Suitability of kiwi (Actinidia sinensis Planch.) prunings for particleboard manufacturing

Industrial Crops and Products

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 39-46

  Nemli, Gökay ^a   Kirci, Hüseyin ^a   Serdar, Bedri ^a   Ay, Nurgül ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Anatomical descriptions; Chemical properties; Kiwi prunings; Mechanical properties; Particleboard; Physical properties

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL PROPERTY; MANUFACTURING; PRUNING; TIMBER;

TURKEY;

ACTINIDIA; ACTINIDIA CHINENSIS; ACTINIDIA DELICIOSA; AVES; FRAXINUS; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO;

EID: 0037233890     PISSN: 09266690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6690(02)00057-2     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Akbulut, T., 1995. Effects of some factors on the properties of particleboard. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey (in Turkish).
2. Au, K.C., Gertjejansen, R.O., 1989. Influence of wafer thickness and resin spread on the properties of paper Birch waferboard. Forest Prod. J. 39 (4), 47-50.
3. Colakoǧlu, G., Kalaycioǧlu, H., Ors, Y., 1993. Usage of Pinus Brutia Bark in Particleboard and Plywood Industry (in Turkish). International Pinus Brutia Symposium, Marmaris, Turkey, pp. 700-711.
4. Committee on Nomenclature, 1964. Multi lingual glossary of terms used in wood Anatomy. IAWA Bulletin.
5. EN 310, 1993. Wood based panels, determination of modulus of elasticity in bending and bending strength. European Standardization Committee, Brussell.
6. EN 312-2, 1996. Particleboards-specifications-part 2: requirements for general purpose boards for use in dry conditions. European Standardization Committee, Brussell.
7. EN 312-3, 1996. Particleboards-specifications-part 3: requirements for boards for interior fitments (including furniture) for use in dry conditions. European Standardization Committee, Brussell.
8. EN 312-4, 1996. Particleboards-specifications-part 4: requirements for load-bearing boards for use in dry conditions. European Standardization Committee, Brussell.
9. EN 312-6, 1996. Particleboards-specifications-part 6: requirements for heavy-duty load-bearing boards for use in dry conditions. European Standardization Committee, Brussell.
10. EN 317, 1993. Particleboards and fiberboards, determination of swelling in thickness after immersion. European Standardization Committee, Brussell.
11. EN 319, 1993. Particleboards and fiberboards, determination of tensile strength perpendicular to plane of the board. European Standardization Committee, Brussell.
12. E.P.F., 1969. Manipulations de Chimie Papetiere, Grenoble.
13. Eroǧlu, H., 1988. Fiberboard Industry. No: 304 (in Turkish). Karadeniz Technical University Publication, Trabzon-Turkey.
14. Geimer, R.L., 1979. Data basic to the engineering design of reconstituted flakeboard. In: Proceedings of the WSU Symposium on Particleboard. Pullman, Washington, pp. 104-125.
15. Hall, H.J., Gertjajensen, R.O., Schmidt, E.L., Carl, C.G., DeGroot, R.C., 1984. Preservative effect on mechanical and thickness swelling properties of Aspen wafer board. In: Proceeding of a Workshop on Durability of Str. Panels. Pencacola, Florida, USA.
16. Han, G., Zhang, C., Zhang, D., Umerra, D., Kawai, S., 1998. Upgrading of urea formaldehyde bonded reed and wheat straw particleboard using silane coupling agents. J. Wood Sci. 44, 282-286.
17. Hofstrand, A.D., Moslemi, A.A., Garcia, J.F., 1984. Curing characteristics of wood particles from nine northern rocky mountains species mixed with portland cement. Forest Prod. J. 34 (7), 57-61.
18. Ives, E., 2001. A Guide to Wood Microtermy; Making Quality Microslides of Wood Sections, Ipswich, Suffolk IP8 3 AY, UK.
19. Jain, N.C., Gupta, R.C., Jain, D.K., 1967. Particleboard from groundnut shells. Proceedings of 11th Silviculture Conference, May 1967, India.
20. Kalaycioǧlu, H., Nemli, G., 1997. Properties of structural particleboard prepared from the bark of Pinus brutia. Proceedings of the XI World Forestry Congress. 13-22 October 1997, Antalya, Turkey, p. 50.
21. Khristova, P., Yussifou, N., Gabir, S., Glavche, I., Osman, Z., 1998. Particleboards from sunflower stalks and tannin modified UF resin. Cell. Chem. Technol. 32, 327-337.
22. Kollmann, F., 1951. Technolgie Des Holzes Der Workstoffe, vol. 1, second ed.. Springer, Berlin, Göttingen.
23. Kollmann, F., 1951. Technolgie Des Holzes Der Workstoffe, vol. 1, second ed.. Springer, Berlin, Göttingen.
24. Kollmann, F., 1966. Holzspanwerkstoffe, holzpanplatten und holzspanformlinge rohstoffe, herstellung, plankosten qualitatskotrolle USW. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
25. Kozlowski, R., Helwig, M., 1998. Lignocellulosic polymer composite. In: Prasad, P.N. (Ed.), Science and Technology of Polymers and Advanced Materials. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 679-698.
26. Kuo, M., Adams, D., Myers, D., Curry, D., heemstra, K., Smith, J., Bian, Y., 1998. Properties of wood agricultural fiberboard bonden with soybean-based adhesives. Forest Prod. J. 48 (2), 71-75.
