The long-term benefits of orthodontic treatment

British Dental Journal

Volumn 192, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 583-587

  Linklater, R A ^a   Fox, N A ^b  

^a EDINBURGH DENTAL INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLASSIFICATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PEER REVIEW; PHOTOGRAPHY; RECURRENT DISEASE; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COHORT STUDIES; DENTAL MODELS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ORTHODONTIC RETAINERS; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PHOTOGRAPHY; RECURRENCE; STATISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037172215     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801433     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Dental Practice Board. Digest of Statistics 1999/2000.
2. DHSS. Report of the Committee of Enquiry into Unnecessary Dental Treatment. London. HMSO. 1986.
3. DHSS. Report of the Occlusal Index Committee. Report No 92821/1/48-3. London: HMSO, 1987
4. Richmond S, Shaw W C, Roberts C T, Andrews M Orthodontics in the General Dental Service of England and Wales: A critical assessment of standards Br Dent J 1993, 174: 315-329.
5. O'Brien K D, Shaw W C, Roberts C T. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 25-35.
6. Harrison J E. Evidence-based orthodontics: Where do I find the evidence? J Orthod 2000; 27: 71-78
7. Cannavina C D, Cannavina G, Walsh T F Effects of evidence-based treatment and consent on professional autonomy Br Dent J 2000; 188: 302-306
8. Al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman A M, van't Hof M A. Assessment of biological changes in a nonorthodontic sample using the PAR index Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998, 114: 224-228
9. Birkeland K, Boe O E, Wisth P J. Relationship between occlusion and satisfaction with dental appearance in orthodontically treated and untreated groups A longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod 2000, 22: 509-518
10. Cooper S, Mandall N A, DiBiase D, Shaw W C The reliability of the index of orthodontic treatment need over time. J Orthod 2000; 27: 47-53.
11. Fox N A. The first 100 cases A personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) index. Br Dent J 1993; 174: 290-297.
12. Artun J, Garol J D, Little R M. Long-term stability of mandibular incisors following successful treatment of Class II, Division 1, malocclusions Angle Orthod 1996; 66: 229-238
13. Birkelanr JK, Furevik J, Boe O E Wisth P J Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index Eur J Orthod 1997; 19: 279-288.
14. Al Yami E A, Kuijpers-Jagtman A M, van 't Hof M A. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years postretention Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115: 300-304.
15. Canut J A, Arias S A long-term evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusionsa retrospective study model analysis Eur J Orthod 1999; 21: 377-386
16. Little R M. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: University of Washington studies. Semin Orthod 1999, 5: 191-204.
17. Berset G P, Eilertsen I M, Lagerstrom L, Espeland L, Stenvik A. Outcome of a scheme for specialist orthodontic care. Swed Dent J 2000; 24: 39-48.
18. Woods M, Lee D, Crawford E Finishing occlusion, degree of stability and the PAR index. Aust Orthod J 2000, 16: 9-15
19. Ngan P, Yiu C Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index Am J Orthod Dento facial Orthop 2000; 118: 414-420
20. Little R M, Riedal R A, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition, postretention evaluation of stability and relapse Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990, 97: 393-404.
21. Richmond S, Shaw W C, Stephens C D, et al. The development of the PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating) reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 125-139
22. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts C T, Andrews M. The PAR (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 180-187.
23. Kerr W J S, Buchanan I B, McColl J H. Use of the PAR index in assessing the effectiveness of removable appliances. Br J Orthod 1993, 20: 351-357
24. Fox N A, Chadwick S C. The first 100 cases of orthodontic treatment, one year out of retention. Dent Update 1994; 27: 288-297.
25. Berg R Evaluation of orthodontic results - a discussion of some methodological aspects. Angle Orthod 1991, 61: 261-266
26. Elderton R J Longitudinal study of dental treatment in the general dental service in Scotland. Br Dent J 1983, 155: 91-96.
27. Walton T R A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics clinical characteristics and outcome of single-unit metal-ceramic crowns Int J Prosthodont 1999, 12: 519-526.
28. Capron A In McNeill P The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation pp 126. Cambridge Press, 1993