Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic - Part III: Towards a common methodology for socio-vibrational surveys

Applied Acoustics

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 111-120

  Klaeboe R ^a   Ohrstrom E ^b   Turunen Rise, I H ^c   Bendtsen, H ^d   Nykanen H ^e  

^a INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c Norwegian Council for Building Standardization   (Norway)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^e VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Annoyance questions; Nordic Method; Survey standard; Traffic induced vibration

Indexed keywords

NOISE POLLUTION; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; ROADS AND STREETS; STATISTICAL METHODS; TRAFFIC SURVEYS; URBAN PLANNING; VIBRATION MEASUREMENT;

TRAFFIC-INDUCED VIBRATIONS;

VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

EID: 0037209674     PISSN: 0003682X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-682X(02)00054-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Klæboe R. Methodology for assessing community reactions to vibrations in dwellings. Progress report. Working paper SM1010/1999. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics, 1999.
2. Klæboe R. Fyhri A. People's reactions to vibrations in dwellings from road and rail. TØI report 443/1999. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics, 1999.
3. Öhrström E. Skånberg A. Reactions to noise and vibrations from railway traffic, results from a socio-acoustic survey in 15 Swedish areas. Report 1/95. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Environmental Medicine, 1995.
4. Öhrström E., Skånberg A.B. A field survey on effects of exposure to noise and vibration from railway traffic 1. Annoyance and activity disturbance effects. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 193(1):1996;39-47.
5. Öhrström E. Community reactions to railway traffic effects of countermeasures against noise and vibration. Proceedings of the 1997 international congress on noise control engineering Budapest. Opakfi, 1997, 2 1065-70.
6. Öhrström E. Effects of exposure to railway noise - a comparison between areas with and without vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 205 (4):1997;555-560.
7. Klæboe R., Öhrström E. Assessment of annoyance caused by vibrations in dwellings from road and rail traffic - proposal for a Nordtest Method. TØI report 458/99. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics, 1999.
8. Hårvik L. Norwegian Standard for vibrations from road and rail traffic NS 8176. Calculated vibration values for the Norwegian and simple exposure effect relationships for the Swedish socio-vibrational study. Report 515159-1. Oslo: Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, 1998.
9. Kolbenstvedt M., Klæboe R., Kjørstad K.N. Aircraft traffic, neighbourhood quality and health results from a community survey around Oslo Airport Fornebu in 1989. TØI report 65/1 990. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics, 1990.
10. Klæboe R., Kolbenstvedt M., Clench-Aas J., Bartonova A. Oslo traffic study - part 1: an integrated approach to assess the combined effects of noise and air pollution on annoyance. Atmospheric Environment. 34(27):2000;4727-4736.
11. Öhrström E. Effects of railway noise abatements efforts - survey of the effects of a noise screen in Lund, Sweden. Report 7. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Environmental Medicine, 1996.
12. Fields J.M. Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 93(5):1993;2753-2763.
13. Fields J.M., De Jong R.G., Gjestland T., Flindell I.H., Job R.F.S., Kurra S., Lercher P., Vallet M., Yano T., Guski R., Felscher-Suhr U., Schumer R. Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: Research and a recommendation. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2001;242(4):641-79.
14. Guski, R., Felscher-Suhr U., Schuemer, R. The concept of noise annoyance: How international experts see it. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1999;223(4):513-27.
15. ISO/TC43/WG49. Acoustics - Assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys. Draft Technical Specification ISO/DTS 15666. Charlottenlund, Denmark: ISO, 2001.
16. Sælensminde K. Valuation of nonmarket goods for use in cost-benefit analyses: Methodological issues. TØI report 491/2000. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics, 2000.
17. Klæboe R., Turunen-Rise I.H., Hårvik L., Madshus C. Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic - Part II: exposure-Effect relationships based on ordinal logit and logistic regression models. Applied Acoustics 2003;64(1):89-110.
18. Fields J.M., de Jong R.G., Brown A.L., Flindell I.H., Gjestland T., Job R.F.S., Kurra S., Lercher P., Schuemer R., Kohrs A., Vallet M., Yano T. Guidelines for reporting core information from community noise reaction surveys. Jounal of Sound and Vibration. 206(5):1997;685-695.
19. Norwegian Standard NS 8176. Vibration and shock. Measurement of vibration in buildings from land-based transport and evaluation of effects on human beings. Oslo: Norwegian Council for Building Standardization, 1999.
20. Turunen-Rise I.H., Brekke A., Hårvik L., Madshus C., Klæboe R. Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic - Part I: a new Norwegian measurement standard and classification sys-tem. Applied Acoustics 2003;64(1):71-87.
21. Winneke G., Neuf M., Steinheider B. Separating the impact of exposure and personality in annoyance response to environmental stressors, particularly odors. Environment International. 22 (1):1996;73-81.