Separating managerial inefficiency and external conditions in data envelopment analysis

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 143, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 625-643

  Muiz, M A ^a  

^a Facultad de Ciencias Económicas   (Spain)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Education; Non controllable inputs

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; EDUCATION; MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRODUCTIVITY;

DATA DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0037121484     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00344-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Banker R.D., Morey R. Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Operations Research. 34(4):1986a;513-521.
2. Banker R.D., Morey R. The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Management Science. 32(12):1986b;1613-1627.
3. Bridge R.G., Judd C.M., Moock P.R. The Determinants of Educational Outcomes. 1979;Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A., Morey, R.C., Rousseau, J. 1980. Efficiency analysis with non-discretionary resources. Research Report CCS 379, University of Texas, Austin.
5. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 2(6):1978;429-444.
6. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: An application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science. 27(6):1981;668-697.
7. Cohn E., Millman S.D., Chew I.-K. Input-Output Analysis in Public Education. 1975;Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
8. Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K. 1996. Searching the Zeds, Working paper presented at II Georgia Productivity Workshop.
9. Fried H.O., Schmidt S.S., Yaisawarng S. Incorporating the operating environment into a nonparametric measure of technical efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 12:1999;249-267.
10. Glasman N.S., Biniaminov I. Input-output analyses of schools. Review of Educational Research. 51(4):1981;509-539.
11. Golany B., Roll Y. some extension of techniques to handle non-discretionary factors in data envelopment analysis. The Journal of Productivity Analysis. 4:1993;132-419.
12. Hanushek E.A. The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature. 24:1986;1141-1177.
13. Lovell C.A.K., Walters L., Wood L. Stratified models of education production using modified DEA and regression analysis. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Lewin A.Y., Seiford L.M. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Application. 1994;329-351 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
14. Mancebón M.J., Bandrés E. Efficiency evaluation in secondary schools: The key role of model specification and of ex post analysis of results. Education Economics. 7(2):1999;131-152.
15. McCarty T.A., Yaisawarng S. Technical efficiency in New Jersey school districts. Fried H., Lovell C., Schmidt S. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. 1993;271-287 Oxford University Press, New York.
16. Muñiz M.A. Introducción de variables de control en modelos DEA. Pinilla A. La medición de la eficiencia y la productividad. 2001;Ed. Pirámide.
17. Pastor, J.T. 1994. How to discount environmental effects in DEA: An application to bank branches. Working Paper, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas.
18. Ray S.C. Resource-use efficiency in public schools: A study of connecticut data. Management Science. 37(12):1991;1620-1629.
19. Seiford L.M. Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978-1995). The Journal of Productivity Analysis. 7:1996;99-137.