Amount of training and stimulus salience affect associability changes in serial conditioning

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 169-183

  Holland, Peter C ^a   Bashaw, Meredith ^b   Quinn, Jennifer ^c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Associability; Attention; Stimulus salience; Stimulus selection

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; RAT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0037201560     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00092-X     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bucci D.J., Holland P.C., Gallagher M. Removal of cholinergic input to rat posterior parietal cortex disrupts incremental processing of conditioned stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience. 18:1998;8038-8046.
2. Chiba A.A., Bucci D.J., Holland P.C., Gallagher M. Basal forebrain cholinergic lesions disrupt increments but not decrements in conditioned stimulus processing. Journal of Neuroscience. 15:1995;7315-7322.
3. Fox, G.D., (1998). The hippocampus and stimulus selection. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
4. Han J.S., Gallagher M., Holland P.C. Hippocampal lesions disrupt decrements but not increments in conditioned stimulus processing. Journal of Neuroscience. 11:1995;7323-7329.
5. Holland P.C. Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 3:1977;77-104.
6. Holland P.C. Brain mechanisms for changes in processing of conditioned stimuli in Pavlovian conditioning: implications for behavior theory. Animal Learning and Behavior. 25:1997;373-399.
7. Holland P.C. Trial and intertrial durations in appetitive conditioning in rats. Animal Learning and Behavior. 28:2000;121-135.
8. Holland P.C., Chik Y., Zhang Q. Inhibitory learning tests of conditioned stimulus associability in rats with lesions of the amygdala central nucleus. Behavioral Neuroscience. 115:2001;1154-1158.
9. Holland P.C., Gallagher M. Amygdala central nucleus lesions disrupt increments, but not decrements, in CS processing. Behavioral Neuroscience. 107:1993a;246-253.
10. Holland P.C., Gallagher M. Effects of amygdala central nucleus lesions on blocking and unblocking. Behavioral Neuroscience. 107:1993b;235-245.
11. Holland P.C., Gallagher M. Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 3:1999;65-73.
12. Holland P.C., Ross R.T. Savings test for associations between neutral stimuli. Animal Learning and Behavior. 11:1983;83-90.
13. Kaye H., Pearce J.M. The strength of the orienting response during blocking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 36B:1984;131-144.
14. Pearce J.M., Hall G. A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review. 106:1980;532-552.
15. Pearce J.M., Kaye H., Hall G. Predictive accuracy and stimulus associability: development of a model for Pavlovian conditioning. Commons M., Herrnstein R., Wagner A.R., Quantitative Analysis of Behavior. 1982;241-255 Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
16. Siegel S. Effects of CS habituation on eyelid conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 68:1969;245-248.
17. Swan J.A., Pearce J.M. The orienting response as an index of stimulus associability in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 14:1988;292-301.
18. Wilson P.N., Boumphrey P., Pearce J.M. Restoration of the orienting response to a light by a change in its predictive accuracy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 44B:1992;17-36.