27. Lehman, W.F., 1965. Improved particleboard through better resin efficiency. Forest Prod. J. 15, 155-161.
28. Lehman, W.F., 1970. Resin efficiency in particleboard as influenced by density, atomization and resin content. Forest Prod. J. 20 (11), 48-54.
29. Liu, J.Y., Mcnatt, J.D., 1991. Thickness swelling and density variation in aspen flakeboards. Wood Sci. Technol. 82, 25-33.
30. MacCleery, R., 1995. Resiliency the trade mark of American forests. Forest Prod. J. 45, 19-28.
31. Maloney, T., 1977. Modern Particleboard and Dry-Process Fiberboard Manufacturing. Miller Freeman Publications, SanFransisco/California.
32. May, H.A., 1983. Relations between properties raw materials and the distribution of density in particleboards.part 4: effects of density differences and raw materials on tensile strength perpendicular to board surface and on shear strength. Holzals Roh Werkstoff 41, 271-275.
33. Merev, N., 1998. Anatomy of the angiospermae woods in Black Sea Region of Turkey. vol. 1, Faculty Publication No: 27, ISBN 975-6983-04-03 (in Turkish).
34. Metcalfe, C.R., Chalk, L., 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, vol. 1, first ed.. Oxford University Press, London.
35. Mitlin, L., 1968. Particleboard Manufacture and Application. Novello & Co. Ltd, Kent.
36. Mosesson, J.G., 1980. The processing and use of waste straw as a constructional material. Conserv. Recycl. 3, 389-412.
37. Nemli, G., 2000. Effects of surface coating materials and process parameters on the technological properties of particleboards. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Forestry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (in Turkish).
38. Nemli, G., Kalaycioǧlu, H., 1997. An alternative material in particleboard industry: residues of tea factory. Proceedings of the XI World Forestry Congress, vol. 4, Antalya, Turkey, p. 49.
39. Normand, D., 1973. Cour D' Anatomie du. Bois. Paris, Ecole Superieur du Bois, p. 83.
40. Ntalos, G.A., Grigoriou, A.H., 2002. Characterization and utilisation of Wine prunings as a wood substitute for particleboard production. Industrial Crops and Products 16 (1), 59-68.
41. Prasetya, B., 1989. Untersuchungen über die aciditat von rinden einiger nadelbaumarten, magisterarbeit für das aufbaustadium der forstwissenchaften in den tropen und subtropen an der forstlichen fakultat der georg-August-Universitat Göttingen.
42. Ramaker, T.J., Lehman, W.F., 1976. High performance structural flakeboardsfrom Douglas-fir and Lodgepolepine forest residues. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper, FPL 286, Madison, WI.
43. Rexen, F., 1975. Straw as a raw material for particleboard and paper production. In: T.R. Miles (Ed.), Report on the First World Straw Conference, Eugene, OR.
44. Rowell, R.M., Norimoto, M., 1988. Dimensional stability of bamboo particleboards made from acetylated particles. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 34 (7), 627-629.
45. Sampathrajan, A., Vijayaraghavan, N.C., Swaminathan, K.R., 1992. Mechanical and thermal properties of particleboards made from farm residues. Bioresour. Technol. 40, 249-251.
46. Schneider, A., Roffael, E., May, A.H., 1982. untersuchungen über den einflub von rohdichte, bindemittelaufwond und spane-beschaffenheit auf das sorptionsverhalten und die dickenquellung von holzspanplatten. Holz als Roh Werkstoff 40, 339-344.
47. Sun, R.C., Tomkinson, J., 2000. Essential guides for isolation/purification of polysaccharides. Encylopaedia Sep. Sci. 6, 4568-4574.
48. T 204 om, 1988. Solvent extractives of wood and pulp, TAPPI.
49. T 207 om, 1988. Water solubility of wood and pulp, TAPPI.
50. T 212 om, 1988. One percent sodium hydroxide solubility of wood and pulp, TAPPI.
51. T 211 om, 1988. Ash in wood and pulp, TAPPI.
52. T 257 om, 1985. Sampling and preparing wood for analysis, TAPPI.
53. Turreda, L.D., 1983. Bagasse, wood and wood-bagasse particleboards bonded with urea formaldehyde and polyvinyl acetate/isocynate adhesives. USDA Technol. J. 8 (3), 66-78.
54. Unchi, S., 1996. Acetylation of Acacia magnum wood fibers and its application in the MDF manufacturing. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Forestry, University Pertanian, Pertainan, Malaysia.
55. Vasisth, R.C., Chandramouli, P., 1975. New panel boards from rice husks. FAO Background Paper, FO/WCWBP/75.
56. Wang, D., Sun, X.S., 2002. Low density particleboard from wheat straw and corn pith. Ind. Crops Prod. 15, 47-50.
57. Wise, L.E., John, E.C., 1952. Wood Chemistry, vol. I-II, second ed.. Reinhold Publication, New York.
58. Yalinkiliç, M.K., Imamura, Y., Takahashi, M., Kalaycioglu, H., Nemli, G., Demirci, Z., Özdemir, T., 1998. Biological, physical and mechanical properties of particleboard manufactured from waste tea leaves. Int. Biodeterioration Biodegration 41 (1), 75-84.
59. Yusuf, S., 1996. Properties enhancement of wood by crosslinking formation and its application to the reconstituted wood products. Ph.D. thesis, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.