Optimal control of unsteady compressible viscous flows

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 40, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1401-1429

  Collis, S Scott ^a   Ghayour, Kaveh ^b   Heinkenschloss, Matthias ^b   Ulbrich, Michael ^c   Ulbrich, Stefan ^d  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Rice University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Compressible Navier Stokes equations; Gradient computation; Optimal flow control

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; FLUID DYNAMICS; KINETIC ENERGY; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; SHEAR STRESS; UNSTEADY FLOW;

ADJOINT EQUATION METHOD;

VISCOUS FLOW;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; FLOW CONTROL; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS; UNSTEADY FLOW; VISCOUS FLOW;

EID: 0037147492     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.420     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Berggren M. Numerical solution of a flow-control problem: vorticity reduction by dynamic boundary action. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1998; 19:829-860.
2. Bewley TR, Moin P, Temam R, DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2001; 447: 179-225.
3. Collis SS, Chang Y. On the use of LES with a dynamic subgrid scale model for the optimal control of wall bounded turbulence. In Recent Advances in DNS and LES, Knight S, Sakell L (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1999; 91-110.
4. Gunzburger MD, Manservisi S. The velocity tracking problem for Navier-Stokes flows with boundary control. SIAM Journal of Control Optimization 2000; 39:594-634.
5. He H, Ghattas O, Antaki JF. Computational strategies for shape optimization of time-dependent Navier-Stokes flows. Technical Report CMU-CML-97-102, Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University, 1997. Electronically available from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~oghattas/.
6. He J-W, Chevalier M, Glowinski R, Metcalfe R, Nordlander A, Periaux J. Drag reduction by active control for flow past cylinders. In Computational Mathematics Driven by Industrial Problems (Martina Franca, 1999). Burkard R, Deuflhard P, Jameson A, Lions JL, Strang G (eds.) Springer, Berlin, 2000; 287-363.
7. He J-W, Glowinski R, Metcalfe R, Nordlander A, Periaux J. Active control and drag optimization for flow past a circular cylinder. I. oscillatory cylinder rotation. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 163:83-117.
8. He JW, Glowinski R, Metcalfe R, Periaux J. A numerical approach to the control and stabilization of advection-diffusion systems: application to viscous drag reduction. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 1998; 11(1-2): 131-156.
9. Homescu C, Navon M, Li Z. Supression of vortex shedding for flow around a cylinder using optimal control. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2002; 38:43-69.
10. Joslin RD, Gunzburger MD, Nicolaides RA, Erlebacher G, Hussaini MY. Self-contained automated methodology for optimal flow control. AIAA Journal 1997; 35(5):816-824.
11. Li Z, Navon M, Hussaini MY, Le Dimet FX. Optimal control of cylinder wakes via suction and blowing. Computers and Fluids 2003; 32:149-171.
12. Borggaard J, Burns J. A PDE sensitivity equation method for optimal aerodynamic design. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 136:366-384.
13. Cliff EM, Heinkenschloss M, Shenoy A. Airfoil design by an all-at-once method. International Journal for Computational Fluid Mechanics 1998; 11:3-25.
14. Jameson A, Martinelli L, Pierce NA. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations. Theoritical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 1998; 10:213-237.
15. Jameson A, Reuther J. Control theory based airfoil design using the Euler equations. In AIAA Paper 94-4272, 1994.
16. Jou WH, Huffman WP, Young DP, Melvin RG, Bieterman MB, Hilems CL, Johnson FT. Practical considerations in aerodynamic design optimization. In Proceedings of the 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, June 19-22 1995, AIAA, AIAA Paper 95-1730, 950-960.
17. Soemarwoto B. The variational method for aerodynamic optimization using the Navier-Stokes equations. Technical Report 97-71, ICASE, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton VA 23681-0001, 1997.
18. Gad el Hak M. (ed.), Flow Control, Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management. Cambridge University Press: New York, 2000.
19. Fursikov AV. Optimal Control of Distributed Systems. Theory and Applications. Translation of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 187. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000.
