Phylogenetic relationships within the tageteae (asteraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal its and chloroplast ndhf gene sequences

Systematic Botany

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 191-207

  Loockerman, Dennis J ^a   Turner, Billie L ^b   Jansen, Robert K ^b  

^a MSC0461   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOPAPPUS; ASTERACEAE; BAJACALIA TRIDENTATA; DYSSODIA; EMBRYOPHYTA; PECTIS; POROPHYLLUM; SCHIZOTRICHIA; TAGETEAE; TAGETES; TRIDENTATA; VILOBIA;

EID: 0037220195     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. ALBERT, J., and E. M. FENYO. 1990. Simple, sensitive and specific detection of HIV-1 in clinical specimens by polymerase chain reaction with nested primers. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 28: 1560-1564.
2. BALDWIN, B. G., B. L. WESSA, and J. L. PANERO. 2002. Nuclear rDNA evidence for major lineages of Helenioid Heliantheae (Compositae). Systematic Botany 27: 161-198.
3. BAYER, R. J. and J. R. STARR. 1998. Tribal phylogeny of the Asteraceae based on two non-coding chloroplast sequences, the trnL intron and trnL/trnF intergenic spacer. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 242-256.
4. BENTHAM, G. 1840. Plantae Hartwegianae. London: Cramer.
5. _. 1873. Notes on the classification, history, and geographical distribution of Compositae. Journal of the Linnaen Society (Botany) 13: 335-577.
6. BREMER, K. 1987. Tribal interrelationships of the Asteraceae. Cladistics 3: 210-253.
7. _. 1994. Asteraceae Cladistics & Classification. Portland Oregon: Timber Press.
8. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, and P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 384-397.
9. CASSINI, H. 1829. Tableau synoptique des Synantherees. Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Paris 17: 387-423.
10. CHIPPINDALE P. T. and J. J. WIENS. 1994. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 43: 278-287.
11. CRONQUIST, A. 1955. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the Compositae. American Midland Naturalist 53: 478-511.
12. DE CANDOLLE, A. P. 1836. Compositae, Part I. In Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis, vol. 5. Paris: Treuttel and Wurtz.
13. DELIDOW, B. C., J. P. LYNCH, J. J. PELUSO, and B. A. WHITE. 1993. Polymerase chain reaction: basic protocols. Pp. 1-29 in PCR protocols: current methods and applications, ed. B. A. White. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
14. DOLPHIN, K. R. BELSHAW, C. D. ORME, and D. L. J. QUIKE. 2000. Noise and incongruence: Interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 401-406.
15. DONOGHUE, M. J. and M. J. SANDERSON. 1992. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Pp. 340-368 in Molecular Systematics of Plants, eds. P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle. London: Chapman and Hall.
16. DOWNIE, S. R. and D. S. KATZ-DOWNIE. 1996. A molecular phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. American Journal of Botany 83: 234-251.
17. DOWTON, M. and A. D. AUSTIN. 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy - The behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Systematic Biology 51: 19-31.
18. DOWNUM, K. R., D. J. KEIL, and E. RODRIGUEZ. 1985. Distribution of acetylenic thiophenes in the Pectidinae. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 13: 109-113.
19. DOYLE, J. J. and J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
20. FARRIS, J. S., M. KALLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE and C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
21. FARRIS, J. S., M. KALLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE and C. BULT. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Systematic Biology 44: 570-572.
22. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
23. HIGGINS, D. G., A. J. BLEASBY, and R. FUCHS. 1992. CLUSTAL V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 8: 189-191.
24. HILLIS, D. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 23-42.
25. HOFFMANN, O. 1890 Tubuliflorae-Heliantheae and Helenieae. Vol. 4, Pp. 210-267 inDie Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, eds. Engler and Prantl. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
26. HOOKER, W. D. and G. A. W. ARNOTT. 1838. The Botany of Captain Beechey's Voyage, vol. 7. London: Henry G. Bohn.
27. JANSEN, R. K. 1992. Current Research. Plant Molecular Evolution Newsletter 2: 13.
28. _, K. E. HOLSINGER, H. J. MICHAELS, and J. D. PALMER. 1990. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA restriction site data at higher taxonomic levels: an example from the Asteraceae. Evolution 44: 2089-2105.
29. _, H. J. MICHAELS, and, J. D. PALMER. 1991. Phylogeny and character evolution in the Asteraceae based on chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping. Systematic Botany 16: 98-115.
30. _, D. J. LOOCKERMAN, and H.-G. KIM. 1999. DNA sampling from herbarium material: a current perspective. Pp. 277-286 in D. Metsger, ed., Managing the Modern Herbarium: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Peanut Butter Press.
31. JOHNSON, R. R. 1969. Monograph of the plant genus Porophyllum (Compositae: Helenieae). The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 48: 225-267.
32. JOHNSTON, M. and B. L. TURNER. 1962. Chromosome numbers of Dyssodia (Compositae: Tagetinae) and phyletic interpretations. Rhodora 64: 2-15.
33. KARIS, P. O. 1993. Morphological phylogenetics of the Asteraceae-Asteroideae, with notes on character evolution. Plant Systematics and Evolution 186: 69-93.
