Voting method for the detection of subpixel flow field

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volumn 24, Issue 1-3, 2003, Pages 197-214

  Imiya, Atsushi ^a,b   Iwawaki, Keisuke ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

^b CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Hough transform; Model fitting; Optical flow; Random algorithms; Subpixel analysis

Indexed keywords

IMAGE PROCESSING; SAMPLING; VECTORS;

SUBPIXEL FLOW FIELD;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

DETECTION METHOD;

EID: 0037230851     PISSN: 01678655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8655(02)00212-X     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anandan, P., 1989. A computational framework and an algorithm for the measurement of visual motion. International Journal of Computer Vision 2, 283-381.
2. Barron, J.L., Fleet, D.J., Beauchemin, S.S., 1992. Performance of optical flow techniques, Report No. 299, ISBN 0-7714-1336-X, University of Western Ontario.
3. Barron, J.L., Fleet, D.J., Beauchemin, S.S., 1994. Performance of optical flow techniques. International Journal of Computer Vision 12, 43-77.
4. Beauchemin, S.S., Barron, J.L., 1995. The computation of optical flow. ACM Computer Surveys 26, 433-467.
5. Campbell, S.L., Meyer Jr., C.D., 1991. Generalized Inverse of Linear Transformation. Dover Edition, Dover, New York.
6. Fermüller, C., Shulman, D., Aloimonos, Y., 2001. The statistics of optical flow. CVIU 82, 1-32.
7. Fleet, D.J., Jepson, A.D., 1990. Computation of components image velocity from a local phase information. International Journal of Computer Vision 5, 77-104.
8. Heikkonen, J., 1995. Recovering 3-D motion parameters from optical flow field using randomized Hough transform. Pattern Recognition Letters 15, 971-978.
9. Horn, B.K.P., Schunck, B.G., 1981. Determining optical flow. Artificial Intelligence 17, 185-204.
10. Imiya, A., Fermin, I., 1999a. Voting method for planarity and motion detection. Image and Vision Computing 17, 867-879.
11. Imiya, A., Fermin, I., 1999b. Motion analysis by random sampling and voting process. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 73, 309-328.
12. Kanatani, K., 1997. Statistical optimization and geometric inference in computer vision. Philosopical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 356, 1308-1320.
13. Kälviäinen, H., Oja, E., Xu, L., 1992. Randomized Hough transform applied to translation and rotation motion analysis, In: 11th IAPR Proceedings of International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 672-675.
14. 2 estimation and the Huber M-estimator. SIAM Journal of Optimization 8, 457-475.
15. Mangasarian, O.L., Musicant, D.R., 2000. Robust linear and support vector regression. IEEE PAMI 22, 950-955.
16. Mount, D.M., Netanyahu, N.S., 2001. Efficient randomized algorithms for robust estimation of circular arcs and aligned ellipses. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications 19, 1-33.
17. Nagel, H.-H., 1987. On the estimation of optical flow: Relations between different approaches and some new results. Artificial Intelligence 33, 299-324.
18. Oja, E., Xu, L., Kultanen, P., 1990. Curve detection by an extended self-organization map and related RHT method. In: Proceedings of International Neural Network Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 27-30.
19. Rao, C.R., Mitra, S.K., 1971. Generalized Inverse of Matrices and its Applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York, Japanese Edition, Tokyo Tosho, Tokyo 1973.
20. Sen, P.K., 1968. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kandell's tau. American Statistical Association Jouranl 63, 1379-1389.