Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy

Gut

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 116-121

  Ando, T ^a   Tsuyuguchi, T ^a   Okugawa, T ^a   Saito, M ^a   Ishihara, T ^a   Yamaguchi, T ^a   Saisho, H ^a  

^a CHIBA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACALCULOUS CHOLECYSTITIS; ADULT; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT STONE; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE COURSE; ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLOTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LITHOTRIPSY; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PNEUMOBILIA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RECURRENT DISEASE; RISK FACTOR;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BILE DUCT DISEASES; CHOLELITHIASIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GALLBLADDER; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; ODDS RATIO; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECURRENCE; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC;

EID: 0037215501     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gut.52.1.116     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Classen M, Demling L. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1974;99:469-7.
2. Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami K, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc 1974;20:148-51.
3. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: An attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383-93.
4. Draper NR, Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley, 1998.
5. Bergman JJ, van der Mey S, Rauws EA, et al. Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:643-9.
6. Wojtun S, Gil J, Gietka W, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A prospective single-center study on the short-term and long-term treatment results in 483 patients. Endoscopy 1997;29:258-65.
7. Pereira-Lima JC, Jakobs R, Winter UH, et al. Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:457-64.
8. Tanaka M, Takahata S, Konomi H, et al. Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:465-9.
9. Lai KH, Lin LF, Lo GH, et al. Does cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent the recurrence of biliary complications? Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:483-7.
10. Saito M, Tsuyuguchi T, Yamaguchi T, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis with cholecystolithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:540-5.
11. Danner A. Approaches to sample size estimation in the design of clinical trials - A review. Stat Med 1984;3:199-214.
12. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: John Wiley, 1980.
13. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Hahn EG, et al. 25 Years of endoscopic sphincterotomy in Erlangen: Assessment of the experience in 3498 patients. Endoscopy 1998;30:A194-201.
14. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-18.
15. Binmoeller KF, Schafer TW. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001;32:106-18.
16. Lai KH, Peng NG, Lo GH, et al. Prediction of recurrent choledocholithiasis by quantitative cholescintigraphy in patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gut 1997;41:399-403.
17. Madden JL. Common duct stones. Their origin and surgical management. Surg Clin North Am 1973;53:1095-113.
18. Benattar JM, Caroli Bosc FX, Harris AG, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients without stones in the gallbladder. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:2225-7.
19. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Longterm effects of endoscopic sphincterotomy on gall bladder motility. Gut 1996;39:856-9.
20. Agarwal DK, Sharma BC, Dhiman RK, et al. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy on gallbladder motility. Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:1495-500.
21. Dhiman RK, Phanish MK, Chawla YK, et al. Gallbladder motility and lithogenicity of bile in patients with choledocholithiasis after endoscopic sphincterotomy. J Hepatol 1997;26:1300-5.
22. Sharma BC, Agarwal DK, Baijal SS, et al. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy on gall bladder bile lithogenicity and motility. Gut 1998;42:288-92.
23. Maki T. Pathogenesis of calcium bilirubinate gallstone: Role of E. coli, beta-glucuronidase and coagulation by inorganic ions, polyelectrolytes and agitation. Ann Surg 1966;164:90-100.
24. Frossard JL, Hadengue A, Amouyal G, et al. Choledocholithiasis: A prospective study of spontaneous common bile duct stone migration. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:175-9.
25. Ueno N, Nishizono T, Tamada K, et al. Diagnosing extrahepatic bile duct stones using intraductal ultrasonography: A case series. Endoscopy 1997;29:356-60.
26. Ohashi A, Ueno N, Tamada K, et al. Assessment of residual bile duct stones with use of intraductal US during endoscopic balloon sphincteroplasty: Comparison with balloon cholangiography. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:328-33.
27. Tabata M, Nakayama F. Bacteria and gallstones. Etiological significance. Dig Dis Sci 1981;26:218-24.
28. Stewart L, Smith AL, Pellegrini CA, et al. Pigment gallstones form as a composite of bacterial microcolonies and pigment solids. Ann Surg 1987;206:242-50.
29. Kaufman HS, Magnuson TH, Lillemoe KD, et al. The role of bacteria in gallbladder and common duct stone formation. Ann Surg 1989;209:584-91.
30. Bergman JJ, van Berkel AM, Groen AK, et al. Biliary manometry, bacterial characteristics, bile composition, and histologic changes fifteen to seventeen years after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:400-5.