The value of certification: An empirical assessment of the perceptions of end-users of local area networks

Information Systems Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 97-107

  Cegielski, Casey G ^a   Rebman, Carl M ^b   Reithel, Brian J ^c  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

Information systems network; Professional certification; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

END-USERS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

LOCAL AREA NETWORKS;

EID: 0037229369     PISSN: 13501917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2003.00140.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abeysundara, B. & Kamal, A. (1991) High-speed local area networks and their performance: a survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 23 (2), 221-264.
2. Adams, D., Nelson, R. & Todd, P. (1992) Perceived usefulness, ease of use and usage of information technology: a replication. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 16 (2), 227-247.
3. Biagioni, E., Cooper, E. & Sanson, R. (1993) Designing a Practical ATM LAN. IEEE Network, 7 (1), 24-37.
4. Chau, P. (1996) An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13 (2), 185-205.
5. Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. LEA Press, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. Davis, F. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of. information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13 (3), 318-339.
7. Fenech, T. (1998) Using perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness to predict user acceptance of the World Wide Web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30 (7), 629-630.
8. Hammond, J. & O'Reilly, P. (1986) Performance Analysis of Local Computer Networks, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
9. Haskell, T. (1984) The Authority of Experts Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
10. Hu, P. & Chau, P. (1999) Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91-112.
11. Kellogg, R. (1995) Cognitive Psychology. Sage, Thousand Oak, CA.
12. Mathieson, K. (1991) Predicting user Intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2 (3), 171-191.
13. O'Keefe, S. & Masud, S. (1999) Who has the winning strategy? Telecommunications. 33 (4), 18-23.
14. Passmore, D. (2000) Ethernet: not just for LANs anymore. Business Communications Review, 30 (7), 18-20.
15. Perks, R. (1993) Accounting and Society. Chapman & Hall, New York.
16. Prencipe, L. (2000) Network administrators. Infoworld, 22 (34), 77.
17. Roy, R. & MacNeill, J. (1967) Horizons for a Profession. AICPA, New York.
18. Sagar, W. (1995) Characteristics of a profession. National Public Accountant, 40 (3), 6-8.
19. Stallings, W. (1997) Local and Metropolitan Area Networks. Prentice Hall, Up Saddle River, NJ.
20. Szajna, B. (1994) Software evaluation and choice: predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 18 (3), 319-325.
21. Venkatesh, V. & Morris, M. (2000) Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24 (1), 115-140.
22. Watson, S. (2000) The best jobs. Computerworld, 34 (14), 46-48.
23. Williamson, M. (1997) Paying through the nose. Computerworld, 31 (46), 89-92.