-
1
-
-
33750016779
-
-
P.C. Hohenberg, Phys. Rev.10.1103/PhysRev.158.383 158, 383 (1967).
-
(1967)
Phys. Rev.
, vol.158
, pp. 383
-
-
Hohenberg, P.C.1
-
3
-
-
39249084077
-
-
A. Görlitz et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.130402 87, 130402 (2001).
-
(2001)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.87
, pp. 130402
-
-
Görlitz, A.1
-
4
-
-
37649030128
-
-
S. Dettmer et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.160406 87, 160406 (2001).
-
(2001)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.87
, pp. 160406
-
-
Dettmer, S.1
-
5
-
-
0035807401
-
-
W. Hänsel, P. Hommelhoff, T.W. Hänsch, and J. Reichel, Nature (London)10.1038/35097032 413, 498 (2001).
-
(2001)
Nature (London)
, vol.413
, pp. 498
-
-
Hänsel, W.1
Hommelhoff, P.2
Reichel, J.3
-
6
-
-
3242882278
-
-
H. Ott, J. Fortágh, G. Schlotterbeck, A. Grossmann, and C. Zimmermann, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.230401 87, 230401 (2001).
-
(2001)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.87
, pp. 230401
-
-
Ott, H.1
Fortágh, J.2
Schlotterbeck, G.3
Grossmann, A.4
Zimmermann, C.5
-
7
-
-
37649033096
-
-
M. Greiner, I. Bloch, O. Mandel, T.W. Hänsch, and T. Esslinger, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.160405 87, 160405 (2001).
-
(2001)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.87
, pp. 160405
-
-
Greiner, M.1
Bloch, I.2
Mandel, O.3
Esslinger, T.4
-
8
-
-
0039844705
-
-
W. Ketterle and N.J. van Druten, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.54.656 54, 656 (1996);
-
(1996)
Phys. Rev. A
, vol.54
, pp. 656
-
-
Ketterle, W.1
-
9
-
-
0000893367
-
-
N.J. van Druten and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.549 79, 549 (1997).
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.79
, pp. 549
-
-
Ketterle, W.1
-
12
-
-
0034296965
-
-
D.S. Petrov, G.V. Shlyapnikov, and J.T.M. Walraven, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3745 85, 3745 (2000);
-
(2000)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.85
, pp. 3745
-
-
-
13
-
-
85038289964
-
-
87, 050404 (2001).
-
(2001)
, vol.87
, pp. 50404
-
-
-
22
-
-
85038269233
-
-
Observe that, if (Formula presented) is close to the ideal gas prediction (Formula presented)
-
Observe that, if (Formula presented) is close to the ideal gas prediction (Formula presented)
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
0035440643
-
-
The point that the standard non-number-conserving Bogoliubov approach, when applied to the Bogoliubov inequality, is inconsistent with existing Bose-Einstein condensates has also been made by A.C. Olinto, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.64.033606 64, 033606 (2001). However, it was claimed that, as a consequence, there is a need to modify the canonical commutation relations, leading to explicit dependence of the Bogoliubov inequality on particle interaction. It was shown here that this modification is not necessary, and that explicit dependence on interaction does not need to occur.
-
(2001)
Phys. Rev. A
, vol.64
, pp. 33606
-
-
Olinto, A.C.1
-
24
-
-
0035914971
-
-
M.D. Girardeau and E.M. Wright, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.210401 87, 210401 (2001).
-
(2001)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.87
, pp. 210401
-
-
-
25
-
-
0036536870
-
-
S. Giovanazzi, D. O'Dell, and G. Kurizki, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.130402 88, 130402 (2002) discussed a “supersolid” phase for a self-bound condensate, in the presence of an additional laser-induced interaction potential.
-
(2002)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.88
, pp. 130402
-
-
Giovanazzi, S.1
O'Dell, D.2
Kurizki, G.3
|