Degeneracy inherent in the observational determination of the dark energy equation of state

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 66, Issue 12, 2002, Pages

  Wasserman, Ira ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COSMOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; COSMOS; DENSITY; ENERGY; MASS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MICROWAVE RADIATION; OBSERVATION; PHENOMENOLOGY;

EID: 0037116134     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.123511     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. P. de Bernardis, Nature (London) 404, 955 (2000).
2. A.E. Lange, Phys. Rev. D 63, 042001 (2001).
3. A.H. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3475 (2001).
4. C. Pryke, Astrophys. J. 568, 46 (2002).
5. R. Stompor, Astrophys. J. Lett. 561, L7 (2001).
6. P. de Bernardis, Astrophys. J. 564, 559 (2002).
7. M.S. Turner and M. White, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4439 (1997).
8. V. Silveira and I. Waga, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4625 (1997).
9. R.R. Caldwell, R. Dave, and P.J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1582 (1998).
10. P.M. Garnavich, Astrophys. J. 509, 74 (1998).
11. S. Podariu and B. Ratra, Astrophys. J. 532, 109 (2000).
12. T.D. Saini, S. Raychaudhury, V. Sahni, and A.A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1162 (2000).
13. D. Huterer and M.S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 60, 081301 (1999).
14. D. Huterer and M.S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 64, 123527 (2001).
15. T. Chiba and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 62, 121301(R) (2000).
16. T. Nakamura and T. Chiba, Astrophys. J. 550, 1 (2001).
17. S. Podariu and B. Ratra, Astrophys. J. 563, 28 (2001).
18. J.A. Newman and M. Davis, Astrophys. J. Lett. 534, L11 (2000).
19. J.A. Newman and M. Davis, Astrophys. J. 564, 567 (2002).
20. I. Maor, R. Brustein, and P.J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 6 (2001).
21. Y. Wang and P.M. Garnavich, Astrophys. J. 552, 445 (2001).
22. The need for precise independent knowledge of (Formula presented) for “reconstructing” the dark energy equation of state has also been stressed in 15 in the context of particular choices for comparison of quintessence models.
23. Quintessence models with double exponential potentials have been treated, e.g., by A.A. Sen and S. Sethi, Phys. Lett. B 532, 159 (2002), without stressing their relationship to the implicit degeneracy problem posed by incomplete knowledge of (Formula presented)
24. P.J.E. Peebles, The Large Scale Structure of the Universe (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1980), pp. 49–66.
25. P.G. Ferreira and M. Joyce, Phys. Rev. D 58, 023503 (1998).
26. L. Wang, R.R. Caldwell, J.P. Ostriker, and P.J. Steinhardt, Astrophys. J. 530, 17 (2000).
27. G. Efstathiou, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 310, 842 (1999).
28. S. Perlmutter, M.S. Turner, and M. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 670 (1999).
29. R. Bean and A. Melchiorri, Phys. Rev. D 65, 041302(R) (2002).
30. J. Kujat, A.M. Linn, R.J. Scherrer, and D.H. Weinberg, Astrophys. J. 572, 1 (2002).
31. A.G. Riess, Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998);
32. S. Perlmutter, Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999).