Cylindrical tube optimization using response surface method based on stochastic process

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 130-131, Issue , 2002, Pages 490-496

  Lee, Sang Hoon ^a   Kim, Heon Young ^b   Oh, Soo Ik ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Crashworthiness; Global optimization; Response surface method; Stochastic process

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYLINDERS (SHAPES); ENERGY ABSORPTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; RANDOM PROCESSES;

GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION;

TUBES (COMPONENTS);

EID: 0037146980     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00794-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. S.-H. Lee, Explicit finite element analysis based design optimization for improved crashworthiness of integrated restraint seat, Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University, South Korea, 2002.
2. Timoschenko, Gere, Theory of elastic stability, McGraw-Hill, 1961.
3. Edwards I.M., Jutan A. Optimization and control using response surface methods. Comput. Chem. Eng. 21:1997;441-453.
4. Krivy I., Tvrdik J., Krpec R. Stochastic algorithms in nonlinear regression. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 33:2000;277-290.
5. J.S. Arora, Introduction to Optimum Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989.
6. Sacks J., Welch W.J., Mitchell T.J., Wynn H.P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist. Sci. 4:1989;409-435.
7. D. Johns, M. Schonlau, W. Welch, Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions, J. Global Optimization (1998).
8. Yamazaki K., Han J. Maximization of the crushing energy absorption of cylindrical shells. Adv. Eng. Software. 31:2000;425-434.
9. K.K. Choi, S. Cho, Design sensitivity and optimization of nonlinear structural dynamics using DYNA3D, AIAA-98-4721, pp. 148-158.
10. N. Stander, W. Roux, S. Pattabiraman, R. Dhulipudi, The Application of LS-OPT to Design Optimization Problems in Nonlinear Dynamics using LS-DYNA, Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
11. Pardalos P.M., Romeijn H.E., Tuy H. Recent developments and trends in global optimization. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 124:2000;209-228.
12. Lust R. Structural optimization with crashworthiness constraints. Struct. Optimization. 4:1992;85-89.
13. Rule W.K. Response surface for structural optimization. J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., Trans. ASME. 119(3):1997;196-202.
14. M. Schonlau, M. Hamada, W. Welch, Nonparametric function-fitting to suggest nonlinear parametric models, in: Proceedings of the Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences, American Statistical Association, 1995, pp. 262-267.
15. M. Schonlau, W. Welch, Global optimization with nonparametric function-fitting, in: Proceedings of the Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences, American Statistical Association, 1996, pp. 183-186.
16. Belytschko T., Lin J.I., Tsay C.C. Explicit algorithms for the nonlinear dynamics of shells. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 42:1984;225-251.
17. Gunaraj V., Murugan N. Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 88:1999;266-275.
18. Wunderlich W., Albertin U. Analysis and load carrying behavior of imperfection sensitive shells. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 47(1):2000;255-272.
19. Z.H. Zhong, Finite Element Procedures for Contact-Impact Problems, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
20. Pamcrash Reference Manual, PSI, 1998.