalo News, p. 4A.
8. Funk, C. (1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior, 18(1), 1-24.
9. Huddy, L.,& Terkildsen, N. (1993a). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 119-147.
10. Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993b). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly, 503-525.
11. Kahn, K. (1992). Does being male help? An investigation of the effects of candidate gender and campaign coverage on the evaluations of U.S. Senate candidates. Journal of Politics, 54, 496-516.
12. Kahn, K. (1993). Gender difference in campaign messages: The political advertisements of men and women candidates for U.S. Senate. Political Research Quarterly, 481-501.
13. Kahn, K. (1994). The distorted mirror: Press coverage of women candidates for statewide office. Journal of Politics, 56, 154-173.
14. Leeper, M. S. (1991). The impact of prejudice on female candidates: An experimental look at voter inference. American Politics Quarterly, 19, 248-261.
15. Lindgren, J., & Taub, N. (1993). The law of sex discrimination. New York: West Publishing Company.
16. McDermott, M. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 895-918.
17. Pei-Te Lien. (1998). Does the gender gap in political attitudes and behavior vary across racial groups? Political Research Quarterly, Salt Lake City; 51 (4), 869-994.
18. Peters, J. G.,& Welch, S. (1978). Political corruption in America: A search for definitions and a theory or if political corruption is the mainstream of American politics why is it not in the mainstream of American politics research. American Political Science Review, 72, 974-984.
19. Petersen, D., & Hunter, H. (1997, January 18). For women politicians, a different standard of ethics. Star Tribune, p. 21A.
20. Riggle, E., Miller, P., & Shields, T. (1997). Gender stereotypes and decision context in the evaluation of political candidates. Women & Politics, 17, 69-88.
21. Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J.,& Marcus, G. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Thomas, S. (1994). How women legislate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Welch, S., & Hibbing, R. (1997). The effects of charges of corruption on voting behavior in congressional elections, 1982-1990. Journal of Politics, 59(1), 226-235.
24. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Zipp, J., & Plutzer, E. (1985). Gender difference in voting for female candidates: Evidence from the 1982 election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 179-197.