Soilpsi: A potential-driven three-dimensional soil water redistribution model - Description and comparative evaluation

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 13-23

  Theseira, G W ^a   Host, G E ^a   Isebrands, J G ^b   Whisler, F D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ECOPHYS; Rhizosphere model; Root model; Soil model; Water flow; Water redistribution

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVAPORATION; MOISTURE; SOILS;

SOIL WATER REDISTRIBUTION MODELS;

WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS;

BIOLOGICAL UPTAKE; RHIZOSPHERE; SOIL WATER; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

POPULUS BEROLINENSIS;

EID: 0037232772     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(02)00040-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abamu, F.J., Akinsola, E.A., Alluri, K., 1998. Applying AMMI models to understand genotype-by-environment (G x E) interactions in rice reaction to blast disease in Africa. International Journal of Pest Management 44 (4), 239-245.
2. Abamu, F.J., Alluri, K., 1998. AMMI analysis of rainfed lowland rice (Oryza sativa) trials in Nigeria. Plant Breeding 117 (4), 395.
3. Acock, B., Reynolds, J.F. 1990. Model structure and data base development. In: Dixon, R.K., Meldahl, R.S., Ruark, G.A., Warren, W.G. (Eds.), Process Modeling of Forest Growth Responses to Environmental Stress. Timber Press Inc., Portland, OR, USA, pp. 169-179.
4. Acock, B., Trent, A., 1991. In: The Soybean Crop Simulator, GLY-CIM: Documentation for the Modular Version 91. Department of Plant, Soil and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Idaho, Moscow, 242.
5. Annicchiarico, P., 1997a. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of genotype-location interaction in variety trials repeated over the years. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94 (8), 1072.
6. Annicchiarico, P., 1997b. Joint regression vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-environment interactions for cereals in Italy. Euphytice; Netherlands Journal of Plant Breeding 94 (1), 53-62.
7. Baker, D.N., Lambert, J.R., McKinion, J.M., 1983. GOSSYM: a simulator of crop growth and yield. In: Technical Bulletin 1089. South Carolina Experiment Station, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA, 134.
8. Beven, K., Germann, P., 1982. Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resources Research 18, 1311-1325.
9. Boone, M.Y.L., Porter, D.O., McKinion, J.M., 1991. In: RHIZOS 1991: A Simulator of Row Crop Rhizospheres. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, ARS-113, USA, 180.
10. Bouten, W., Witter, J.V., 1992. Modeling soil water dynamics in a forested ecosystem II: evaluation of spatial variation of soil profiles. Hydrological Processes 6, 435-444.
11. Diggle, A.J., 1988. Rootmap: a root growth model. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 30, 175-180.
12. Falkenhagen, E., Funnah, S.M., Du Toit, W., 1996. A comparison between the linear regression and AMMI approaches to study multi-site trials using a sample of South African maize trials. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 13 (4), 103-109.
13. Flores, F., Moreno, M.T., Martinez, A., Cubero, J.I., 1996. Genotype-environment interaction in faba bean: comparison of AMMI and principal coordinate models. Field Crops Research 47 (2-3), 117-127.
14. Ghodrati, M., Jury, W.A., 1992. A field study of the effects of soil structure and irrigation method on preferential flow of pesticides in unsaturated soil. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 11, 101-125.
15. Glass, R.J., Parlange, J.Y., Steenhuis, T.S., 1989. Wetting front instability. 1. Theoretical discussion and dimensional analysis. Water Resources Research 25 (6), 1187-1194.
16. van Genuchten, M.T., 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 892-898.
17. van Genuchten, M.Th., Leij, F.J., Yates, S.R., 1991. The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils, Version 1.0. EPA Report 600/2-91/065, US Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Riverside, CA.
18. Hansen, E., 1990. Early yields of biomass plantations in the North Central United States. Res. Pap. NC-353. St. Paul, MN, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, 6 pp.
19. Hansen, E., 1992. Mid-rotation yields of biomass plantations in the North Central United States. Res. Pap. NC-309. St. Paul, MN, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, 8 pp.
