Matched pair analysis of shock wave lithotripsy effectiveness for comparison of lithotriptors

Journal of Urology

Volumn 169, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 58-62

  Portis, Andrew J ^a   Yan, Yan ^a   Pattaras, John G ^a   Andreoni, Cassio ^a   Moore, Robert ^a   Clayman, Ralph V ^a,b,c  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b College of Medicine ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation studies; Lithotripsy; Technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LITHOTRIPSY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER STONE; UROLITHIASIS;

EID: 0037213146     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64034-7     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Chaussy, C., Brendel, W. and Schmiedt, E.: Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet, 2: 1265, 1980
2. Drach, G. W., Dretler, S., Fair, W., Finlayson, B., Gillenwater, J., Griffith, D. et al: Report of the United States Cooperative Study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 135: 1127, 1986
3. Fleiss, J. L.: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, p. 114, 1981
4. Breslow, N. E. and Day, N. E.: Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies. IARC Sci Publ, 32: 5, 1980
5. Cass, A. S.: Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: Treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol, 153: 588, 1995
6. Fuselier, H. A., Prats, L., Fontenot, C. and Gauthier, A., Jr.: Comparison of mobile lithotripters at one institution: Healthtronics lithotron, Dornier MFL-5000, and Dornier Doli. J Endourol, 13: 539, 1999
7. El-Damanhoury, H., Schärfe, T., Rüth, J., Roos, S. and Hohenfellner, R.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of urinary calculi: Experience in treatment of 3,278 patients using the Siemens Lithostar and Lithostar Plus. J Urol, 145: 484, 1991
8. Mobley, T. B., Myers, D. A., Grine, W. B., Jenkins, J. McK. and Jordan, W. R.: Low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar: Treatment results with 19,962 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol, 149: 1419, 1993
9. Liston, T. G., Montgomery, B. S., Bultitude, M. I. and Tiptaft, R. C.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with the Storz Modulith SL20: The first 500 patients. Br J Urol, 69: 465, 1992
10. Köhrmann, K. U., Rassweiler, J. J., Manning, M., Mohr, G., Henkel, T. O., Jünemann, K. P. et al: The clinical introduction of a third generation lithotriptor: Modulith SL 20. J Urol, 153: 1379, 1995
11. Coz, F., Orvieto, M., Bustos, M., Lyng, R., Stein, C., Hinrichs, A. et al: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of 2000 urinary calculi with the modulith SL-20: Success and failure according to size and location of stones. J Endourol, 14: 239, 2000
12. Peschel, R., Janetschek, G. and Bartsch, G.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: A prospective randomized study. J Urol, 162: 1909, 1999
13. Pearle, M. S., Blackstone, S., Dunn, M. D., Figenshau, R. S., Sundaram, C. P., McDougall, E. M. et al: Prospective randomized trial comparing ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi. J Endourol, 13: A42, 1999