Comparison of open- and closed-chest canine model for quantification of coronary stenosis severity by myocardial contrast echocardiography

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 44-50

  Masugata, Hisashi ^a   Peters, Barry ^b   Lafitte, Stephane ^b   Yao, Biguang ^b   Strachan, Monet ^b   Kwan, Ling Oi ^b   Ohmori, Koji ^b   Mizushige, Katsufumi ^b   Kohno, Masakazu ^b  

^a KAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Myocardial blood flow; Myocardial contrast echocardiography; Perfusion

Indexed keywords

FS 069;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOG; NONHUMAN; PERFUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THORAX; TIME; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 0037233561     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200301000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Grayburn PA, Erickson JM, Escobar J, et al. Peripheral intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography using a 2% dodecafluoropentane emulsion: Identification of myocardial risk area and infarct size in the canine model of ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:1340-1347.
2. Kaul S. Myocardial contrast echocardiography: 15 years of research and development. Circulation 1997;96:3745-3760.
3. Porter TR, Xie F. Transient myocardial contrast after initial exposure to diagnostic ultrasound pressures with minute doses of intravenously injected microbubbles. Demonstration and potential mechanisms. Circulation 1995;92:2391-2395.
4. Villanueva FS, Gertz EW, Csikari M, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with power Doppler imaging. Circulation 2001;103:2624-2630.
5. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation 1998;97:473-483.
6. Mor-Avi V, Caiani EG, Collins KA, et al. Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and regional left ventricular function by analysis of contrast-enhanced power modulation images. Circulation 2001;104:352-357.
7. Tiemann K, Lohmeier S, Kuntz S, et al. Real-time contrast echo assessment of myocardial perfusion at low emission power: first experimental and clinical results using power pulse inversion imaging. Echocardiography 1999;16:799-809.
8. Masugata H, Peters B, Lafitte S, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary stenosis by real-time myocardial contrast echo refilling curves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:262-269.
9. Porter TR, Xie F, Silver M, et al. Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:748-753.
10. Glenny RW, Bernard S, Brinkley M. Validation of fluorescent-labeled microspheres for measurement of regional organ perfusion. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:2585-2597.
11. Jayaweera AR, Wei K, Coggins M, et al. Role of capillaries in determining CBF reserve: New insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Am J Physiol 1999;277:H2363-2372.