Removal of the mandatory reporting provisions - Only a Pyrrhic victory?

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 115, Issue 1162, 2002, Pages

  Coates, Jonathan ^a,b  

^a Buddle Findlay   (New Zealand)

^b NONE   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETENCE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; LAW ENFORCEMENT; LEGAL ASPECT; LEGAL LIABILITY; MALPRACTICE; MANDATORY REPORTING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NOTE; PATIENT RIGHT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUNISHMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; ARTICLE; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; ETHICS; NEW ZEALAND; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT;

CONSUMER ADVOCACY; MANDATORY REPORTING; NEW ZEALAND; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT;

EID: 0037183812     PISSN: 11758716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (3)

1. Ministry of Health web site. URL: www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/
2. New Zealand Medical Association. Code of ethics. URL: http://www.nzma.org.nz/about/ethics.html Accessed September 2002.
3. Medical Council of New Zealand. Good medical practice: a guide for doctors. Wellington: Medical Council of New Zealand; 2002.