Phase transition in complex |Ψ|4 theory

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 13, 2002, Pages

  Bittner, Elmar ^a   Janke, Wolfhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION METHODS; HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

HYPERBOLIC LATTICES;

PHASE TRANSITIONS;

EID: 0037163813     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.130201     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996), 3rd ed.
2. H. Kleinert and V. Schulte-Frohlinde, Critical Properties of (formula presented)-Theories (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001).
3. H. Kleinert, Phys. Rev. Lett.
4. P. Curty and H. Beck, Phys. Rev. Lett.
5. P. Curty and H. Beck.
6. H. Fort.
7. G. Alvarez and H. Fort, Phys. Rev. B
8. G. Alvarez and H. Fort, Phys. Lett. A 282, 399 (2001).
9. G. Alvarez and H. Fort, Phys. Rev. B
10. The method of Ref. [4] uses (formula presented) model data as input.
11. H. Kleinert, Superflow and Vortex Lines, Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter Vol. I (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).
12. V. M. Loktev, R. M. Quick, andS. G. Sharapov, Phys. Rep. 349, 1 (2001).
13. W. Janke and H. Kleinert, Nucl. Phys. B270, 399 (1986).
14. See the discussion in Sec. 5.7 of the textbook [11].
15. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, andE. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).
16. W. Janke, Math. Comput. Simul. 47, 329 (1998);
17. W. JankeComputational Physics: Selected Methods-Simple Exercises-Serious Applications, edited by K. H. Hoffmann and M. Schreiber (Springer, Berlin, 1996), p. 10.
18. U. Wolff, Phys. Rev. Lett.
19. U. WolffNucl. Phys. B322, 759 (1989).
20. M. Hasenbusch and T. Török, J. Phys. A 32, 6361 (1999).
21. W. Janke, Phys. Lett. A 148, 306 (1990).
22. B. Efron, The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics [SIAM], Philadelphia, 1982).
23. There is another difference between our update and the update described in the papers [5,9], namely, that we do not restrict the modulus of the field to a finite interval. This can cause further systematic deviations but we explicitly checked that this is unimportant for the main point here.
24. P. Minnhagen and M. Wallin, Phys. Rev. B
25. G.-M. Zhang, H. Chen, and X. Wu, Phys. Rev. B 48, 12 304 (1993);
26. D. Yu. Irz, V. N. Ryzhov, and E. E. Tareyeva, Phys. Rev. B
27. H. Kleinert, Stresses and Defects, Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter Vol. II (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).
28. W. Janke, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 29, 1251 (1990).
29. R. Giachetti, V. Tognetti, and R. Vaia, Phys. Rev. A
30. T. Sauer, Ph.D. thesis, FU Berlin, 1994 (unpublished).
31. W. Janke and T. Sauer, Phys. Lett. A 197, 335 (1995).