Drip loss sampling in porcine m. longissimus dorsi

Meat Science

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 469-477

  Christensen, Lars Bager ^a  

^a DANISH MEAT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Drip loss; Meat quality; Sampling; Ultimate pH

Indexed keywords

DRIP LOSS;

CORRELATION METHODS; MEATS; OILS AND FATS; PH EFFECTS; SAMPLING;

MUSCLE;

SUIDAE;

EID: 0037208064     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00106-7     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Barton-Gade, P. A., Demeyer, D., Honikel, K. O., Joseph, R. L., Poulanne, E., Severini, M., Smulders, J. F. M., & Tornberg, E. (1993). Reference methods for water holding capacity in meat and meat products: procedures recommended by an OECD working group and presented at the 39th ICOMST in 1993. In Proc. 39th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, file S4 PO2. WP, Calgary.
2. Forrest, J. C., Morgan, M. T., Borggaard, C., Rasmussen, A. J., Jespersen, B. L., & Andersen, J. R. (2000). Development of technology for the early post mortem prediction of water holding capacity and drip loss in fresh pork. Meat Science, 55, 115-122.
3. Honikel, K. O. (1987). The water binding of meat. Fleischwirtschaft, 67(9), 1098-1102.
4. Lundstrøm, K., & Malmfors, G. (1985). Variation in light scattering and water-holding capacity along the porcine longissimus dorsi Muscle. Meat Science, 15, 203-214.
5. Rasmussen, A.J., & Andersson, M. (1996): New method for determination of drip loss in pork muscles. In Hildrum & Risvik (Eds.) Proc. 42nd International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Lillehammer, Norway (pp. 286-287).
6. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT. (1987). Guide for personal computers, Version 6 ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
7. Van Moeseke, W., & De Smet, S. (1999). Effect of time of deboning and sample size on drip loss of pork. Meat Science, 52, 151-156.
8. Van Deckel, M. J., Warnants, N., & Boucqué, Ch. V. (1999). Comparison of different methods for measuring water holding capacity and juiciness of pork versus on-line screening methods. Meat Science, 51, 313-329.