Space syntax and spatial cognition: Or why the axial line?

Environment and Behavior

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 30-65

  Penn, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING; MOBILITY; NAVIGATION; PERCEPTION; SPATIAL COGNITION;

EID: 0037226739     PISSN: 00139165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013916502238864     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Burgess, N., Jeffery, K. J., & O'Keefe, J. (Eds.), (1999). The hippocampal and parietal foundations of spatial cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Chang, D. (1998). Integrated multi-level circulation systems in dense urban areas: The effects of complex spatial designs on multi level pedestrian movement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London.
3. Chang, D., & Penn, A. (1998). Integrated multilevel circulation in dense urban areas: The effect of multiple interacting constraints on the use of complex urban areas. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 507-538.
4. Choi, Y. K. (1991). The spatial structure of exploration and encounter in museum layouts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
5. Choi, Y. K. (1999). The morphology of exploration and encounter in museum layouts. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26, 241-250.
6. Conroy, R. A. (2001). Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London.
7. Conroy Dalton, R. (2001). The secret is to follow your nose. In Proceedings of the Third International Space Syntax Symposium (47.1-47.14). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
8. Haq, S. (1999). Can space syntax predict cognition? Proceedings of the Second International Space Syntax Symposium, II (40.1-40.14). Brasilia, Brazil: Universidad de Brasil.
9. Hartley, T., Burgess, N., Lever, C., Cacucci, F., & O'Keefe, J. (2000). Modeling place fields in terms of the cortical inputs to the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 10, 369-379.
10. Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis, J., & Penn, A. (1987). Creating life, or, does architecture determine anything? Architecture and Behavior/Architecture et Comportement, 3, 233-250.
11. Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Hillier, B., Hanson, J., Peponis, J., Hudson, J., & Burdett, R. (1983, November 30). Space syntax: A different urban perspective. The Architects Journal, 47-63.
13. Hillier, B., Penn, A., & Dalton, N. (1992, April 15). Milton Keynes: Looking back to London. The Architects Journal.
14. Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement; or, configuration and attraction in urban space use. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 29-66.
15. Kim, Y. O. (1999). Spatial configuration, spatial cognition and spatial behaviour: The role of architectural intelligibility in shaping experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London.
16. Kitchin, R., & Freundschuh, S. (2000). (Eds.). Cognitive mapping: Past, present and future. London: Routledge.
17. Mottram, C., & Penn, A. (1999). Slugfest. In the Proceedings of Generative Art '99. Milan, Italy: Politecnico di Milano.
18. Mottram, C., Penn, A., & Conroy, R. (1999). Virtual beings: Emergence of population level movement behaviours from individual rulesets. In the Proceedings of the Second International Space Syntax Symposium, 1 (1.10). Brasilia, Brazil: Universidad de Brasil.
19. Nerlich, G. (1994). The shape of space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21. Penn, A., & Dalton, N. (1994). The architecture of society: Stochastic simulation of urban movement. In N. Gilbert & J. Doran (Eds.), Simulating society: The computer simulation of social phenomena (pp. 85-126). London: UCL Press.
22. Penn, A., Hillier, B., Banister, D., & Xu, J. (1998a). Configurational modeling of urban movement networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 59-84.
23. Penn, A., Hillier, B., Banister, D., & Xu, J. (1998b). Configurational modeling of urban movement networks. In J. Ortuzar, D. Henshar, & S. Jara-Diaz (Eds.), Travel behavior research: Updating the state of play (pp. 339-362). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
24. Penn, A., & Turner, P. A. (2000). A system and method for intelligent modelling of public spaces. London: UK Patent Office Application G028477.
25. Penn, A., & Turner, A. (2000). Space syntax based agent simulation. In M. Schreckenberg & S. D. Sharma (Eds.), Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics (pp. 99-114). New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
26. Peponis, J., Hadjinikolaou, E., Livieratos, C., & Fatouros, D. A. (1989). The spatial core of urban culture. Ekistics, 334/335, 43-55.
27. Peponis, J., Zimring, C., & Choi, Y. K. (1990). Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment & Behavior, 22, 555-590.
28. Read, S. (1999). Space syntax and the Dutch city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26, 251-264.
29. Tecchia, F., Loscos, C., Conroy, R. A., & Chrysanthou, Y. L. (2001). Agent behavior simulator (ABS): A platform for behavior development in a city environment. In Proceedings of the First International Game Technology Conference and IDEA Expo (GTEC'01). Hong Kong: ACM Siggraph and Eurographics.
30. Turner, P. A., Doxa, M., O'Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001). From isovist fields to visibility graphs. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 103-121.
31. Turner, P. A., & Penn, A. (1999). Making isovists syntactic: Isovist integration analysis. In Proceedings of the Second International Space Syntax Symposium, I (1.08). Brasilia, Brazil: Universidad de Brasil.
32. Turner, P. A., & Penn, A. (2002). Encoding natural movement as an agent-based system: An investigation into human pedestrian behavior in the built environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 473-490.