Physician's preferences and expectations in stroke rehabilitation - Results of a case-based questionnaire survey

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 24, Issue 18, 2002, Pages 954-960

  Hasenbein, U ^a   Kuss, O ^b   Baumer, M ^c   Schert, C ^c   Schneider, H ^d   Wallesch, C W ^a,c  

^a Inst of Neurol/Neurosurg Rehab   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^c OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d Medical Service   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PHYSICIAN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION CENTER; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SPEECH THERAPY; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICINE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; GERMANY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MEDICAL RECORDS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PROGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPECIALTIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 0037115505     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0963828021000007888     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Wade DT. Is stroke rehabilitation worthwhile? Current Opinion in Neurology and Neurosurgery 1993; 6: 78-82.
2. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2000; 2: CD000197.
3. Bäumer M, Schneider H, Frank B, Wallesch CW. Physicians' estimates of rehabilitation requirements after stroke and traumatic brain injury-a questionnaire survey in East Germany. Disability & Rehabilitation 2001; 23: 306-312.
4. Bürger W, Koch U. Indikation, Bedarf und Inanspruchnahmebereitschaft zur ambulanten/teilstationären Rehabilitation. UKE, Hamburg: Abt. Med. Psychol., 1996.
5. Lee AJ, Huber JH, Stason WB. Factors contributing to practice variation in post stroke rehabilitation. Health Services Research 1997; 32: 197-221.
6. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965; 14: 61-65.
7. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. Guide for the Use of the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation. Buffalo, NY: Medical Rehabilitation Project, 1986.
8. Nouri FM, Lincoln NB. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation 1987; 1: 301-305.
9. Brown H, Prescott R. Applied Mixed Models in Medicine. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
10. Herrmann M, Wallesch CW. Depressive changes in stroke patients. Disability & Rehabilitation 1993; 15: 55-66.
11. Wood R. The rehabilitation team. In: R. Greenwood, MP Barnes and TM McMillan (eds) Neurological Rehabilitation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1993; 41-54.
12. Gerdes N, Weidemann H, Jäckel WH. Die Protos-Studie. Ergebnisqualität stationärer Rehabilitation in 15 Kliniken der Wittgensteiner Kliniken Allianz. Darmstadt: Steinkopff, 2000.