Acceptance of computerized compared to paper-and-pencil assessment in psychiatric inpatients

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 81-93

  Weber, Bernhard ^a   Schneider, Barbara ^a   Fritze, Jürgen ^a   Gille, Boris ^a   Hornung, Stefan ^a   Kühner, Thorsten ^a   Maurer, Konrad ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Computer attitude; Computer diagnostics; Psychiatry; Self assessment

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

COMPUTER ATTITUDE;

PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

EID: 0037212923     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00012-2     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM IV. 1994;American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.
2. Beringer J. Experimental Run Time System (ERTS). 1993;BeriSoft Cooperation, Frankfurt/Main.
3. Bouman T.K., Wolters F.J.M., Wolters-Hoff G.H. Een schaal om attitudes tegenover computers te meten. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie. 44:1989;288-292.
4. Brickenkamp R. Test d2 - Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test. 1994;Hogrefe, Göttingen.
5. Canfield M.L. Computerized rating of the psychotherapeutic process. Psychotherapy. 28:1991;304-316.
6. Carr A.C., Ancill R.J., Ghosh A., Margo A. Direct assessment of depression by microcomputer. A feasibility study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 64(5):1981;415-422.
7. Carroll J.M. Human-computer interaction, the past and the present. Carroll J.M. Human-computer interaction in the new millennium. 2001;xxvii-xxxvii ACM Press and Addison-Wesley, New York, Boston, San Francico.
8. Dietmaier O., Laux G. Uebersichtstabellen. Riederer P., Laux G., Pöldinger W. Neuro-Psychopharmaka Wien. 1992;Springer, New York.
9. Fahrenberg J. Ambulant assessment: computer assisted data acquisition under natural conditions. Diagnostica. 40(3):1994;195-216.
10. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatry Research. 12(3):1975;189-198.
11. French C.C., Beaumont J.G. The reaction of psychiatric patients to computerized assessment. British Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 26(4):1987;267-278.
12. Freudenmann R.W., Spitzer M. Computer-assisted patient survey as the basis for modern quality assurance in psychiatry. Results of pilot studies. Nervenarzt. 72(1):2001;40-51.
13. Gitzinger I. Acceptance of tests presented on a personal computer by inpatients. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 40(3-4):1990;143-145.
14. Hedlund J.L., Vieweg B.W., Cho D.W. Mental health computing in the 1980s. II. Clinical applications. Comput Hum Serv. 1:1985;1-31.
15. Hudiburg R.A. Relationship of computer hassles, somatic complaints, and daily hassles. Psychological Reports. 69(3):1991;1119-1122.
16. Hudiburg R.A., Ahrens P.K., Jones T.M. Psychology of computer use. 31. Relating computer users stress, daily hassles, somatic complaints, and anxiety. Psychological Reports. 75(3):1994;1183-1186.
17. Ihl R., Weyer G. Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) - German Version. 1994;Beltz, Göttingen.
18. Jäger R.S., Krieger W. Future prospects of computer-based assessment, exemplified on the basis of treatment-oriented assessment. Diagnostica. 40(3):1994;217-243.
19. Lienert G.A., Raatz U. Testaufbau und Testanalyse. 1994;Psychologie Verlags Union, Weinheim.
20. Lucas R.W., Mullin P.J., Luna C.B., McInroy D.C. Psychiatrists and a computer as interrogators of patients with alcohol-related illnesses: a comparison. British Journal of Psychiatry. 131:1977;160-167.
21. Maxwell K. The maturation of HCI: moving beyond usability towards holistic interaction. Carroll J.M. Human-computer interaction in the new millennium. 2001;191-233 ACM Press and Addison-Wesley, New York, Boston, San Francico.
22. McGuire M., Bakst K., Fairbanks L., McGuire M., Sachinvala N., von Scotti H., Brown N. Cognitive, mood, and functional evaluations using touchscreen technology. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 188(12):2000;813-817.
23. Neal L.A., Busuttil W., Herapath R., Strike P.W. Development and validation of the computerized clinician administered post-traumatic stress disorder scale-1-revised. Psychological Medicine. 24:1994;701-706.
24. Pelissolo A., Veysseyre O., Lepine J.P. Validation of a computerized version of the temperament and character inventory (TCI) in psychiatric inpatients. Psychiatry Research. 72(3):1997;195-199.
25. Rosen L.D., Maguire P.D. Myths and realities of computerphobia: a meta-analysis. Anxiety Research. 3:1990;175-191.
26. Rosen L.D., Sears D.C., Weil M.M. Computerphobia. Behavior Research Methods Instrumentation and Computers. 19:1987;167-179.
27. Rosen L.D., Weil M.M. Computer anxiety: a cross-cultural comparison of university students in 10 countries. Computers in Human Behavior. 11(1):1995;45-64.
28. Schriger D.L., Gibbons P.S., Langone C.A., Lee S., Altshuler L.L. Enabling the diagnosis of occult psychiatric illness in the emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial of the computerized, self-administered PRIME-MD diagnostic system. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 37(2):2001;132-140.
29. Shakeshaft A.P., Bowman J.A., Sanson-Fisher R.W. Computers in community-based drug and alcohol clinical settings: are they acceptable to respondents? Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 50(2):1998;177-180.
30. Skinner H.A., Pakula A. Challenge of computers in psychological assessment. Professional Psychology. 17:1986;44-50.
31. Spinhoven P., Labbe M.R., Rombouts R. Feasibility of computerized psychological testing with psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 49:1993;440-447.
32. Stevenson J.F., Beattie M.C., Alves R.R., Longabaugh R., Ayers T. An outcome monitoring system for psychiatric inpatient care. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 14(11):1988;326-331.
33. Sutcliffe A. On the effective use and reuse of HCI knowledge. Carroll J.M. Human-computer interaction in the New Millennium. 2001;3-29 ACM Press and Addison-Wesley, New York, Boston, San Francico.
34. Tseng H.M., Tiplady B., Macleod H.A., Wright P. Computer anxiety: a comparison of pen-based personal digital assistants, conventional computer and paper assessment of mood and performance. British Journal of Psychology. 89(4):1998;599-610.
35. Turner C.F., Ku L., Rogers S.M., Lindberg L.D., Pleck J.H., Sonenstein F.L. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science. 280:1998;867-873.
36. Weber B., Fritze J., Schneider B., Simminger D., Maurer K. Computerized self-assessment in psychiatric in-patients: acceptability, feasibility and influence of computer attitude. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 98(2):1998;140-145.
37. Weber, B., Fritze, J., Schneider, B., Kühner, T., Maurer, K. (2002). Bias in computerized neuropsychological assessment of depressive disorders caused by computer attitude. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 105(2) 126-30.
38. Weil M.M., Rosen L.D., Shaw S. Computerphobia reduction program: clinical resource manual. 1988;California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA.
39. Weil M.M., Rosen L.D., Wugalter S. The etiology of computerphobia. Computers in Human Behavior. 6:1990;361-379.