Will publication of quality indicators in the health service improve treatment? International experience and Danish perspectives;Fører offentliggørelse af kvalitetsmålinger i sundhedsvæsenet til bedre kvalitet? Internationale erfaringer og Danske perspektiver

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 164, Issue 38, 2002, Pages 4380-4384

  Endahl, Lars A ^a   Utzon, Jan ^a  

^a Center for Evaluering   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; DENMARK; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL FINANCE; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; PATIENT SELECTION; PATIENT TRANSPORT; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BENCHMARKING; DENMARK; DISCLOSURE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; NEW YORK; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PATIENT SELECTION; PENNSYLVANIA; PUBLISHING; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; RISK MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037119708     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Sundhedspolitisk redegørelse 2000. København: Sundhedsministeriet, 2000.
2. Mainz J, Kjærgaard J, Knudsen JL. Over vågning af kvaliteten af sundhedsvæsenets ydelser ved hjælp af indikatorer. Ugeskr Læger 1999; 161: 5536-42.
3. Aftale om Amternes Økonomi for 2002. Aftaler om den Kommunale Økonomi for 2002. København: Finansministeriet, 2001.
4. Coles J. Public disclosure of health care performance reports: A response from the UK. Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11: 104-5.
5. Mebius C. Public disclosure of health care performance reports: Comments and reflections from Sweden. Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11: 102-3.
6. Nielsen PH. Kvalitetsmålinger skader patienterne. Sygeplejersken 2001; 101: 12-6.
7. Endahl LA, Utzon J. Ranglister over sygehuses kvalitet - er de vejledende eller vildledende? Ugeskr Læger 2002; 164: 4385-8.
8. Chassin MR, Hannan EL, DeBuono BA. Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 394-8.
9. Leatherman S, McCarthy D. Public disclosure of health care performance reports: Experience, evidence and issues for policy. Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11: 93-8.
10. Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH. The public release of performance data: What do we expect to gain? JAMA 2000; 283: 1866-74.
11. Hibbard JH. Use of outcome data by purchasers and consumers: New strategies and new dilemmas. Int J Qual Health Care 1998; 10: 503-8.
12. Schneider EC, Epstein AM. Use of public performance reports: A survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. JAMA 1998; 279: 1638-42.
13. Schneider EC, Epstein AM. Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 251-6.
14. Hannan EL, Stone CC, Biddle TL, DeBuono BA. Public release of cardiac surgery outcomes data in New York: What do New York state cardiologists think of it? Pan Am Heart J 1997; 134: 1120-8.
15. Offentliggärende av Vårdresultat: En Studie om vad Svensken Skulle Veta om Vårdens Kvalitet och Resultat. 417. SPRI Rapport. Stockholm: Hälsooch sjukvårdens utveklingsinstitut, 1996.
16. Udvalget for Kvalitetsmåling i Sygehusvæsenet. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 2000.
17. Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Jollis JG, Muhlbaier LH, Mark DB. The effects of New York's bypass surgery provider profiling on access to care and patient outcomes in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 993-9.
18. Green J, Wintfeld N. Report cards on cardiac surgeons. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1229-32.
19. Dziuban SW, McIlduff JB, Miller SJ, Dal Col RH. How a New York cardiac surgery program uses outcomes data. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58: 1871-6.
20. Hannan EL, Kumar D, Racz M, Siu AL, Chassin MR. New York State's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System: Four years later. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58: 1852-7.
21. Jencks SF. Clinical performance measurement - A hard sell. JAMA 2000; 283: 2015-6.
22. Bruster S, Jarman B, Bosanquet N, Weston D, Erens R, Delbanco TL. National survey of hospital patients. BMJ 1994; 309: 1542-6.
23. Ware JE. Effects of acquiescent response set on patient satisfaction ratings. Med Care 1978; 16: 327-36.
24. Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH. Public disclosure of performance data: Learning from the US experience. Qual Health Care 2000; 9: 53-7.
25. Collopy BT. Public disclosure of health care performance reports: What do we lose in giving information? Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11: 99-101.
26. Utzon J, Olsen PS, Bay-Nielsen M, Andersen KB, Christensen B, Endahl LA et al. Vurdering af kirurgiske ydelser i Danmark. Ugeskr Læger 2001; 163: 5662-4.
27. Specialeplanlægning og Lands- og Landsdelsfunktioner i Sygehusvæsenet. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 1996.
28. Holte K, Bay-Nielsen M, Utzon J, Stockel M, Funch-Jensen PM, Kehlet H. Operation for gastroesofageal reflux i Danmark 1997-1999. Ugeskr Læger 2001; 163: 5658-61.
29. Møller C, Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Utzon J, Ottesen BS. Hysterektomi i Danmark: En analyse af postoperativ hospitalisering, morbiditet og genindlæggelse. Ugeskr Læger 2002 (i trykken).
30. Grilli R, Freemantle N, Minozzi S, Domenighetti G, Finer D. Mass media interventions: Effects on health services utilisation (Cochrane Review). I: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001. Oxford: Update Software.
31. Hannan EL, Kilburn H, Racz M, Shields E, Chassin MR. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA 1994; 271: 761-6.
32. Spiegelhalter D. Surgical audit: Statistical lessons from Nightingale and Codman. J Royal Statis Soc A 1999; 162: 45-58.