Genetic algorithm-based relevance feedback for image retrieval using local similarity patterns

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-23

  Stejić, Zoran ^a   Takama, Yasufumi ^a,b   Hirota, Kaoru ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithm; Image retrieval; Image similarity; Relevance feedback

Indexed keywords

COLOR IMAGE PROCESSING; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; TEXTURES;

LOCAL SIMILARITY PATTERN (LSP);

CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL;

EID: 0037213417     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(02)00024-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brandt S., Laaksonen J., Oja E. Statistical shape features in content-based image retrieval. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR-2000, Barcelona, Spain. Vol. 2:2000;1066-1069.
2. Brodatz P. Textures: A photographic album for artists and designers. 1966;Dover Publications, New York.
3. Chan D.Y.M., King I. Weight assignment in dissimilarity function for Chinese cursive script character image retrieval using genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Information Retrieval with Asian Languages, IRAL'99, Taipei, Taiwan. 1999a;55-62.
4. Chan D.Y.M., King I. Genetic algorithm for weights assignment in dissimilarity function for trademark retrieval. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Visual Information Systems, VISUAL'99, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 1614:1999b;557-565 Springer Verlag, Berlin.
5. Corel Corporation. (2000). Corel Gallery 3.0. Available: http://www3.corel.com/.
6. Del Bimbo A. Visual information retrieval. 1999;Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc, San Francisco.
7. Garcia J.A., Fdez-Valdivia J., Fdez-Vidal X.R., Rodriguez-Sanchez R. Information theoretic measure for visual target distinctness. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 23(4):2001;362-383.
8. Goldberg D.E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. 1989;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
9. Laaksonen J., Oja E., Koskela M., Brandt S. Analyzing low-level visual features using content-based image retrieval. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP'00), Taejon, Korea. 2000;1333-1338.
10. Lew M.S. Principles of visual information retrieval. 2001;Springer Verlag, London.
11. Li J., Wang J.Z., Wiederhold G. IRM: Integrated region matching for image retrieval. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Multimedia Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2000;147-156.
12. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Media Lab. (2001). Vision Texture Database. Available: ftp://whitechapel.media.mit.edu/pub/VisTex/.
13. Rui, Y., & Huang, T.S. (2001). Relevance feedback techniques in image retrieval. In Lew (Ed.) (pp. 219-258) 2001 [Chap. 9].
14. Rui Y., Huang T.S., Ortega M., Mehrotra S. Relevance feedback: a power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. 8(5):1998;644-655.
15. Santini S., Jain R. Similarity is a geometer. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 5(3):1997;277-306.
16. Santini S., Gupta A., Jain R. Emergent semantics through interaction in image databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 13(3):2001;337-351.
17. Smeulders A.W.M., Worring M., Santini S., Gupta A., Jain R. Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 22(12):2000;1349-1380.
18. Stejić Z., Iyoda E.M., Takama Y., Hirota K. Automatic textual summarization of image database contents using combination of clustering and neural network techniques. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Technologies, Intech 2001, Bangkok, Thailand. 2001;233-239.
19. Stricker M., Orengo M. Similarity of color images. Proceedings of IS&T and SPIE Storage and Retrieval of Image and Video Databases III, San Jose, CA, USA. 1995;381-392.
20. University of Southern California, Signal and Image Processing Institute. (2001). The USC-SIPI Image Database. Available: http://sipi.usc.edu/services/database/Database.html.
21. Vailaya A., Jain A.K. Shape-based retrieval: a case study with trademark image databases. Pattern Recognition. 31(9):1998;1369-1390.
22. Vailaya A., Jain A.K., Zhang H.J. On image classification: city images vs. landscapes. Pattern Recognition. 31(12):1998;1921-1935.
23. Wandell B.A. Foundations of vision. 1995;Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
24. Wang J.Z., Li J., Wiederhold G. SIMPLIcity: Semantics-sensitive Integrated Matching for Picture LIbraries. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 23(9):2001;947-963.
25. Zhou, X.S., & Huang, T.S. (2001). Exploring the nature and variants of relevance feedback. In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries, in conjunction with IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'01), Hawaii, USA.