Identifying splicing sites in eukaryotic RNA: Support vector machine approach

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 17-29

  Sun, Ying Fei ^a   Fan, Xiao Dan ^a   Li, Yan Da ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Neural network; RNA secondary structure; Sensitivity; Specificity; Splice site; Support vector machines (SVM)

Indexed keywords

PATTERN RECOGNITION; RNA; STATISTICAL METHODS;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES (SVM);

MEDICINE;

RNA;

ARTICLE; EUKARYOTE; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; RNA ANALYSIS; RNA SPLICING; RNA STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGY; EUKARYOTIC CELL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); RNA SPLICING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA;

EID: 0037212915     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4825(02)00057-4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ogura H., Agala H.et al. A study of learning splice sites of DNA sequence by neural networks. Comput. Biol. Med. 27:1997;67-75.
2. Hua S., Sun Z. A novel method of protein secondary structure prediction with high segment overlap measure. support vector machine approach J. Mol. Biol. 308(2):2001;397-407.
3. M. Brown, W. Grundy, D. Lin, et al., Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data using support vector machines, Technical Report, University of California in Santa Cruz, 1999.
4. Vapnik V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. 1995;Springer, New York.
5. Vapnik V. Statistical Learning Theory. 1998;Wiley, New York.
6. Cristianini N., Shawe-Taylor J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machine and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods. 2000;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support vector networks. Mach. Learning. 20:1995;273-293.
8. Drucker H., Wu D., Vapnik V. Support vector machines for spam categorization. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks. 10:1999;1054-1084.
9. Roobaert D., Hulle M.M. View-based 3D object recognition with Support Vector Machines. Hu Y.H., Larsen J., Wilson E., Douglas S. Proceedings of the IEEE Neural Networks for Signal Proceeding Workshop. 1999;77-84 IEEE Press, New Jersey.
10. M. Schmidt, H. Grish, Speaker identification via support vector classifiers, in: The Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Proceeding 1996, IEEE Press, Long Beach, CA, 1996, pp. 105-108.
11. Thanaraj T.A., Clark F. Human GC-AG alternative intron isoforms with weak donor sites show enhanced consensus at acceptor exon positions. Nucl. Acids Res. 29:2001;2581-2593.
12. Thanaraj T.A. A clean data set of EST-confirmed splice sites fome Homo sapiens and standards for clean-up procedures. Nucl. Acids Res. 27:1999;2627-2637.
13. Burset M., Seledtsov I.A., Solovyev V.V. SpliceDB. database of canonical and non-canonical mammalian splice sites Nucl. Acids Res. 29:2001;255-259.
14. Zuker M. On finding all suboptimal foldings of an RNA molecule. Science. 244:1989;48-52.
15. Zuker M. The use of dynamic programming algorithms in RNA secondary structure prediction. Waterman M.S. Mathematical Methods for DNA Sequences. 1989;159-184 CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
16. Zuker M., Stiegler P. Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information. Nucl. Acids Res. 9:1981;133-148.
17. McCaskill J.S. The equilibrium partition function and base pair binding probabilities for RNA secondary structure. Biopolymers. 29:1990;1105-1119.
18. Hofacker I.L., Fontana W., Stadler P.F.et al. Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structure. Monatsh. Chem. 125:1994;167-188.
19. Ding Y., Lawrence C.E. A Bayesian statistical algorithm for RNA secondary structure prediction. Comput. Chem. 23:1999;387-400.
20. Ding Y., Lawrence C.E. Statistical prediction of single-stranded regions in RNA secondary structure and application to predicting effective antisense target sites and beyond. Nucl. Acids Res. 29:2001;1034-1046.
21. Burset M., Guigo R. Genomics. 34:1996;353-367.
22. Zhang C.-T., Wang J. Recognition of protein coding genes in the yeast genome at better than 95% accuracy based on Z curve. Nucl. Acids Res. 28:2000;2804-2814.
23. Konagaya A. A stochastic approach to genetic information processing. J. Jpn. Soc. Artif. Intell. 8:1993;427-438.
24. Xu Y., Mural R.J., Uberbacher E.C. Constructing gene models from accurately predicted exons. an application of dynamic programming CABIOS. 10:1994;613-623.
25. Xu Y., Mural R.J., Uberbacher E.C. Correcting sequencing errors in DNA coding regions using a dynamic programming approach. CABIOS. 11:1995;117-124