Rigor of peer review and the standing of a journal

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 166, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 1013-1014

  Tobin, Martin J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CRITICAL ILLNESS; EDITORIAL; INTENSIVE CARE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; NOTE; STANDARD;

PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS;

EID: 0037108535     PISSN: 1073449X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.2208007     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Zuckerman H, Merton RK. Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva 1971;9:66-100.
2. Ziman JM. Public knowledge: an essay concerning the social dimension of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1968. p. 111.
3. Hoppin FG. How I review an original scientific article. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1019-1023.
4. Siegelman SS. The genesis of modern science: contribution of scientific societies and scientific journals. Radiology 1998;208:9-16.
5. Lock S. A difficult balance: editorial peer review in medicine. London: British Medical Journal; 1991.
6. Goodman SN, Berlin J, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:11-21.
7. Pierie JP, Walvoort HC, Overbeke AJ. Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. Lancet 1996;348:1480-1483.
8. Smith R. The future of peer review. In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, editors. Peer review in health sciences. London: BMJ Books; 1999. p. 244-253.
9. Magee B. The story of philosophy. London: Dorling Kindersley; 1998. p. 8.
10. Polanyi M. Science, faith and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1946.
11. Polanyi M. Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan; 1958. p. 225-257.
12. Gross AG. The rhetoric of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996. p. 129-143.
13. Ziman J. An introduction to science studies: the philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984. p. 34-57.
14. Relman A. Journals. In: Warren KS, editor. Coping with the medical literature: a primer for the scientist and the clinician. New York: Praeger Publishers. 1981. p. 67-78.
15. Ingelfinger F. Peer review in biomedical publication. Am J Med 1974;56:686-692.