Optical Response of Two-Dimensional Electron Fluids Beyond the Kohn Regime: Strong Nonparabolic Confinement and Intense Laser Light

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 28, 2002, Pages

  Santer, M ^a   Mehlig, B ^b   Moseler, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRIER CONCENTRATION; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; GROUND STATE; HARMONIC GENERATION; HETEROJUNCTIONS; HYDRODYNAMICS; LASERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR OPTICS; QUANTUM THEORY; SEMICONDUCTING GALLIUM ARSENIDE; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

ELECTRON ELECTRON INTERACTION; ELECTRON FLUIDS; INTENSE LASER LIGHT; NONPARABOLIC CONFINEMENT; OPTICAL RESPONSE; QUANTUM STRIPS; TIME DEPENDENT DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY;

ELECTRON GAS;

EID: 0037207424     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.286801     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. T. Ando et al, Rev. Mod. Phys.10.1103/RevModPhys.54.437 54, 437 (1982).
2. L.P. Kouwenhoven et al, Rep. Prog. Phys.10.1088/0034-4885/64/6/201 64, 701 (2001).
3. Y. Alhassid, Rev. Mod. Phys.10.1103/RevModPhys.72.895 72, 895 (2000).
4. T. Egeler et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1804 65, 1804 (1990).
5. M. Voßebürger et al, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 13, 1045 (1996).
6. W. Kohn, Phys. Rev.10.1103/PhysRev.123.1242 123, 1242 (1961).
7. J.F. Dobson, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2244 73, 2244 (1994).
8. S.K. Yip, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.43.1707 43, 1707 (1991).
9. W.L. Schaich et al, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.53.13016 53, 13016 (1996).
10. K. Lier and R.R. Gerhardts, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.48.14416 48, 14416 (1993).
11. T. Demel et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.788 64, 788 (1990).
12. X. Chu and S.-I. Chu, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.63.023411 63, 023411 (2001).
13. A. L'Huiller et al, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, edited by M. Gavrila (Academic, New York, 1992), Suppl.�1.
14. F. Calvayarac et al, Phys. Rev. B 52, R17056 (1995).
15. S. van Gisbergen et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3097 78, 3097 (1997).
16. F. Calvayrac et al, Phys. Rep.10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00043-0 337, 493 (2000).
17. C. Stanciu et al, (to be published).
18. O.E. Alon et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5218 85, 5218 (2000).
19. N.H. Bonadeo et al, Phys. Status Solidi (b) 221, 5 (2000).
20. T. Guenther et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.057401 89, 057401 (2002).
21. L. Jönsson and G. Wendin, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 9, 627 (1992).
22. L. Brey et al, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.42.1240 42, 1240 (1990).
23. W.L. Schaich and A.H. McDonald, Solid State Commun.SSCOA410.1016/0038-1098(92)90026-6 83, 779 (1992).
24. M. Koskinen et al, Z. Phys. DZDACE2 31, 125 (1994).
25. C. Yannouleas, Chem. Phys. Lett.10.1016/0009-2614(92)85852-2 193, 587 (1992).
26. A.L. Fetter, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.33.5221 33, 5221 (1986).
27. E.K.U. Gross et al, in Topics in Current Chemistry, edited by J.D. Dunitz et al, (1990), Vol.�181, pp.�81–171.
28. M. Santer and B. Mehlig, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.63.241403 63, 241403 (2001).
29. Within the TDDFT, the dynamics is determined by the time-dependent Kohn-Sham equations
30. K. Yabana and G.F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.54.4484 54, 4484 (1996).
31. B. Tanatar and D.M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.39.5005 39, 5005 (1989).
32. W. Kohn and L.J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).
33. See Ref.�36 in M. Moseler and U. Landman, Science10.1126/science.289.5482.1165 289, 1165 (2000).
34. M. Brack, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 677 (1993).
35. W.D. Myers, Phys. Rev. C10.1103/PhysRevC.15.2032 15, 2032 (1977).
36. In simple metal clusters, by contrast, plasmon modes are predominantly rigid-shift modes
37. A. Puente et al, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.64.235324 64, 235324 (2001).