20. Fursikov AV, Gunzburger MD, Hou LS. Boundary value problems and optimal boundary control for the Navier-Stokes systems: The two-dimensional case. SIAM Journal of Control Optimization 1998; 36:852-894.
21. Collis SS, Ghayour K, Heinkenschloss M, Ulbrich M, Ulbrich S. Numerical solution of optimal control problems governed by the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. In Optimal Control of Complex Structures, International Series of Numerical Mathematics, Hoffmann KH, Lasiecka I, Leugering G. Sprekels J, Tröltzsch F (eds.) vol. 139. Birkhäuser: Basel, 2001; 43-55.
22. Collis SS, Ghayour K, Heinkenschloss M, Ulbrich M, Ulbrich S. Towards adjoint-based methods for aeroacoustic control. In 39th Aerospace Science Meeting & Exhibit, 2001. Electronically available from http://www.caam.rice.edu/heinken.
23. Hoff D. Discountinous solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations for multidimensional flows of heat-conducting fluids. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 1997; 139:303-354.
24. Lions PL. Mathematical Topics in Fluids Mechanics. Volume 2, Compressible Models, Oxford Lecture Series Applications, vol. 10. Claredon Press: Oxford, 1998.
25. Matsumura A, Nishida T. The initial value problem for the equations of motion of viscous and heat-conductive gases. Journal of Mathematics of Kyoto University 1980; 20:67-104.
26. Valli A. Mathematical results for compressible flows. In Mathematical Topics in Fluid Mechanics, Pitman Research Notes Mathematics, Rodriguez JF, Sequeira A (eds), vol. 274. Longman Scientific and Technical: New York, Essex, 1992.
27. Dautray R, Lions JL. Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology, Functional and Variational Methods, vol. 2, Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 1988.
28. Dautray R, Lions JL. Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology, Evolution Problems I, vol. 5. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1992.
29. Renardy M, Rogers RC. An Introduction to Partial Differential Equations. Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 13. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1993.
30. Lele SK. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 103(1):16-42.
31. Tam CKW, Webb JC. Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 107:262-281.
32. Tam CKW, Webb JC, Dong Zhong. A study of the short wave components in computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Acoustics 1993; 1(1): 1-30.
33. Collis SS. A computational investigation of receptivity in high-speed-flow near a swept leading-edge. Ph.D. Thesis. Standford University, 1997. Electronically available from http://mems.rice.edu/~collis
34. Carpenter MH, Gottlieb D, Abarbanel S. Stable and accurate boundary treatments for compact, high-order finite difference schemes. Applied Numerical Mathematics 1993; 12(1-3):55-87.
35. Dennis Jr. JE, Schnabel RB. Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Equations and Unconstrained Optimization. SIAM: Philadelphia, 1996.
36. Heinkenschloss M, Vicente LN. An interface between optimization and application for the numerical solution of optimal control problems. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 1999; 25:157-190.
37. Hager WW. Runge-Kutta methods in optimal control and the transformed adjoint system, Numerische Mathematik 2000; 87:247-282.
38. Lui G, Nocedal J, Waltz R. Cg+: conjugate gradient software. http://www.ece.nwu.edu/~nocedal/software.html.
39. Nocedal J, Wright SJ. Numerical Optimization. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1999.
40. Ulbrich M. Constrained optimal control of Navier-Stokes flow by semi-smooth Newton methods. Systems & Control Letters, 2002, at press.
41. Restrepo JM, Leaf GK, Griewank A. Circumventing storage limitations in variational data assimilation studies. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing 1998; 19:1586-1605.
42. Giering R, Kaminski T. Recipes for adjoint code construction. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 1998; 24:437-474.
43. Colonius T, Lele SK, Moin P. The free compressible viscous vortex. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1991; 230: 45-73.
44. Alekseev AK, Navon IM. The analysis of an ill-posed problem using multi-scale resolution and second-order adjoint techniques. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000; 190:1937-1953.
45. Collis SS, Ghayour K, Heinkenschloss M. Optimal control of aeroacoustic noise generated by cylinder vortex interaction. International Journal of Aeroacoustics 2002; 1:97-114.