Calculation of magnetic leakage field from a surface defect in a linear ferromagnetic material: An analytical approach

NDT and E International

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 51-55

  Lukyanets, S ^a   Snarskii, A ^b   Shamonin, M ^c   Bakaev, V ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF HYDROBIOLOGY   (Ukraine)

^b NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF UKRAINE   (Ukraine)

^c H Rosen Engineering GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Defects; Flux leakage; Magnetic methods; Mathematical model

Indexed keywords

DEFECTS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETIC LEAKAGE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

LEAKAGE FIELDS;

FERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS;

EID: 0037218833     PISSN: 09638695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00071-3     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Jansen H.J.M., Festen M.M. Intelligent pigging developments for metal loss and crack detection. Insight. 37:(6):1995;421-424.
2. Hwang K., Mandayam S., Udpa S.S., Udpa L., Lord W., Atzal M. Characterization of gas pipeline inspection signals using wavelet basis function neural networks. NDT E Int. 33:2000;531-545.
3. Ryu K.S., Atherton D.L., Clapham L. Effect of bulk stress and pit depth on calculated far and near-side magnetic flux leakage pit signals. Insight. 44:(5):2002;285-288. and references cited therein.
4. Minkov D., Lee J., Shoji T. Study of crack inversions utilizing dipole model of a crack and Hall element measurements. J Magn Magn Mater. 217:2000;207-215.
5. Zolotovitskii A.B., Lopatin V.V., Shleenkov A.S. Solution of reciprocal problem of magnetic flaw detection through calculation of multipole moments of an elliptic flaw. Russ J Nondestruct Test. 36:2000;800-814.
6. Förster F. On the way from the know-how to know-why in the magnetic leakage field method of nondestructive testing. Parts I and II. Mater Eval. 43:1995;1154. see also p. 1398.
7. Zatsepin N.N., Shcherbinin V.E. Calculation of the magnetostatic field of surface defects. I. Field topography of defect models. Sov J Nondestruct Test. 5:1966;385-393.
8. Shur M.L., Zagidulin R.V., Shcherbinin V.E. Theoretical problems of the field formation from a surface defect. Defektoskopiya. 3:1988;14-25. in Russian.
9. Zagidulin R.V. Calculation of the remnant magnetic field of a discontinuity defect in a ferromagnetic sample. II. Remnant magnetic field of a defect in the air. Defektoskopiya. 10:1998;33-39. in Russian.
10. Dobmann G., Höller P. Physical analysis methods of magnetic flux leakage. Sharpe R.S. Research techniques in NDT. 1980;39-69 Academic Press, London. Chapter 2.
11. Dobmann G. Magnetic leakage techniques in NDT. Lord W. Electromagnetic methods of NDT. Electromagnetic methods of NDT. 1985;71-95 Gordon & Breach, London.
12. Fedoryuk M.V. The method of the saddle point. 1977;Nauka, Moscow. In Russian.
13. Dingle R.B. Asymptotic expansions: their derivation and interpretation. 1973;Academic Press, London.
14. Olver F.W.J. Asymptotics and special functions. 1974;Academic Press, New York.
15. Tozoni O.V., Mayergoyz I.D. Calculation of three-dimensional magnetic fields. 1974;Tekhnika, Kiev. In Russian.
16. Tiknonov A.N., Samarsky A.N. Equations of mathematical physics. 1966;Nauka, Moscow. In Russian.
17. Carpenter D.C. Mater Eval. 2000;877.
18. Hammond P. Use of potentials in calculation of electromagnetic fields. IEE Proc. 129:(A):1982;106-112.
19. Militzer H., Weber F. Angewandte Geophysik, Band 1 Gravimetrie und Magnetik. 1984;Springer, Vienna. p. 245. In German.
20. Lauer G., Moreno P. New pigs combine previously separate detection technologies. Pipeline Gas Ind. 2001;29-37.