The impact of hands-free message reception/response on driving task performance

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 23-35

  Cooper, Peter J ^a   Zheng, Yvonne ^a   Richard, Christian ^a   Vavrik, John ^a   Heinrichs, Brad ^b   Siegmund, Gunter ^b  

^a Insurance Corporation of British Columbia   (Canada)

^b Macinnis Engineering Associates Ltd   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory task; Distraction; Driver performance

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; DRIVER TRAINING; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRAFFIC SIGNALS;

MESSAGE RECEPTION;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CAR DRIVING; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CELLULAR PHONE; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037207484     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00083-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alm H., Nilsson L. Changes in driver behavior as a function of hands-free mobile phones: a simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 26(4):1994;441-451.
2. Andrea, D.J., Fildes, B.N., Triggs, T.J., 1999. The assessment of safe and unsafe turns by young and older drivers. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Barcelona, pp. 213-224.
3. Brookhuis K.A., deVries G., de Waard D. The effects of mobile telephoning on driver performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 23(4):1991;309-316.
4. Cain, A., Burris, M., 1999. Investigation of the Use of Mobile Phones While Driving, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa.
5. Caird J.K., Hancock P.A. The perception of arrival time for different oncoming vehicles at an intersection. Ecological Psychology. 6(2):1994;83-109.
6. Cooper P.J. Differences in accident characteristics among elderly drivers and between elderly and middle-aged drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 22(5):1990;499-508.
7. Davies, D.R., Jones, D.M., Taylor, A., 1984. Selective and Sustained Attention Tasks: Individual and Group Differences. Varieties of Attention, Academic Press, New York, pp. 395-447.
8. Guerrier J.H., Manivannan P., Nair S.N. The role of working memory, field dependence, visual search and reaction time in the left-turn performance of older female drivers. Applied Ergonomics. 30:1999;109-119.
9. Hancock, P.A., Caird, J.K., 1993. The Left-Turn. Human Factors Research Laboratory, University of Minnesota.
10. Hancock, P.A., Caird, J.K., Shekhar, S., 1991. Factors influencing drivers' left-turn decisions. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, San Francisco, pp. 1139-1143.
11. Laberge-Nadeau, C., Maag, U., Desjardins, D., Messier, S., Cedras, L., Bourbeau, R., 1998. Cellular Phones and the Risk of Car Crashes: Feasibility of an Epidemiological Study. Laboratory on Transportation Safety, University of Montreal Ecole Polytechnique.
12. Lamble D., Kauranen T., Laakso M., Summala H. Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 31:1999;617-623.
13. Lee, J.D., Caven, B., Haake, S., Brown, T.L., 2000. Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: the effect of speech-based e-mail on drivers' attention to the roadway. Internet Forum on Driver Distraction, NHTSA.
14. Matthias, J.S., DeNicholas, M.E., Thomas, G.B., 1996. A Study of the Relationship Between Left-Turn Accidents and Driver Age in Arizona. Center for Advanced Transportation Systems Research, Arizona State University, Tempe.
15. Noy, I., Cassidy, H., Brown, C.M., 1999. Quality of Driving with Cellular Telephones. Technical Memorandum TME 9901. Road and Motor Vehicle Regulation Directorate, Transport Canada, Ottawa.
16. Parkes, A., Hooijmeijer, V., 2000. The influence of the use of mobile phones on driver situation awareness. Internet Forum on Driver Distraction, NHTSA.
17. Pavio, A., Yuille, J.C., Madigan, S.A., 1968. Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 words. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 76 (Part 2).
18. Preusser D.E., Williams A.F., Ferguson S.A., Ulmer R.G., Weinstein H.B. Fatal crash risk for older drivers at intersections, accident analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 30(2):1998;151-159.
19. Ranney T.A. Models of driving behavior: a review of their evolution. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 26(6):1994;733-750.
20. Ranney, T.A., Mazzae, E., Garrott, R., Goodman, M.J., 2000. NHTSA driver distraction research: past, present and future. Internet Forum on Driver Distraction, NHTSA.
21. Recarte M.A., Nunes L.M. Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 6(1):2000;31-43.
22. Redelmeier M.D., Tibshirani R.J. Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. The New England Journal of Medicine. 336(7):1997;453-458.
23. Staplin L. Simulator and field measures of driver age differences in left-turn gap judgments. Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record. 1485:1995;49-55.
24. Tijerina, L., 2000. Issues in the evaluation of driver distraction associated with in-vehicle information and telecommunications systems. Internet Forum on Driver Distraction, NHTSA.
25. Vollrath, M., Totzke, I., 2000. In-vehicle communication and driving: an attempt to overcome their interference. Internet Forum on Driver Distraction, NHTSA.