메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 176, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 277-278

Hindsight bias in medicolegal expert reports

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; COURT; CRIMINAL LAW; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NEGLIGENCE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PROFESSIONAL SECRECY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW;

EID: 0037128419     PISSN: 0025729X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04407.x     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (39)

References (17)
  • 3
    • 0006390721 scopus 로고
    • Rogers v Whitaker; 175 CLR 479
    • (1992)
  • 5
    • 0034265742 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Malpractice issues in radiology - Hindsight bias
    • (2000) Am J Radiol , vol.175 , pp. 597-601
    • Berlin, L.1
  • 8
    • 33747927436 scopus 로고
    • Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty
    • (1975) J Exp Psychol , vol.1 , pp. 288-299
    • Fischoff, B.1
  • 12
    • 0006469885 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Seltsan Pty Ltd v McGuiness; 49 NSWLR 262
    • (2000)
  • 13
    • 0023242365 scopus 로고
    • Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures
    • (1987) JAMA , vol.258 , pp. 2533-2537
    • Chassin, M.R.1    Kosecoff, J.2    Park, R.E.3
  • 16
    • 0006391501 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Sect 36.13CA


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.