Knowledge and interpretation in environmental conflict fish farming and eutrophication in the Archipelago Sea, SW Finland

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 61, Issue 2-4, 2002, Pages 157-168

  Peuhkuri, Timo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Environmental conflict; Fish farming; Knowledge; Spatial scales

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EUTROPHICATION; FARMS;

DISCURSIVE INTERPRETATION;

FISHERIES;

EUTROPHICATION; FISHING INDUSTRY; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE;

(SOUTHWEST); ARCHIPELAGO SEA; BALTIC SEA; FINLAND;

EID: 0037110855     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00110-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Berger, P., Luckmann, T., 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books, New York.
2. Berkes, F., 1995. Indigenous knowledge and resource management systems: a native Canadian case study from James Bay. In: Hanna, S., Munasinghe, M., (Eds.), Property rights in a social and ecological context. Case studies and design applications. The Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics/The World Bank, Washington, DC.
3. Best, J., 1987. Rhetoric in claims-making: constructing the missing children problem. Soc. Probl. 34 (2), 101-121.
4. Blowers, A., 1993. Environmental policy: the quest for sustainable development. Urban Stud. 30, 775-796.
5. Chambers, N.M., Ham, S.H., 1995. Strengthening regional planning through community education. In: Saunier, R.E., Meganck, R.A., (Eds.), Conservation of Biodiversity and the New Regional Planning. Organisation of American States/IUCN.
6. Couch, S.R., Kroll-Smith, S., 1997. Environmental movements and expert knowledge: evidence for a new populism. Int. J. Contemp. Sociol. 34, 185-210.
7. Dalby, S., Mackenzie, F., 1997. Reconceptualising local community: environment, identity and threat. Area 29, 99-108.
8. Davis, A., 1996. Social research and alternative approaches to fisheries management: an introductory comment. Soc. Nat. Resources 9, 233-235.
9. Eder, K., 1996. The institutionalisation of environmentalism: ecological discourse and the second transformation of the public sphere. In: Lash, S. Szerszynski, B., Wynne, B. (Eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology. Sage, London.
10. Eklund, E., 1996. Aquaculture in the Baltic Sea: regional development and environmental conflict. In: Bailey, C., Jentoft, S., Sinclair, P., (Eds.), Aquacultural Development. Social Dimensions of an Emerging Industry. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 59-67.
11. Entman, R., 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J. Commun. 43, 4.
12. Feldman, M.S., March, J.G., 1981. Information in organisations as signal and symbol. Administrative Sci. Quat. 26, 171-186.
13. Folke, C., Berkes, F., 1995. Mechanisms that link property rights to ecological systems. In: Hanna, S., Munasinghe, M. (Eds.), Property Rights and the Environment. Social and Ecological Issues. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 121-137.
14. Gamson, W., Modigliani, A. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am. J. Sociol. 95, 1-37.
15. Goffman, E., 1974. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organisation of Experience. Northeastern University Press, Boston.
16. Grinyer, A., 1995. Risk, the real world and naive sociology: perceptions of risk from occupational injury in the health service. In: Gabe, J. (Ed.), Medicine, Health and Risk. Sociological Approaches. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford, pp. 31-51.
17. Hajer, M.A., 1995. The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological modernization and the policy process. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
18. Hannigan, J.A., 1995. Environmental sociology. A social constructionist perspective. Routledge, London.
