Dynamic modelling, simulation and control of a manipulator with flexible links and joints

Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 257-270

  Subudhi, Bidhyadhar ^a   Morris, Alan S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Flexible joint; Flexible link; Manipulator; Singular perturbation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; JOINTS (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

FLEXIBLE LINKS;

FLEXIBLE MANIPULATORS;

EID: 0037207054     PISSN: 09218890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00295-6     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Book W.J. Recursive Lagrangian dynamics of flexible manipulator arms. International Journal of Robotics Research. 3(3):1984;87-101.
2. Khorasani K. Adaptive control of flexible joint-robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. 8(2):1992;251-267.
3. P.V. Kokotovic, H.K. Khalil, J. O'Reilly, Singular perturbation methods in control: analysis and design, in: SIAM Classics in Applied Mathematics, vol. 25, Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1999.
4. Y.J. Lin, S.D. Gogate, Modelling and motion simulation of an n-link flexible robot with elastic joints, in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Robotics and Manufacturing, Santa Barbara, CA, 1989, pp. 39-43.
5. De Luca A., Siciliano B. Closed-form dynamic model of planar multi-link lightweight robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 21(4):1991;826-839.
6. L. Meirovitch, Analytical Methods in Vibration, Macmillan, New York, 1967.
7. K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice-Hall International, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997.
8. Siciliano B., Book W.J. A singular perturbation approach to control of lightweight flexible manipulators. International Journal of Robotics Research. 7(4):1988;79-90.
9. L.M. Sweet, M.C. Good, Re-definition of the robot motion control problem: effects of plant dynamics, drive systems, constraints and user requirement, in: Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, NV, 1984, pp. 724-731.
10. Theodore R., Ghosal A. Comparison of the assumed modes and finite element models for flexible multi-link manipulators. International Journal of Robotics Research. 14(2):1995;91-111.
11. G.B. Yang, M. Donath, Dynamic model of a two-link robot manipulator with both structural and joint flexibility, in: Proceedings of the ASME 1988 Winter Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 1988, pp. 37-44.