Trajectories of fertility and household composition in the demographic profile of the Czech Republic

Population and Environment

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 225-254

  Rychtařiková, Jitka ^a   Akkerman, Abraham ^b  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Census; Czech; Fertility; Household; Matrix

Indexed keywords

BIRTH RATE; HOUSEHOLD STRUCTURE; HOUSING CONDITIONS; POPULATION STRUCTURE;

CZECH REPUBLIC;

EID: 0037227660     PISSN: 01990039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021287827173     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abernethy, V.D. & Penaloza, R. V. (2002). Fertility decline in former "Asian tigers," Population and Environment, 23, 245-265.
2. Akkerman, A. (2000). On the Leontief structure of household populations, Canadian Studies in Population, 27, 181-193.
3. Akkerman, A. (1996). A problem in household composition, Mathematical Population Studies, 6, 3-18.
4. Anderson, B.A. (2002). Russia faces depopulation? Dynamics of population decline, Population and Environment, 23, 437-464.
5. Bartlett, H.P. & Phillips, D.R. (1995). Aging in the United Kingdom: a review of demographic trends, recent policy developments and care provision, Korea Journal of Population and Development, 24, 181-195.
6. Bongaarts, J. (2001). Household size and composition in the developing world in the 1990s. Population Studies, 55, 263-279.
7. Bonvalet, C. & Lelièvre, E. (1997). The transformation of housing and household structures in France and Great Britain, International Journal of Population Geography, 3, 183-201.
8. Caselli, G., & Vallin, J. (2001). Une démographie sans limite?, Population, 56, 51-84.
9. Congdon, P. (1994). Spatiotemporal analysis of area mortality, Statistician, 43, 513-528.
10. Council of Europe (1990). Household Structures in Europe, Population Studies No. 22. Council of Europe: Strasbourg.
11. Český statistický úřad (2001). Předběžné výsledky sèítání lidu, domů a bytů k 1.3.2001 (Preliminary results of the census of population and housing, March 1, 2001), Publication Code: 4101-01, Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
12. Český statistický úřad (1950-1999). Pohyb obyvatelstva (Annual publications, Population movement). Prague: Czech or Czechoslovak or Federal Statistical Office.
13. Český statistický úřad (1995). Sèítání lidu, domů a bytů 1991-Pramenné dílo (Census of population and housing 1991-sources), Serial Number: 8, Series: 25-SLDB, Publication Code 2501. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
14. Český statistický úřad (1993). Úmrtnostní tabulky za ČSFR, ČR a SR za rok 1991 (Life tables for Czechoslovakia, Czech and Slovak Republics in 1991). Česká statistika 4-Demografile. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
15. Český statistický úřad (1982). Sèítání lidu, domů a bytů 1980 (Census of population and housing, 1980), November. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
16. Český statistický úřad (1975). Sèítání lidu, domů a bytů 1970 (Census of population and housing, 1970). Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
17. De Simoni, A. (1990). L'évolution récente de la fécondité italienne. Une analyse des tables de fécondité par rang de naissance, Cahiers québécois de démographie, 19, 123-36.
18. Denton, F. T. & Spencer, B. G. (1999). Population aging and its economic costs: A survey of the issues and evidence, Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population, Research Paper 1, March. Hamilton, Ontario: Department of Economics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. http://ideas.uqam.ca/ideas/data/Papers/mcmsedapp1.html
19. Dumont, G.-F. (2001). Les populations du monde. Paris: Armand Colin.
20. Ditgen, A. & Legoux, L. (1990). Vieillissement par le haut et par le bas: l'exemple de la France. In Population âgées et révolution grise, Chaire Quetelet 1986, Editions CIACO (pp. 89-103). Louvain, Belgium: Université Catholique de Louvain.
21. Ermisch, J. & Di Salvo, P. (1997). The economic determinants of young people's household formation, Economica, 64, 627-44.
22. Frejka, T. & Calot, G. (2001). Cohort reproductive patterns in low-fertility countries, Population and Development Review, 27, 103-132.
23. Garvey, D. L. & Espenshade, T.J. (1996). Fiscal impacts of New Jersey's immigrant and native households on state and local governments: a new approach and new estimates, OPR Working Paper, No. 96-5, September. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University, Office of Population Research.
24. Gauthier, A.H. & Hatzius, J. (1997). Family benefits and fertility: An econometric analysis, Population Studies, 51, 295-306.
25. Himes, C.L. (1992). Social demography of contemporary families and aging, Generations, 17, 13-16.
26. Kinsella, K. & Velkoff, V.A. (2001). An Aging World: 2001, U.S. Census Bureau, Series P95/ 01-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
27. Kuijsten, A. (1995). Recent trends in household and family structures in Europe: An overview. In Evert van Imhoff et al. (Eds.), Household Demography and Household Modeling (pp. 53-84). New York and London: Plenum Press.
28. Laws, G. (1994). Implications of demographic changes for urban policy and planning, Urban Geography, 15, 90-100.
29. Lefebvre, P., Brouillette, L. & Felteau, C. (1994). Comportements de fécondité des Québécoises, allocations familiales et impôts: résultats et simulations d'un modèle de choix discrets portant sur les années 1975-1987, Actualité Economique, 70, 399-451.
30. Levine, N. (1999). The effects of local growth controls on regional housing production and population redistribution in California, Urban Studies, 36, 2047-2068.