19. Helminen, H., Juntura, E., Koponen, J., Laihonen, P., Ylinen, H., 1998. Itämereltä Saaristomereen tulevan fosfori-ja typpikuormituksen arviointi kolmiulotteisen virtausmallin avulla. Vesitalous 2, 27-30.
20. Hildèn, M., 1997. Risk, Uncertainty and Ignorance in Fisheries Management - an Analysis of Management Advice. Monographs of the Boreal Environment Research No. 5. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki.
21. Hobbs, R.J., Saunders, D.A., 1995. Conversing with aliens: do scientists communicate with each other well enough to solve complex environmental problems. In: Saunders, D.A., Craig J.L., Mattiske, E.M. (Eds.), Nature Conservation. 4. The Role of Networks. Surrey Beatty & Sons, pp. 195-198.
22. Kałtankasvatuksen ympäristönsuojełuohjelma, 1996-2005, 1996. Suomen ympäristökeskuksen moniste 14, Helsinki
23. Kirkkala, T., 1998. Miten voit Saaristomeri. Ympäristön tila Lounais-Suomessa I. Lounais-Suomen ympäristökeskus, Turku.
24. Leppäkoski, E., Helminen, H., Hänninen, J., Tallqvist, M., 1999. Aquatic biodiversity under antrophogenic stress: an insight from the Archipelago Sea (SW Finland). Biodiversity Conservation 8 (1), 55-70.
25. Lidskog, R., 1994. Radioactive and hazardous waste management in Sweden. movements, politics and science. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Sociologica Upsaliensia 38, Uppsala.
26. Mäkinen, T., 1994. Kalanviljely luonnonvarojen hyödyntäjänäelinkeinon ympäristövaikutukset. Suomen Kalankasvattaja 1 (s), 30-32.
27. Myerson, G., Rydin, Y., 1996. The language of environment. A new rhetoric. UCL Press, London.
28. Pellizzoni, L., 1999. Reflexive Modernisation. Theor. Culture Soc. 16 (4), 99-125.
29. Peuhkuri, T., Jokinen, P., 1999. The role of knowledge and spatial contexts in biodiversity policies. A sociological perspective. Biodiversity Conservation 8, 133-147.
30. Possiel, W., Saunier, R.E., Meganck, R., 1995. In situ conservation of biodiversity. In: Saunier, R.E., Meganck, R. (Eds.), Conservation of Biodiversity and the New Regional Planning. Department of Regional Development and Environment Executive Secretariat for Economic and Social Affairs General Secretariat, Organisation of American States, pp. 7-20.
31. Pratt, A.C., 1991. Discourses of locality. Environ. Plann. 23, 257-266.
32. Rannikko, P., 1996. Local environmental conflicts and the change in environmental consciousness. Acta Sociol. 39, 57-72.
33. Rydin, Y., 1999. Can we talk ourselves into sustainability? The role of discourse in the environmental policy process. Environ. Values 8, 467-484.
34. Salo, H., Sundell, P., 1996. Kalanviljelyn vesistövaikutukset ja niiden vähentäminen. Kirjallisuusselvitys. Suomen Kalankasvattajaliitto r.y., Keuruuprint, Keuruu.
35. Salter, L., 1988. Mandated Science. Science and Scientists in the Making of Standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortrecht.
36. Stipa, T., 1998. Vastine artikkeliin Itämereltä saaristomereen tulevan fosfori-ja typpikuormituksen arviointi kolmiulotteisen virtausmallin avulla. Vesitalous 6, 37-38.
37. Varjopuro, R., 1997. Ei anneta kalastaa silloin kun on kalastuksen aika. Lohen ammattikalastajien näkemyksiä kalastuksen säätelystä ja sen vaikutuksesta kalastusammattiin. Riista-ja kalatalouden tutkimuslaitos, Kala-ja riistaraportteja nro 97, Pori.
38. Varjopuro, R., Furman, E., 2000. Kalankasvatuksen lupajärjestelmä - ympäristöpollittiset ohjauskeinot yrittäjän näkökulmasta. Suomen ympäristö 380. Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki.
39. Vuorinen, I., 1999. Den havsekologiska forskningen och trovärdigheten. En kritisk granskning av några allmänt förekommande slutsatser. Skärgård 1, 19-20.
40. Wynne, B., 1996. May the sheep safely graze?. A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., Wynne, B. (Eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology. Sage, London.
41. Yearley, S., 1991. The Green Case. A Sociology of Environmental Issues, Arguments and Politics. Harper Collins Academic, London.