The grasshopper and the ants: Popular opinions of just distribution in Australia and Finland

Journal of Socio-Economics

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 721-743

  Kangas, Olli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037221592     PISSN: 10535357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-5357(02)00143-9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abbott, T., 2000. It's all about empowering job seekers. Sydney Morning Herald.
2. Arthur, J., Shaw, W., 1991. Justice and Economic Distribution. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ.
3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 1996. Australian Demographic Statistics.
4. Campbell, T., 1990. Justice. MacMillan, London.
5. Coleman, J., Fararo, T., 1992. Rational Choice Theory. Sage, London.
6. Elster, J., 1985. The Multiple Self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Ervasti, H., 1995. Kenen Vastuu? Whose Responsibility. Stakes, Helsinki.
8. Esping-Andersen, G., 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity Press, Cambridge.
9. Etzioni, A., 1988. The Moral Dimension: Towards a New Economics. Free Press, New York.
10. Forma, P., 1999. Interests, Institutions and the Welfare State. Studies on Public Opinion Towards the Welfare State. Stakes, Helsinki.
11. Forma, P., Kangas, O., 1999. Need, citizenship or merit: public opinion on pension policy in Australia, Finland and Poland. In: Stefan S., Taylor-Gooby, P. (Eds.), The End of the Welfare State: Responses to State Retrenchment. Routledge, London, pp. 161-189.
12. Goodin, R.E., 1988. Reasons for Welfare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Goodin, R.E., 1993. Motivating Political Morality. Blackwell, Oxford.
14. Graubard, S.M., 1986. Norden - the Passion for Equality. Norwegian University Press, Oslo.
15. Hasenfeld, Y., Rafferty, J.E., 1989. The determinants of public attitudes toward the welfare state. Social Forces 67, 1027-1048.
16. Kangas, O., 1995. Attitudes on means-tested social benefits in Finland. Acta Sociologica 38 (4), 299-310.
17. Kangas, O., 1997. Self-interest and the common good: the impact of norms, selfishness and context in social policy opinion, selfishness and context in social policy opinion. Journal of Socio-Economics 26 (5), 475-494.
18. Korpi, W., 1980. Social policy and distributional conflict in the capitalist democracies. West European Politics 3, 294-316.
19. Korpi, W., Palme, J., 1998. The Paradox of Redistribution, American Sociological Review.
20. LeGrand, J., 1991. Equity and Choice. An Essay in Economics and Applied Philosophy. Harper Collins, London. LIS, 1998. Income distribution measures as computed by K. Vleminckx (Luxembourg Income Study - LIS) (http://lissy.ceps.lu/ineq.htm).
21. Macintyre, A., 1996. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Duckworth, London.
22. Marini, M., 1992. The role of purposive action in sociology. In: Coleman, J., Fararo, T. (Eds.), Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique. Sage, London, pp. 21-48.
23. Marshall, G., 1997. Repositioning Class: Social Inequality in Industrial Societies. Sage, London.
24. Marshall, G., et al., 1999. Repositioning Class: Social Inequality in Industrial Societies. Sage, London.
25. Miller, D., 1976. Social Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
26. Murray, C., 1984. Losing Ground: American Social Policy 1950-1980. Basic Books, New York.
27. Murray, C., Herrnstein, R., 1994. Bell's Curve: Intelligence and Class Sructure in American Life. Free Press, New York.
28. Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Blackwell, Oxford.
29. OECD, 1995. Income Distribution in OECD Countries. Social Policy Studies No. 18.
30. Papadakis, E., Bean, C., 1993. Popular support for the welfare state: a comparison between institutional regimes. Journal of Public Policy 13, 227-254.
31. Rachels, J., 1991. What people deserve? In: Arthur, J., Shaw, W. (Eds.), Justice and Economic Distribution. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 136-148.
32. Rothstein, B., 1998. Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Sadurski, W., 1985. Giving Desert its Due: Social Justice and Legal Theory.
34. Saunders, P., 1999. The Perception of Equality. SPRC Newsletter No. 75, 1999, pp. 1-6.
35. Simon, H., 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 99-118.
36. Svallfors, S., 1997. Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: a comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review 13 (3), 283-304.
37. Svallfors, S., 1999. Mellan risk och tilltro: opinionstödet för en kollektiv välfärdspolitik. (Between Risk and Trust: Support to Collective Welfare Policy). Umeå Studies in Sociology No. 114. Department of Sociology, University of Umeå.
38. Taylor-Gooby, P., 1991. Social Change, Social Welfare and Social Science. Harvester, New York.
39. van Oorschot, W., 1997. Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the Dutch public. Working Papers 04/ Onderzoekschool Arbeid, Welzijn, Sociaal Economisch Bestuur, Tilburg.
40. Wacquant, L., 1999. How penal common sense comes to Europeans: notes on the transatlantic diffusion of the neoliberal doxa. European Societies 1 (3), 319-352.
41. Wilson, J.-W., 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
42. Wilson, J.-W. (Ed.), 1993. The Ghetto Underclass: Social Science Perspective. Sage, London.
43. Zagorski, K., Carne, S., 1995. Australian Public Opinion on Superannuation 1994. Working Paper Series 1. Institute of Applied Economics and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.