Did the property tax revolt affect local public education? Evidence from panel data

Public Finance Review

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 91-120

  Shadbegian, Ronald J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH   (United States)

^b US Environmental Protection Agency   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037216038     PISSN: 10911421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1091142102239136     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1977. State limitations on local taxes and expenditures. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2. _. 1995. Tax and expenditure limitations on local government. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
3. Bails, D. G. 1982. A critique on the effectiveness of tax-expenditure limitations. Public Choice 38:129-38.
4. _. 1990. The effectiveness of tax-expenditure limitations: A re-evaluation. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 49:223-38.
5. Bergstrom, T. C., and R. P. Goodman. 1973. Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review 63:280-96.
6. Borcherding, T. E. 1977. Budgets and bureaucrats: The sources of government growth. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7. Borcherding, T. E., and R. T. Deacon. 1972. The demand for the services of non-federal government. American Economic Review 62:891-901.
8. Bradbury, K. L., K. E. Case, and C. J. Mayer. 1998. School quality and Massachusetts enrollment shifts in the context of tax limitations. New England Economic Review, July/August, pp. 3-20.
9. Bradbury, Katharine L., Christopher J. Mayer, and Karl E. Case. 2001. Property tax limits, local fiscal behavior, and property values: Evidence from Massachusetts under Proposition 21/2. Journal of Public Economics 80:287-311.
10. Courant P., E. Gramlich, and D. Rubinfeld. 1980. Why voters support tax limitations: the Michigan case. National Tax Journal 33:1-20.
11. Downes, T. A. 1992. Evaluating the impact of school-finance reform on the provision of public education: The California case. National Tax Journal 45:405-19.
12. Downes, T. A., R. F. Dye, and T. J. McGuire. 1998. Do limits matter? Evidence on the effect of tax limits on student performance. Journal of Urban Economics 43:401-17.
13. Elder, H. W. 1992. Exploring the tax revolt: An analysis of the effectiveness of state tax and expenditure limitation laws. Public Finance Quarterly 20:47-63.
14. Figlio, D. N. 1997. Did the "tax revolt" reduce school performance? Journal of Public Economics 65:245-69.
15. _. 1998. Short-term effects of a 1990's-era tax limit: Panel evidence on Oregon's Measure 5. National Tax Journal 51:55-70.
16. Figlio, D. N., and K. S. Rueben. 2001. Tax limits and the qualifications of new teachers. Journal of Public Economics 80:49-71.
17. Gray, V. 1976. Models of comparative state politics: A comparison of cross-sectional and time series analysis. American Journal of Political Science 20:235-56.
18. Greene, W. H. 1997. Econometric analysis. 3d ed. New York: Macmillan.
19. Holtz-Eakin, D. 1988. The line item veto and public sector budgets: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics 36:269-92.
20. Howard, M. A. 1989. State tax and expenditure limitations: There is no story. Public Budgeting and Finance 9:83-90.
21. Hsiao, C. 1989. Analysis of panel data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Joyce, P. G., and D. R. Mullins. 1991. The changing fiscal structure of the state and local public sector: The impact of tax and expenditure limitations. Public Administration Review 51:240-53.
23. Kenyon, D. A., and K. M. Benker. 1984. Fiscal discipline: Lessons from the state experience. National Tax Journal 37:437-46.
24. Ladd, H. F., and J. B. Wilson. 1982. Why voters support tax limitations: Evidence from Massachusetts' Proposition 21/2. National Tax Journal 35:121-47.
25. Lowery, D. 1983. Limitations on taxing and spending powers: an assessment of their effectiveness. Social Science Quarterly 64:247-63.
26. Mullins, D. R., and P. G. Joyce. 1996. Tax and expenditure limitations and state and local fiscal structure: An empirical assessment. Public Budgeting and Finance, Spring, pp. 75-101.
27. Murray S. E., W. E. Evans, and R.M. Schwab. 1998. Education-finance reform and the distribution of education resources. American Economic Review 88:798-812.
28. Oates, W. E. 1985. Searching for leviathan: An empirical study. American Economic Review 75:748-57.
29. Poterba, J. M. 1995a. Balanced budget rules and fiscal policy: Evidence from the states. National Tax Journal 48:329-37.
30. _. 1995b. Capital budgets, borrowing rules, and state capital spending. Journal of Public Economics 56:165-87.
31. _. 1996. Budget institutions and fiscal policy in the U.S. states. American Economic Review 86:395-400.
32. _. 1997. Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 16:48-66.
33. Poterba, J. M., and K. S. Rueben. 1995. The effect of property-tax limits on wages and employment in the local public sector. American Economic Review 85:384-89.
34. Preston, A. E., and C. Ichniowski. 1991. A national perspective on the nature and effects of the local property tax revolt: 1976-1987. National Tax Journal 44:123-45.
35. Rueben, K. S. 1996. Tax limitations and government growth: The effect of state tax and expenditure limits on state and local government. Paper presented at the Western Economic Association meetings, July, in San Francisco.
36. Shadbegian, R. J. 1996. Do tax and expenditure limitations affect the size and growth of state government? Contemporary Economic Policy 14:22-35.
37. _. 1998. Do tax and expenditure limitations affect local government budgets? Evidence from panel data. Public Finance Review 26:218-36.
38. _. 1999. The effect of tax and expenditure limitations on the structure of local government, 1962-1987. National Tax Journal 52:221-37.
39. _. 2000. Did Proposition 21/2 affect local public education in Massachusetts? Evidence from panel data. Paper presented at the 1999 International Atlantic Economic Association Conference in Montreal, Canada.