Application of turbulence promoters in ceramic membrane bioreactor used for municipal wastewater reclamation

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 210, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 307-313

  Xu, Nong ^a   Xing, Weihong ^a   Xu, Nanping ^a   Shi, Jun ^a  

^a NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Ceramic membrane; Membrane bioreactor; Microfiltration; Turbulence promoters; Water treatment

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; TURBULENCE; WINDING;

EFFLUENT QUALITY;

WASTEWATER RECLAMATION;

BIOREACTOR; CERAMIC MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE; MICROFILTRATION; TURBULENCE; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOREACTOR; CERAMICS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DEVICE; EFFLUENT; ENVIRONMENTAL RECLAMATION; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUBE; TURBULENT FLOW; WASTE WATER; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0037114425     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00406-4     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anonymous, New development in membrane bioreactors: Increasing the capacity of existing biological treatment plants, Filtration Sep. 35 (1998) 792.
2. J. Manem, R. Sanderson, Membrane bioreactors, in: J. Mallevialle, P.E. Odendaal, M.R. Wiesner (Eds.), Water Treatment Membrane Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996.
3. Harris J.L., Dobos M. Enhanced ultrafiltration flux rates by enzymatic hydrolysis in protein recovery from wheat starch effluent. J. Membr. Sci. 41:1989;87-102.
4. Nystrom M., Jarvinen P. Modification of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes with UV irradiation and hydrophilicity increasing agents. J. Membr. Sci. 61:1991;275-296.
5. Matsumoto K., Katsutyama S., Ohya H. Cross-flow filtration of yeast by microporous ceramic membrane with backwashing. J. Ferment. Technol. 66:1988;199-205.
6. Rios G.M., Rakotoarisoa H., de la Fuente T. Basic transport mechanism of ultrafiltration in the presence of fluidized particles. J. Membr. Sci. 34:1987;331-343.
7. Winzeler H.B., Belfort G. Enhanced performance for pressure driven membrane process: the argument for fluid instabilities. J. Membr. Sci. 80:1993;35-47.
8. Tarleton E.S., Wakeman R.J. Microfiltration enhancement by electrical and ultrasonic force fields. Filtration Sep. 27:1990;192-194.
9. Gupta B.B., Howell J.A., Wu D., Field R.W. A helical baffle for cross-flow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 99:1995;31-42.
10. Jaffrin M.Y., Gupta B.B. Energy saving pulsatile mode cross-flow filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 86:1994;281-290.
11. Park J.Y., Choi C.K., Kim J.J. A study on dynamic separation of silica slurry using a rotating membrane filter. I. Experiments and filtrate flux. J. Membr. Sci. 97:1994;263-273.
12. Moulin P., Rouch J.C., Serra C., Clifton M.J., Aptel P. Mass transfer improvement by secondary flows: Dean vortices in coiled tubular membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 114:1996;235-244.
13. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
14. Mavrov V., Nikolov N.D., Islam M.A., Nikolova J.D. An investigation on the configuration of inserts in tubular ultrafiltration module to control concentration polarization. J. Membr. Sci. 75:1992;197-201.
15. Xing C.-H., Tardieu E., Qian Y., Wen X.-H. Ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor for urban wastewater reclamation. J. Membr. Sci. 177:2000;73-82.