Trial wave functions with long-range Coulomb correlations for two-dimensional N-electron systems in high magnetic fields

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1153151-1153155

  Yannouleas, Constantine ^a   Landman, Uzi ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ELECTRON; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; WAVEFORM;

EID: 0037105065     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. B 27; 3383 (1983).
2. R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395 (1983).
3. J.K. Jain, Phys. Rev. B 41, 7653 (1990).
4. J.K. Jain and T. Kawamura, Europhys. Lett. 29, 321 (1995).
5. S.M. Girvin and T. Jach, Phys. Rev. B 28, 4506 (1983).
6. L. Jacak, P. Hawrylak, and A. Wojs, Quantum Dots (Springer, Berlin, 1998), and references therein.
7. A. Wojs and P. Hawrylak, Phys. Rev. B 56, 13227 (1997).
8. S.-R. Eric Yang, A.H. MacDonald, and M.D. Johnson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3194 (1993).
9. W.Y. Ruan, Y.Y. Liu, C.G. Bao, and Z.Q. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 51, 7942 (1995).
10. T. Seki, Y. Kuramoto, and T. Nishino, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 3945 (1996).
11. P.A. Maksym, H. Imamura, G.P. Mallon, and H. Aoki, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12, R299 (2000), and references therein.
12. H.-M. Müller and S.E. Koonin, Phys. Rev. B 54, 14532 (1996).
13. C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15895 (2000).
14. C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 90, 699 (2002).
15. F.D.M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 605 (1983); S.A. Trugman and S. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B 31, 5280 (1985).
16. F.D.M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 605 (1983); S.A. Trugman and S. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B 31, 5280 (1985).
17. A.M. Chang, M.K. Wu, C.C. Chi, L.N. Pfeiffer, and K.W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 143 (2001), and references therein.
18. V.J. Goldman and E.V. Tsiper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5841 (2001).
19. E.V. Tsiper and V.J. Goldman, Phys. Rev. B 64, 165311 (2001).
20. P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-body Problem (Springer, New York, 1980), Chap. 11, and references therein.
21. C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5325 (1999); 85, 2220(E) (2000).
22. C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5325 (1999); 85, 2220(E) (2000).
23. C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, L591 (2002).
24. K. Maki and X. Zotos, Phys. Rev. B 28, 4349 (1983).
25. Depending an the strength of the interelectron repulsion, WM's can also form at zero magnetic field; see Refs. 13, 20, and 21. For a CPD/exact-solution study of such WM's at B = 0, see Ref. 24.
26. C. Yannouleas and U. Landman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1726 (2000).
27. V.M. Bedanov and F.M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 49, 2667 (1994).
28. A certain degree of Wigner crystallization has also been found in another geometry, i.e., in an infinite Hall bar at an integral filling factor v = 2; see J.P. Rodriguez, M.J. Franco, and L. Brey, Phys. Rev. B 61, 16787 (2000).
29. S.A. Mikhailov, Physica B 299, 6 (2001).
30. In our earlier publications (Refs. 13, 14, 20, and 21), we have used the term spin-and-space (sS)-UHF to emphasize the breaking of both the spin and space symmetries. In this paper, only the breaking of the space symmetry is involved.
31. L operator used for restoring the circular symmetry in the simplest (0,N) and (1,N-1) ring arrangements (Ref. 21), or for objects without a ring structure (Ref. 19).
32. The algebraic manipulations reported here were performed using MATHEMATICA; see S. Wolfram, Mathematica: A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1991).
33. The magic angular momenta for N≤7 have been also discussed in the context of the geometric configuration (Refs. 9 and 10) and the Eckart frame (Ref. 11) models. However, unlike our approach, these models do not afford derivation of analytical forms for the REM wave functions.
34. The REM functions also have close-to-unity overlaps with the exact wave functions. For an example, see Table II in ArXiv: cond-mat/0202062 (unpublished).
35. 3=7.
36. See Fig. 3(f) in X. Wan, K. Yang, and E.H. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 056802 (2002).