20. Heijs, A.W.J., de Lange, J., Schoute, Th.J.F., Bouma, J., 1995. Computed tomography as a tool for non-destructive analysis of flow patterns in macroporous clay soils. Geoderma 65, 1-19.
21. Hillel, D., Baker, R.S., 1988. A descriptive theory of fingering during infiltration into layered soils. Soil Science 146, 51-56.
22. Hoogenboom, G., Jones, J.W., Boote, K.J., 1992. Modeling the growth, development and yield of grain legumes using SOYGRO, PNUT-GRO and BEANGRO: a review. Transactions of the ASAE 35 (6), 2043-2056.
23. Host, G.E., Isebrands, J.G., Theseira, G.W., Kiniry, J.R., Graham, R.L., 1996. Temporal and spatial scaling from individual trees to plantations: a modeling strategy. Biomass and Bioenergy 11, 233-243.
24. Host, G.E., Theseira, G.W., Heim, C., Isebrands, J.G., Graham, R., 1999. EPIC-ECOPHYS: a linkage of empirical and process models for simulating poplar plantation growth. In: Amaro, A., Tome, M. (Eds.), Empirical and Process Models for Forest Tree and Stand Growth Simulation. Edicos Salamandra, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 419-429.
25. Isebrands, J.G., Host, G.E., Lenz, K.E., Wu, G., Stech, H.W., 2000. Hierarchical, parallel computing strategies using component object model for process modelling responses of forest plantations to interacting multiple stresses. In: Cuelemans, R.J.M., Veroustraete, F., Gond, V., Van Rensbergen, J.B.H.F. (Eds.), Forest Ecosystem Modeling, Upscaling, and Remote Sensing. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp. 123-135.
26. Jones, C.A., Kiniry, J.R., 1986. CERES-Maize: A Simulation Model of Maize Growth and Development. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX.
27. Li, Y., Ghodrati, M., 1995. Preferential transport of nitrate in soils as affected by earthworm activities. Journal of Environmental Quality 24 (3), 432-438.
28. Marani, A., Cardon, G.E., Phene, C.J., 1992. CALGOS, a version of GOSSYM adapted for irrigated cotton. I. Drip irrigation, soil water transport and root growth. In: Proceedings, Beltwide Cotton Conference, Nashville, TN, January 6-10, vol. 3, pp. 1352-1357.
29. Milliken, G., Johnson, D., 1989. In: Analysis of Messy Data, vol. 2. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 199pp.
30. Oritz, R., 1996. The potential of AMMI analysis for field assessment of Musa genotypes to virus infection. Hortscience 31 (5), 829-832.
31. Rauscher, H.M., Isebrands, J.G., Host, G.E., Dickson, R.E., Dickmann, D.I., Crow, T.R., Michael, D.A., 1990. ECOPHYS: an ecophysiological growth process model of poplar. Tree Physiology 7, 255-281.
32. Richardson, C.W., Wright, D.A., 1984. In: WGEN: A Model for Generating Daily Weather Variables. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC, 88 (ARS-8).
33. Schuster, E.G., Leefers, L.A., Thompson, J.E., 1993. A guide to computer-based analytical tools for implementing national forest plans. USDA-FS General Technical Report INT-296, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.
34. Sharpe, P.J.H., 1990. Forest modeling approaches: compromises between generality and precision. In: Dixon, R.K., Meldahl, R.S., Ruark, G.A., Warren, W.G. (Eds.), Process Modeling of Forest Growth Responses to Environmental Stress. Timber Press Inc., Portland, OR, USA, pp. 180-190.
35. Shinozaki, K., Yoda, K., Hozumi, K., Kira, T., 1964. A quantitative analysis of plant form - the pipe model theory II. Further evidence of the theory and its application in forest ecology. Japanese Journal of Ecology 14 (4), 133-139.
36. Sinclair, T.R., 1991. Water deficit effects on maize yields modeled under current and "greenhouse" climates. Agronomy Journal 83 (6), 1052-1059.
37. Theseira, G.W., 1994. Development and testing of an amended GOS-SYM model for simulation of asymmetric inputs about the crop row (cotton). PhD dissertation, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS.
38. Willers, J.L., Wagner, T.L., Sequeira, R.A., Theseira, G.W., Boykin, D.L., 1995. Analysis of deterministic simulation models using methods applicable to two-way treatment structures without replication. Agronomy Journal 87 (1), 478-492.
39. Williams, J.R., Dyke, P.T., Jones, C.A., 1983. EPIC: a model for assessing the effects of erosion on soil productivity. In: Laurenroth, W.K. (Ed.), Analysis of Ecological Systems: State-of-the-Art in Ecological Modeling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 553-572.
40. Yadav, R., Tyagi, B.S., Horan, J., 1998. AMMI analysis of wheat varietal yield trials. Crop Improvement 25 (1), 105.