A new approach to site characterization using generalized regression neural networks

Geotechnical Special Publication

Volumn , Issue 121 SPEC., 2003, Pages 79-100

  Juang, C H ^a   Jiang, T ^a  

^a South   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; BACKPROPAGATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESTIMATION; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOILS;

CLASSIFICATION APPROXIMATION; FUNCTION APPROXIMATION; GENERALIZED REGRESSION NEURAL NETWORKS; GEOSTATICAL METHOD; RANDOM FIELD METHOD; SITE CHARACTERIZATION; SOFTWARE PACKAGE MATLAB;

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 0037220419     PISSN: 08950563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/9780784406694.ch06     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Adeli, H. (2001), Neural networks in civil engineering: 1989-2000. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 2.
2. Baecher, G.B. (1986), Geotechnical error analysis. Trans. Research Record, No. 1105, Washington, D.C., pp. 23-31
3. Briaud, J.L. (1997), The National Geotechnical Experimentation Sites at Texas A&M University: Clay and Sand, Report No. NGES-TAMU-007, September 1997, Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
4. Chiasson, P., Lafleur, J., Soulie, M., and Law, K.T. (1995), Characterizing spatial variability of a clay by geostatistics, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 1-10.
5. DeGroot, D.J. (1996), Analyzing spatial variability of in situ soil properties, Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: from Theory to Practice, Proceedings of Uncertainty '96, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 58, pp. 210-238.
6. Demuth, H. B. and Beale, M. (1999), Neural Network Toolbox, User's Guide, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA.
7. Fenton, G.A. (1998), Random field characterization of NGES data, paper presented at the Workshop on Probabilistic Site Characterization at NGES, Seattle, Washington, August 2, 1998.
8. Kulatilake, P.H.S.W. and Um, J. (1998), Spatial variation analysis using cone penetrometer data for the clay site at Texas A&M Riverside Campus, paper presented at the Workshop on Probabilistic Site Characterization at NGES, Seattle, Washington, August 2, 1998.
9. MathWork, Inc. (1999), Matlab User's Manual, Version 5.3, Natick, MA.
10. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., and Williams, R.J. (1986), Learning internal representations by error propagation, in Parallel Distributed Processing, Rumelhart and McClelland, eds., Vol. I, Chapt. 8, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 318-362.
11. Soulie, M., Montes, P., and Silvestri, V. (1990), Modeling spatial variability of soil parameters, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 27,pp. 617-630.
12. Specht, D.F. (1991), A general regression neural network, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 568-576.
13. Tabba, M.M. and Yong, R.N. (1981a), Mapping and predicting soil properties: theory, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. EM5, pp. 773-794.
14. Tabba, M.M. and Yong, R.N. (1981b), Mapping and predicting soil properties: applications, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. EM5, pp. 795-811.
15. VanMarcke, E.H. (1983). Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Wu, T.H. (1998), Variations in clay deposits of Chicago, paper presented at the Workshop on Probabilistic Site Characterization at NGEs, Seattle, Washington, August 2, 1998.