Enantioselective synthesis of the C11-C17 segment of soraphen A1α via organoiron methodology

Tetrahedron Letters

Volumn 43, Issue 43, 2002, Pages 7831-7834

  Cao, Yeyu ^a   Eweas, Ahmad Farouk ^a   Donaldson, William A ^a  

^a Marquette University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIFUNGAL AGENT; GLYCERALDEHYDE; SORAPHEN A; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SYNTHESIS; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; NONHUMAN;

EID: 0037152307     PISSN: 00404039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(02)01727-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bedorf N., Schomburg D., Gerth K., Reichenbach H., Höfle G. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1993;1017-1021.
2. Schummer D., Jahn T., Höfle G. Liebigs Ann. 1995;803-816.
3. Abel S., Faber D., Hüter O., Giese B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 33:1994;2466-2468.
4. Abel S., Faber D., Hüter O., Giese B. Synthesis. 1999;197.
5. Lee H.W., Yong J.K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 17:1996;1107-1108.
6. For other examples of 1,6-asymmetric control using (diene)iron complexes, see: (a) Roush, W. R.; Wada, C. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2151-2152; (b) Takemoto, Y.; Baba, Y.; Saha, G.; Nakao, S.; Iwata, C.; Tanaka, T.; Ibuka, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3653-3656. For examples of 1,8- and 1,10-asymmetric induction using (diene)iron complexes, see: © Takemoto, Y.; Ishii, K.; Honda, A.; Okamoto, K.; Yanada, R.; Ibuka, T. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1445-1446; (d) Takemoto, Y.; Ishii, K.; Ibuka, T.; Miwa, Y.; Taga, T.; Nakao, S.; Tanaka, T.; Ohishi, H.; Kai, Y.; Kanehisa, N. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6116-6123.
7. For other examples of 1,6-asymmetric control using (diene)iron complexes, see: (a) Roush, W. R.; Wada, C. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2151-2152; (b) Takemoto, Y.; Baba, Y.; Saha, G.; Nakao, S.; Iwata, C.; Tanaka, T.; Ibuka, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3653-3656. For examples of 1,8- and 1,10-asymmetric induction using (diene)iron complexes, see: © Takemoto, Y.; Ishii, K.; Honda, A.; Okamoto, K.; Yanada, R.; Ibuka, T. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1445-1446; (d) Takemoto, Y.; Ishii, K.; Ibuka, T.; Miwa, Y.; Taga, T.; Nakao, S.; Tanaka, T.; Ohishi, H.; Kai, Y.; Kanehisa, N. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6116-6123.
8. For other examples of 1,6-asymmetric control using (diene)iron complexes, see: (a) Roush, W. R.; Wada, C. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2151-2152; (b) Takemoto, Y.; Baba, Y.; Saha, G.; Nakao, S.; Iwata, C.; Tanaka, T.; Ibuka, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3653-3656. For examples of 1,8- and 1,10-asymmetric induction using (diene)iron complexes, see: © Takemoto, Y.; Ishii, K.; Honda, A.; Okamoto, K.; Yanada, R.; Ibuka, T. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1445-1446; (d) Takemoto, Y.; Ishii, K.; Ibuka, T.; Miwa, Y.; Taga, T.; Nakao, S.; Tanaka, T.; Ohishi, H.; Kai, Y.; Kanehisa, N. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6116-6123.
9. For other examples of 1,6-asymmetric control using (diene)iron complexes, see: (a) Roush, W. R.; Wada, C. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2151-2152; (b) Takemoto, Y.; Baba, Y.; Saha, G.; Nakao, S.; Iwata, C.; Tanaka, T.; Ibuka, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3653-3656. For examples of 1,8- and 1,10-asymmetric induction using (diene)iron complexes, see: © Takemoto, Y.; Ishii, K.; Honda, A.; Okamoto, K.; Yanada, R.; Ibuka, T. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1445-1446; (d) Takemoto, Y.; Ishii, K.; Ibuka, T.; Miwa, Y.; Taga, T.; Nakao, S.; Tanaka, T.; Ohishi, H.; Kai, Y.; Kanehisa, N. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6116-6123.
10. Okamura K., Okazaki K., Takeda K., Yoshii E. Tetrahedron Lett. 30:1989;2233-2236.
11. Godula K., Bärmann H., Donaldson W.A. J. Org. Chem. 66:2001;3590-3592.
12. Djedaini F., Grée D., Martelli J., Grée R., Leroy L., Bolard J., Toupet L. Tetrahedron Lett. 30:1989;3781-3784.
13. Nakanishi S., Kumeta K., Nakanishi J.-I., Takata T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 6:1995;2097-2100.
14. Gresham D.G., Lillya C.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92:1970;3065-3075.
15. Kuhn D.E., Lillya C.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94:1972;1682-1688.
16. A similar intramolecular attack of alcoholate anion on iron has been proposed to account for the lack of reactivity of complexes chlorohydrins under basic conditions and for an unusual epimerization. See: (a) Lellouche, J. P.; Bulot, E.; Beaucourt, J. P.; Martelli, J.; Grée, R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 342, C21-C23; (b) Lellouche, J.-P.; Gigou-Barbedette, A.; Grée, R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 461, 167-168.
17. A similar intramolecular attack of alcoholate anion on iron has been proposed to account for the lack of reactivity of complexes chlorohydrins under basic conditions and for an unusual epimerization. See: (a) Lellouche, J. P.; Bulot, E.; Beaucourt, J. P.; Martelli, J.; Grée, R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 342, C21-C23; (b) Lellouche, J.-P.; Gigou-Barbedette, A.; Grée, R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 461, 167-168.
18. Evans D.A., Ratz A.M., Huff B.E., Sheppard G.S. Tetrahedron Lett. 35:1994;7171-7172.
19. Narasaka A.K., Saigo K., Mukaiyama T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 50:1976;2773-2776.
20. For a compilation of results, see: Grée R., Lellouche J.P. Liebeskind L.S., Advances in Metal-Organic Chemistry. 1995;129-273 JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
21. 4 on diastereoselectivity of nucleophilic attack, see: Harvey D.F., Selchau V.B. J. Org. Chem. 65:2000;2282-2286.
22. 3): δ 7.28-7.15 (m, 5H), 5.25 (m, 2H), 4.51 (br d, J=7.9 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (dd, J=3.7, 11.0 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (dd, J=5.8, 11.0 Hz, 1H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 3.04 (m, 1H), 1.85 (br s, OH), 1.22 (m, 1H), 0.88 (m and s, 10H), 0.05 (s, 6H).
23. Donaldson W.A., Jin M.-J., Bell P.T. Organometallics. 12:1993;1174-1179.
24. Gresham D.G., Lillya C.P., Uden P.C., Walters F.H. J. Organomet. Chem. 142:1977;123-131.
25. 3): δ 7.37-7.20 (m, 5H), 5.25 (m, 2H), 4.51 (br d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (dd, J=6.6, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.47 (s and m, 4H), 3.20 (m, 1H), 1.84 (br s, OH), 1.20 (m, 1H), 0.89 (m and s, 9H), 0.05 (s, 6H).
26. 3): δ 143.4, 136.1, 132.9, 132.6, 130.6, 129.2, 128.4, 126.9, 83.5, 75.4, 66.9, 57.6, 26.6, 19.1, -4.5.