Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence: Outcome of prospective experience with 37 patients in one institution

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 237, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 52-56

  Michot, Francis ^a   Costaglioli, Bruno ^b   Leroi, Anne Marie ^b   Denis, Philippe ^b  

^a HÔPITAL CHARLES NICOLLE   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANORECTAL MALFORMATION; ANORECTAL PRESSURE; ANUS SPHINCTER; ANUS SPHINCTER DISORDER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTINENCE; DEVICE; DEVICE REMOVAL; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; MANOMETRY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM PROLAPSE; REIMPLANTATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ANAL CANAL; CHRONIC DISEASE; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; FRANCE; HOSPITALIZATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ANAL CANAL; CHRONIC DISEASE; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRANCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037208552     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Gold DM, et al. Clinical, physiological and radiological study of the new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter. Lancet 1998; 352:105-109.
2. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:77-97.
3. Denis P, Bercoff E, Bizien MF, et al. Etude de la prevalence de l'incontinence anale chez l'adulte. Gastroentérol Clin Biol 1992; 16: 344-350.
4. Karoui S, Leroi AM, Koning E, et al. Results of sphincteroplasty in 86 patients with anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:813-820.
5. Le Blanc I, Michot F, Ducrotte P, et al. In case of reeducation failure, should postanal repair be the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dig Surg 1993; 10:39-42.
6. Setti-Carraro P, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ. Long-term results of postanal repair for neurogenic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 140-144.
7. Leroi AM, Michot F, Grise P, et al. Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:779-789.
8. Lehur PA, Michot F, Denis P, et al. Results of artificial anal sphincter in severe anal incontinence. Report of 14 consecutive implantations. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:1352-1355.
9. Christiansen J, Rasmussen O, Lindorff-Larsen K. Long-term results of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe anal incontinence. Ann Surg 1999; 230:45-48.
10. Hajivassiliou CA, Finlay IG. Effect of a novel prosthetic anal neosphincter on human colonic blood flow. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1703-1707.
11. Riedel JG, Festge OA. Eine neue behandlungmethode bei schwerer stuhlidkontinenz im kindesalter. Chirurg 1999; 70:935-938.
12. Savoye G, Leroi AM, Denis P, et al. Manometric assessment of an artificial bowel sphincter. Br J Surg 2000; 87:586-589.
13. Baeten CGMI and the Dynamic Graciloplasty Group. Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:743-751