Doctor or patient - Who will decide?;Arzt oder patient - Wer entscheidet?

Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift

Volumn 127, Issue 39, 2002, Pages 2021-2024

  Isfort, J ^a   Floer, B ^a   Koneczny, N ^a   Vollmar, H C ^a   Butzlaff, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT; PHYSICIAN; REVIEW; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 0037184166     PISSN: 00120472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-34359     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Beaver K et al. Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 1996; 19: 8-19
2. Böcken J, Braun B, Schnee M, Gesundheitsmonitor 2002. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann-Stiftung, 2002
3. 3rd Braddock CH et al. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 1999; 282: 2313-2320
4. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 681-692
5. Charnock D et al. Discern: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices; Deutsche Version des Discern-Instruments unter: http://www.discern.de/. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53: 105-111
6. Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back. BMJ 1999; 319: 719-720
7. Deber RB. Shared decision making in the real world. J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11: 377-378
8. Elwyn G et al. Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars. BMJ 1999; 319: 753-756
9. Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet. BMJ 1998; 317: 1496-1500
10. Eysenbach G, Sa ER, Diepgen TL. Cybermedicine. BMJ 1999; 319: 1294
11. Fox S, Rainie L. The online health care revolution. Pew Charitable Trusts: Washington, DC, 2000
12. Garrud P, Wood M, Stainsby L. Impact of risk information in a patient education leaflet. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 43: 301-304
13. Gattellari M et al. When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions? J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 503-513
14. Gibson PG et al. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000: 2
15. Korsch B, Negrette V. Doctor-patient communication. Sci Am 1972; 227: 66-74
16. Larsson S, Poensgen A. BCG-Studie: Patients, Physicians and the internet - Myth, Reality and Implications. Boston Consulting Group, 2001
17. Lidz CW et al. Barriers to informed consent. Ann Intern Med 1983; 99: 539-543
18. Rieger D. Rechtliche Bedeutung eines Patiententestaments für den Arzt. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1999; 124: 945-947
19. Rowland JH, Holland JC. Breast cancer, University Press: New York, Oxford, in The Handbook of Psychooncology, J.H. Rowland and H. J.C., Ed. 1989: 188-207
20. Spittler JF, Fritscher-Ravens A. Der Patientenwille zwischen Rechtsprechung, ärztlicher Sachlichkeit und Empathie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2001; 126: 925-8
21. Strull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA 1984; 252: 2990-2994
22. Taylor H. Cyberchondriacs Update. Harris Interactive. Harris Poll #21. Online. New York. NY. Available at http://www.louisharris.com/.2002
23. Thamm M. Blutdruck in Deutschland - Zustandsbeschreibungen und Trends. Gesundheitswesen 1999; 61 (Sonderheft 2): 90-93
24. Waterworth S. Luker K. Reluctant collaborators. J Adv Nurs 1990; 15: 971-976