Estimating anomalies from indirect observations

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 181, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 398-406

  Kaipio, Jari P ^a   Somersalo, Erkki ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Anomalies; Bayesian inference; Image reconstruction; Inverse problems; Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; INFERENCE ENGINES; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

ANOMALY; BAYESIAN INFERENCE; BAYESIAN SAMPLING; ILL-POSED INVERSE PROBLEM; IMAGES RECONSTRUCTION; INFORMATIVE PRIORS; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO SAMPLINGS; MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES; NUMERICAL RESULTS; PRIOR INFORMATION;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 0037144877     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2002.7109     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. D. Donoho, I. M. Johnstone, J. C. Hoch, and A. S. Stern, Maximum entropy and the nearly black object, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 54, 41 (1992).
2. C. Fox and G. Nicholls, Exact MAP states and expectations from perfect sampling: Greig, Porteous and Seheult revisited, in Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering (CNRS Gif-sur-Yvette, 2000) AIP Conf. Proc. 568, 252-263.
3. W. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D. Spiegelhalter, Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (Chapman and Hall, London, 1996).
4. J. P. Kaipio, V. Kolehmainen, E. Somersalo, and M. Vauhkonen, Statistical inversion and Monte Carlo sampling methofs in electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Probl. 16, 1487 (2000).
5. A. F. M. Smith and G. O. Roberts, Bayesian computation via Gibbs sampler and related Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 55, 3 (1993).
6. A. Tarantola, Inverse Problem Theory (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987).
7. L. Tierney, Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions, Ann. Stat. 22, 1701 (1994).
8. K. Uutela, M. Hämäläinen, and E. Somersalo, Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates, NeuroImage 10, 173 (1999).