34. KEIL, D. J. and J. MOREFIELD. 1989. Porophyllum pygmaeum (Asteraceae), a distinctive new species from southern Nevada. Systematic Botany 14: 583-588.
35. KIM, K.-J. and R. K. JANSEN. 1994. Comparisons of phylogenetic hypotheses among different data sets in dwarf dandelions (Krigia): additional information from internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution 190: 157-185.
36. KIM, K.-J. and R. K. JANSEN. 1995. ndhF sequence evolution and the major clades in the sunflower family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 92: 10379-10383.
37. LESSING, C. F. 1832. Synopsis Generum Compositarum. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.
38. LOOCKERMAN, D. J. and R. K. JANSEN. 1996. The use of herbarium material for molecular systematic studies. Pp 205-220 in Sampling the Green World, ed. T. Stuessy and S. H. Sohmer. New York: Columbia University Press.
39. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
40. MADDISON, W. P. and D. R. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade 4.0. Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
41. OLMSTEAD, R. G. and J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481.
42. RALSTON, B., G. NESOM, and B. L. TURNER. 1989. Documented plant chromosome numbers 1989:1. Chromosome numbers in Mexican Asteraceae with special reference to the Tribe Tageteae. Sida 13: 359-368.
43. ROBINSON, H. 1973. Additions to the genus Tagetes (Helenieae, Asteraceae). Phytologia 26: 378-380.
44. _. 1981. A revision of the tribal and subtribal limits of the Heliantheae (Asteraceae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Number 51.
45. RODRIGUEZ, E. and T. J. MABRY. 1977. Tageteae - chemical review. Pp. 785-798 in The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae, eds. V.H. Heywood et al. London: Academic Press.
46. SMITH, B. N. and B. L. TURNER. 1975. Distribution of Kranz syndrome among Asteraceae. American Journal of Botany 62: 541-545.
47. SOULE, J. A. 1993. The Biosystematics of Tagetes. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Texas. Austin.
48. _. 1996. Infrageneric systematics of Tagetes. Pp. 435-443 in Compositae: Systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994, eds. D. J. N. Hind, and H. J. Beentje. Royal Botanic Gardens: Kew.
49. STROTHER, J. L. 1967. Taxonomy of Gymnolaena (DC.) Rydb. (Compositae: Tageteae). Sida 3: 110-114.
50. _. 1968. Vilobia, a new genus (Compositae-Tageteae). Brittonia 20: 343-345.
51. _. 1969. Systematics of Dyssodia Cavanilles (Compositae: Tageteae). University of California Publications in Botany 48: Berkeley: University of California Press.
52. _. 1975. The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. The Linnean Society of London and the Phytochemical Society - Abstracts and Reports, pp. 1-14.
53. _. 1977a. Tageteae - Systematic Review. Pp. 769-783 in The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae, eds. V.H. Heywood et al. London: Academic Press.
54. _. 1977b. Taxonomy of Chrysactinia, Harnackia, and Lescaillea (Compositae: Tageteae). Madroño 24: 129-139.
55. _. 1978. Taxonomy and geography of Nicolletia (Compositae: Tageteae). Sida 7: 369-374.
56. _. 1986. Renovation of Dyssodia (Compositae: Tageteae). Sida 11: 371-378.
57. _. 1989. Chromosome numbers in Thymophylla (Compositae: Tageteae). Sida 13: 351-358.
58. _. 1995. Compositae-Heliantheae s.l., in Flora of Chiapas, part. 5. California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA.
59. STUESSY, T. F. 1977. Heliantheae, a Systematic Review. Pp. 621-671 in The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae, eds. V. H. Heywood et al, London: Academic Press.
60. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2001. PAUP*, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
61. TURNER, B. L. 1988. Hydropectis stevensii (Tageteae) positioned in a new monotypic genus Hydrodyssodia. Phytologia 65: 132-134.
62. _. 1995. Resubmergence of Hydrodyssodia B. L Turner into Hydropectis McVaugh (Asteraceae, Tageteae), with description of a new species, Hydropectis estradii, from Chihuahua, Mexico. Phytologia 78: 211-213.
63. _. 1996. The Comps of Mexico - A systematic account of the family Asteraceae, Vol. 6, Tageteae and Anthemideae. Phytologia Memoirs 10: 1-93.
64. _. and A. M. POWELL. 1977. Helenieae - Systematic Review. Pp. 699-737 in The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae, eds. V. H. Heywood et al. London: Academic Press.
65. URBATSCH, L. E., B. G. BALDWIN, and M. J. DONOGHUE. 2000. Phylogeny of the coneflowers and relatives (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) based on nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences and chloroplast DNA restriction site data. Systematic Botany 25: 539-565.
66. WHITE, T. J., T. BRUNS, S. LEE, and J. TAYLOR. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322 in PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Amplifications, M. Innis, D. Gelfand, J. Sninsky and T. White, eds. San Diego: Academic Press.
67. WIENS, J. J., and T. W. REEDER. 1995. Combining data sets with different numbers of taxa for phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 44: 548-558.
68. WIGGINS, I. L. 1980. Flora of Baja California. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA.
69. WINSHIP, P. 1989. An improved method for directly sequencing PCR amplified material using dimethyl sulphoxide. Nucleic Acids Research 17: 1266.
70. YODER, A. D., J. A. IRWIN, and B. A. PAYSEUR. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow Loris Phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50: 408-424.