A holistic finite difference approach models linear dynamics consistently

Mathematics of Computation

Volumn 71, Issue 241, 2003, Pages 247-262

  Roberts, A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037232578     PISSN: 00255718     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J. Carr. Applications of centre manifold theory, volume 35 of Applied Math. Sci. Springer-Verlag, 1981. MR 83g:34039
2. J. Carr and R. G. Muncaster. The application of centre manifold theory to amplitude expansions. II. Infinite dimensional problems. J. Diff. Eqns, 50:280-288, 1983. MR 85d:58057b
3. P. Constantin, C. Foias, B. Nicolaenko, and R. Temam. Integral manifolds and inertial manifolds for dissipative partial differential equations, volume 70 of Applied Math. Sci. Springer-Verlag, 1989. MR 90a:35026
4. S. M. Cox and A. J. Roberts. Initial conditions for models of dynamical systems. Physica D, 85:126-141, 1995. MR 96e:34072
5. C. Foias, M. S. Jolly, I. G. Kevrekedis, G. R. Sell, and E. S. Titi. On the computation of inertial manifolds. Phys Lett. A, 131:433-436, 1988.
6. C. Foias, M. S. Jolly, I. G. Kevrekidis, and E. S. Titi. Dissipativity of numerical schemes. Nonlinearity, 4:591-613, 1991. MR 89k:65154
7. C. Foias, G. R. Sell, and E. S. Titi. Exponential tracking and approximation of inertial manifolds for dissipative nonlinear equations. J. Dyn. & Diff. Eqns, 1:199-244, 1989. MR 90k:35031
8. C. Foias and E. S. Titi. Determining nodes, finite difference schemes and inertial manifolds. Nonlinearity, 4:135-153, 1991. MR 92a:65241
9. B. García-Archilla and E. S. Titi. Postprocessing the Galerkin method: the finite element case. SIAM J. Num. Anal., 37:470-499, 2000. MR 2001h:65112
10. M. S. Jolly, I. G. Kevrekidis, and E. S. Titi. Approximate inertial manifolds for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation: analysis and computations. Physica D, 44:38-60, 1990. MR 91f:35217
11. T. Mackenzie and A. J. Roberts. Holistic finite differences accurately model the dynamics of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. ANZIAM J., 42(E):C918-C935, 2000. [Online] http://anziamj.austms.org.au/V42/CTAC99/Mack.
12. M. Marion and R. Temam. Nonlinear Galerkin methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 26(5):1139-1157, 1989. MR 91a:65220
13. National Physical Laboratory. Modern Computing Methods, 2nd ed., volume 16 of Notes on Applied Science. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, 1961. MR 22:8637
14. A. J. Roberts. Appropriate initial conditions for asymptotic descriptions of the long term evolution of dynamical systems. J. Austral. Math. Soc. B, 31:48-75, 1989. MR 90h:58075
15. A. J. Roberts. The utility of an invariant manifold description of the evolution of a dynamical system. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 20:1447-1458, 1989. MR 91f:58088
16. A. J. Roberts. Low-dimensional models of thin film fluid dynamics.Phys. Letts. A, 212:63-72, 1996. MR 97b:76041
17. A. J. Roberts. Computer algebra derives correct initial conditions for low-dimensional dynamical models. Comput. Phys. Comm., 126(3):187-206, 2000.
18. A. J. Roberts. Holistic discretisation ensures fidelity to Burgers' equation. Applied Numerical Math., 37:371-396, 2001.
19. J. C. Robinson. The asymptotic completeness of inertial manifolds. Nonlinearity, 9:1325-1340, 1996. MR 98m:34124
20. R. Temam. Inertial manifolds. Mathematical Intelligencer, 12:68-74, 1990. MR 91i:58087
21. A. Vanderbauwhede. Centre manifolds, normal forms and elementary bifurcations. Dynamics Reported, pages 89-169, 1989. MR 90g:58092