31. Liddle, B. (2000). Population growth, age structure, and environmental impact, Population and Environment, 21, 385-411.
32. London, R.A. (1998). Trends in single mothers' living arrangements from 1970 to 1995: Correcting the current population survey, Demography, 35, 125-131.
33. Lux, M. (2001). History and Challenges of "Social" Rental Housing in the Czech Republic. In M. Lux (Ed.), Social housing in Europe 2000 (pp. 33-48). Prague: Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
34. Lux, M. (2000). Housing policy changes and housing expenditures in the Czech Republic, Sociological Papers. Prague: Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
35. Martin, J. (1998). Politique familiale et travail des femmes mariées en France. Perspective historique: 1942-1982, Population, 53, 119-53.
36. Murray, M.S., 1998. Housing conditions of nuclear and extended households in the Miami Fort Lauderdale area, Population and Environment, 20, 55-76.
37. Myers, G. & Légaré, J. 2000. The behaviour and status of older persons. In Generations and gender programme: Exploring future research and data collection options (pp. 105-124). New York and Geneva: UN Commission for Europe and UN Population Fund, United Nations.
38. Okun, B.S. (1994). Evaluating methods for detecting fertility-control: Coale and Trussell's model and cohort parity analysis, Population Studies, 48, 193-222.
39. Paydarfar, A.A. (1995). Effects of multi-family housing on marital fertility in Iran: Population policy implications, Social Biology, 42, 214-225.
40. Prinz, Ch. (1995). Changing family structure and an emancipatory pension policy: The case of Austria. In J.-P. Gonnot, N. Keilman, and C. Prinz (Eds.), Social security, household, and family dynamics in ageing societies (pp. 149-179). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
41. Rallu, L. and Toulemon L. (1994). Period fertility measures: The construction of different indices and their application to France, 1946-89, Population (English Selection) 6, 59-130.
42. Rychtaříková, J. (2000). Demographic transition or demographic shock in recent population trends in the Czech Republic?, Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Geographica, 35, 89-102.
43. Rychtaříková, J. (1999). Is Eastern Europe experiencing a second demographic transition?, Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Geographica, 34, 19-44.
44. Rychtaříková, J. (1998). Analyse nationale et spatiale du comportement procréateur en République Tchèque (fécondité et avortement), 1987-1996. In Régimes démographiques et territoires: les frontières en question, Colloque international de La Rochelle, conference proeedings, Association internationale des démographes de langue française, 9, 22-26 September (pp. 183-202). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
45. Rychtaříkova, J. (1994). Czech and Slovak Families in the European Context, Journal of Family History, 19, 131-147.
46. Rychtaříková, J. and. Dzúrová, D. (1992). Les disparités géographiques de la mortalité en Tchécoslovaquie, Population, 47, 617-643.
47. Rychtaříková, J. and Kraus, J. (2001). Fertility and family surveys in countries of the ECE Region, Standard country report, the Czech Republic. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations Population Fund.
48. Sanderson, S.K. (2001). An evolutionary interpretation of fertility decline: New evidence. Population and Environment, 22, 555-563.
49. Spicer, K., Diamond, I., and Ni Bhrolchain, M. (1992). Into the twenty-first century with British households, International Journal of Forecasting (Special Issue), 8,529-39.
50. Statistics Canada (1987). Household status-relationship to household reference person. Reference Dictionary. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
51. Statistics Canada (1983). Historical statistics of Canada, Section B (Vital Statistics and Health), Catalogue 11-516-XIE (Occasional). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.ca/ english/freepub/11-516-XIE/sectiona/toc.htm
52. Státní úřad statistický (1965). Sèítání lidu, domů 1961 (Census of population and housing, 1961). Prague: State Statistical Office.
53. Stolnitz, G.J. (1992). Demographic aging and labour markets in the ECE region: Main variables and an agenda for research. In G.J. Stolnitz (Ed.), Demographic causes and economic consequences of population aging: Europe and North America, Economic Studies No. 3, UN Commission for Europe and UN Population Fund (pp. 371-379). New York: United Nations.
54. Tayman, J. (1996). The accuracy of small-area population forecasts based on a spatial interaction land use modeling system, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 85-98.
55. United Nations Development Programme (1999). Human development report, Czech Republic. Prague: Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs.
56. Van de Kaa, D. J. (1994). The second demographic transition revisited: Theories and expectations. In G.C.N. Beets et al. (Eds.), Population and family in the Low Countries: Late fertility and other current issues, Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute and Centrum voor Bevolkings- en Gezinsstudiën, Publication No. 30 (pp. 81-126). Swets and Zeitlinger: Berwyn, Pennsylvania and Amsterdam, Netherlands.
57. White, S. and Murdock, S. H. (1998). The importance of demographic analyses in state- and local-level policy evaluations: A case study analysis of property taxes in Texas, USA, Population Research and Policy Review, 17, 167-196.
58. Zhai, Z. (1997). Urbanization and the aging of urban population in China: Trend and counter-measures, Chinese Journal of Population Science, 9, 35-44.