Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: Implications for donor recruitment

Transfusion

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 7-16

  Glynn, Simone A ^a   Williams, Alan E ^b   Nass, Catharie C ^b   Bethel, James ^b   Kessler, Debra ^b   Scott, Edward P ^b   Fridey, Joy ^b   Kleinman, Steven H ^b   Schreiber, George B ^b  

^a WESTAT   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BLOOD DONOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; SCREENING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ATTITUDE; BLOOD DONORS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037224910     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00252.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Comprehensive report on blood collection and transfusion in the United States in 1999. Bethesda: The National Blood Data Resource Center, 2001.
2. Deferral of blood donors potentially exposed to the agent of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD). Presented at the Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies Advisory Committee (TSEAC) meeting, Bethesda, MD, June 28, 2001. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Dockets Management Branch. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/cber01.htm
3. Marius AD. Blood supply hits lowest level in years; surgeries canceled. The Wall Street Journal. June 26, 2002; D1.
4. Glynn SA, Kleinman SH, Schreiber GB, et al. Motivations to donate blood: demographic comparisons. Transfusion 2002;42:216-25.
5. Piliavin JA, Callero PL, eds. Giving blood: the development of an altruistic identity. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
6. Jason LA, Jackson K, Obradovic JL. Behavioral approaches in increasing blood donations. Eval Health Professions 1986;9:439-48.
7. Chrisman JC. Incentives for blood donation: do they work? MLO Med Labs Obs 1988;20:51-3.
8. Ferrari JR, Barone RC, Jason LA, Rose T. The use of incentives to increase blood donations. J Soc Psychol 1985; 125:791-3.
9. Murray C. Evaluation of on-site cholesterol testing as a donor recruitment tool. Transfusion 1988;28(Suppl):56S.
10. Rzasa M, Gilcher R. Cholesterol testing: incentive or health benefit? Transfusion 1988;28(Suppl):56S.
11. Kunin CM. Serum hepatitis from whole blood: incidence and relation to source of blood. Am J Med Sci 1959;237: 293-303.
12. Allen JG, Dawson D, Sayman WA, et al. Blood transfusion and serum hepatitis: use of monochloroacetate as an antibacterial agent in plasma. Ann Surg 1959;150:455-68.
13. Domen RE. Paid-versus-volunteer blood donation in the United States: a historical review. Transfus Med Rev 1995; 9:53-9.
14. Title 21, US Code of Federal Regulations, Section 606.121(c)(5).
15. USFDA. Office of Regulatory Affairs compliance references. Compliance policy guide, Compliance policy guidance for FDA staff and industry. Chapter 2, Subchapter 230, Sec 230.150. Blood donor classification statement, paid or volunteer donor, 2002. http://www.fda.gov/ora/compliance_ref/cpg/cpgbio/cpg230-150final.htm
16. Glynn SA, Smith JW, Schreiber GB, et al. Repeat whole-blood and plateletpheresis donors: unreported deferrable risks, reactive screening tests and response to incentive programs. Transfusion 2001;41:736-43.
17. Williams AE, Watanabe K, Ameti D, et al. Relationship of anti-HBc and serologic tests for syphilis (STS) to blood donor behavioral risks (abstract). Transfusion 1999;39(Suppl):114S.
18. Wallas CH. Donor incentives: a report of the AABB Board of Directors. Bethesda, MD: American Association of Blood Banks. Association Bulletin #94-6, October 1994:1-5.
19. Mohadjer L, Morganstein D, Chu A, Rhoads M. Estimation and analysis of survey data using SAS procedures WESVAR, NASSREG and NASSLOG. Proc Am Stat Assoc (Soc Statist Sect) 1986;258-63.
20. Fellegi IP. Approximate tests of independence and goodness of fit based on stratified multistage samples. J Am Stat Assoc 1980;71:665-70.
21. Rao JN, Scott AJ. The analysis of categorical data from complex sample surveys: chi-squared tests for goodness of fit and independence in two-way tables. J Am Stat Assoc 1981;76:221-30.
22. Rao JN, Scott AJ. On chi-squared tests for multiway contingency tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data. Ann Stat 1984;12:46-60.
23. Piliavin JA. Why do they give the gift of life ? A review of research on blood donors since 1977. Transfusion 1990; 30:444-59.
24. Aronson E. Cognitive evaluation theory: perceived causality and perceived competence. In: Deci EL, Ryan RM, eds. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press, 1985:43-51.
25. Sanchez AM, Ameti DI, Schreiber GB, et al. The potential impact of incentives on future blood donation behavior. Transfusion 2001;41:172-8.
26. Williams AE, Glynn SA, Bethel J, et al. Blood donation incentives: attitudes and risk relationships among first-time and repeat whole blood donors (abstract). Transfusion 2000;P5:1S.
27. Clinician's handbook of preventive services. 2nd ed. Public Health Service. McLean, VA: International Medical Publishing, 1997.
28. Williams AE, Thomson RA, Schreiber GB, et al. Estimates of infectious disease risk factors in US blood donors. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. JAMA 1997;277:967-72.
29. Stigum H, Bosnes V, Ørjasæter H, Heier HE, Magnus P. Risk behavior in Norwegian blood donors. Transfusion 2001;41:1480-5.