Negative emissions from BioEnergy use, carbon capture and sequestration (BECS) - The case of biomass production by sustainable forest management from semi-natural temperate forests

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 24, Issue 4-5, 2003, Pages 285-296

  Kraxner, Florian ^a   Nilsson, Sten ^a   Obersteiner, Michael ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Bioenergy; Permanence; Saturation; Scrubbing; Semi natural forests; Sequestration; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; GREENHOUSE EFFECT;

BIOENERGY;

BIOMASS;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY; TEMPERATE FOREST;

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTS; GREENHOUSE GASES;

EID: 0037208040     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00172-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Schimel DS, House JI, Hibbard KA, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Peylin P, Braswell BH, Apps MJ, Baker D, Bondeau A, Canadell J, Churkina G, Cramer W, Denning AS, Field CB, Friedlingstein P, Goodale C, Heimann M, Houghton RA, Melillo JM, Moore B, Murdiyarso D, Noble I, Pacala SW, Prentice IC, Raupach MR, Rayner PJ, Scholes RJ, Steffen WL, Wirth C. Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 2001;414:169-72.
2. Scholes RJ, Noble IR. Storing carbon on land. Science 2001;294:1012-3.
3. Martin PH, Nabuurs G-J, Aubinet M, Karjalainen T, Vine EL, Kinsman J, Heath LS. Carbon sinks in temperate forests. Annu Rev Environ 2001;26:435-65.
4. Schlamadinger B, Marland G. Land use and global climate change: forests, land management and the Kyoto Protocol. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2000. Downloaded from and available on the Internet http://www.pewclimate.org/projects/land_use.cfm.
5. The Royal Society. The role of land carbon sinks in mitigating global climate change. Policy document, The Royal Society, United Kingdom, 2001, ISBN 0 85403 561 3. Downloaded from and available on the Internet http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk.
6. Obersteiner M, Azar C, Kauppi P, Möllersten K, Moreira J, Nilsson S, Read P, Riahi K, Schlamadinger B, Yamagata Y, Yan J, van Ypersele J-P. Managing climate risk. Science 2001;294(5543):786b.
7. Obersteiner M, Rametsteiner E, Nilsson S. Cap management for LULUCF options: an economic mechanism design to preserve the environmental and social integrity of forest related LULUCF activities under the Kyoto Protocol. Interim Report IR-00-063, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 2001.
8. Ewel JJ, Mazzarino MJ, Berrish CW. Tropical soil fertility changes under monocultures and successional communities of different structure. Ecological Applications 1991;1:289-302.
9. Daily GC. Nature;s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 1997.
10. Noss RF. Beyond Kyoto: forest management in a time of rapid change. Conservation Biology 2001;15:578-90.
11. Nilsson S. Do we have enough forests? IUFRO Occasional Paper, No. 5, 1996, ISSN 1024-414X.
12. Schlamadinger B, Grubb M, Azar C, Bauen A, Berndes G. Carbon sinks and biomass energy production: a study of linkages, options and implications. Climate Strategies, International Network for Climate Policy Analysis, 2001.
13. FAO. FAO Regional study on wood energy: today and tomorrow in Asia. Bangkok, October 1997, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 1997.
14. FAO. FAO The energy and agriculture nexus. Environment and Natural Resource Service, Sustainable Development Department. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 2000.
15. Miranda ML, Hale B. Protecting the forest form the trees: the social cost of energy production in Sweden. Energy 2001;26:869-89.
16. Nilsson S, Shvidenko A, Gluck M, Stolbovoi V, Jonas M, Obersteiner M. Full carbon account for Russia. Interim Report IR-00-021, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 2000.
17. 2 emissions and sinks according to UNFCCC and EU monitoring mechanism: forest and other wooded land. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 2000;4(4):315-9.
18. Weiss P, Schieler K, Schadauer K, Radunsky K, Englisch M. Die Kohlenstoffbilanz des österreichischen Waldes und Betrachtungen zum Kyoto Protokoll. Monographien Band 106, Federal Environmental Agency, Vienna, Austria, 2000.
19. 2 emission quota. Manuscript accepted for publication in The World Resource Review, 2001.
20. 2 removal. Energy Conversion Management 1992;33(5-8):437-41.
21. 2 mitigation from coal fired power plants and the transportation sector. US Department of Energy, 1996.
22. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. 22nd report: Energy - the changing climate, London, United Kingdom, 2000.
23. 2 sequestering and disposal. In: Proceedings of Minisymposium on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1999.
24. 2 problem without tears. International Joumal Hydrogen Energy 1989;14(8):493-506.
25. Falkowski P, Scholes RJ, Boyle E, Canadell J, Canfield D, Elser J, Gruber N, Hibbard K, Högberg P, Linder S, Mackenzie FT, Moore III B, Pedersen T, Rosenthal Y, Seitzinger S, Smetacek V, Steffen W. The global carbon cycle: a test of our knowledge of earth as a system. Science 2000;290,291:291-6.
26. 2 emission targets: the role of carbon dioxide removal. 2001. Downloaded from and available on the Internet http://www.jrc.es/iptsreport/vol16/english/BIOIE166.htm.
27. Metz B, Davidson O, Swart R, Pan, J. Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC). Climate change 2001. Mitigation Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Obersteiner M, Azar C, Moellersten K, Riahi K, Moreira J, Nilsson S, et al., IR-02-042, Biomass energy, carbon removal and permanent sequestration - a 'Real Option' for managing climate risk. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 2002.
29. 2 - carbon sequestration from fossil fuels and biomass energy. Mimeo, Department of Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg, Sweden, 2001.
30. 2 sequestration from fossil fuels and biomass energy. Mimeo Department of Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers University, Gothenberg, Sweden, 2002.
31. Barreto L, Makihira A, Riahi K. Hydrogen Production from Biomass with Carbon Capture and Sequestration. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002 (forthcoming).
32. Hasenauer H, Moser M, Eckmüllner O. MOSES - Ein Einzelbaumwachstumssimulator zur Modellierung von Wachstumsreaktionen. AFZ 1995;50(4):216-8.
33. Jonas M, Nilsson S. The Austrian carbon database (ACDb) study - overview. IR-01-064, Interim Report, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 2001.
34. Kennel R. Die Buchendurchforstungsversuche in Bayern (von 1870 bis 1970). Institut für Ertragskunde der Forstl. Forschungsanstalt München 1972;7:264 S.
35. Assmann E, Franz F. Vorläufige Fichtenertragstafel für Bayern. Forstw. Centralblatt 1963;84:1-68.
36. Johann K. Der A-Wert ein objektiver Parameter zur Bestimmung der Freistellstärke von Zentralbäumen. AFJZ 1982;136:149-89.
37. Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management. 2001. Downloaded from and available on the Internet http://www.lebensministerium.at/forst/.
38. Mayer H. Waldbau: auf soziologisch- ökologischer Grundlage. 4, bearb. Auflage. Stuttgart: Jena: New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1992.
39. Pollanschütz J, Enk H, Johann K. Auslesedurchforstung in Fichte. Seminar Hemstein/NÖ, FBVA Wien-Schönbrunn, 1982.
40. Leibundgut H. Rolle und Grundlagen der Planung beim schweizerischen Femelschlag- und Plenterbetrieb. SZFW 103, 1952.
41. Assmann E. Buchenlichtungswuchsbetrieb. FWCBL 84, 1965.